Assessing Urban Flood Risk with Lidar-Derived DEMs: Lagos Metropolis Case Study
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Urban Flood Risk and Lidar-Derived DEMs
- 2.2Conceptualization of Urban Hydrology in Lagos Metropolis
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Resilience Theory and Spatial Vulnerability Theory
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Risk Perception and Adaptation Pathways
- 2.5Empirical Review: Global Applications of Lidar DEMs in Flood Modelling
- 2.6Empirical Review: Lagos State Flood Risk Assessments and Data Gaps
- 2.7Data Acquisition and Processing Techniques for Lidar DEMs
- 2.8Hydrological Modelling Approaches for Urban Floods
- 2.9Urban Drainage Infrastructure and Flood Exposure in Lagos
- 2.10Remote Sensing for Floodplain Delineation
- 2.11Socio-Economic Impacts of Urban Flooding in Nigerian Cities
- 2.12Identified Gaps in the Literature
- 2.13Conceptual Model or Synthesis of Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Case Study of Lagos Metropolis
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism and Mixed Methods Rationale
- 3.3Population of the Study: Lagos Metropolis Administrative Zones
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stakeholder and Spatial Sample Selection
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Lidar DEMs, Satellite Imagery, Bathymetry, Rainfall Gauges, Household Surveys
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments
- 3.7Data Processing and Pre-Processing Procedures for Lidar DEMs
- 3.8Data Analysis Methods: Flood Hazard Modelling, Spatial Overlay, and Statistical Testing
- 3.9Model Specification: Hydrological Risk Index and Urban Flood Vulnerability Model
- 3.10Ethical Considerations
- 3.11Data Management and Reproducibility
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation Framework and Dataset Description
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of Lagos Flood Exposure Indicators
- 4.3Spatial Visualization of Flood Hazard Zones Using Lidar-Derived DEMs
- 4.4Flood Hazard Modelling Results and Validation
- 4.5Hypotheses Testing: Relationship Between Elevation, Drainage Capacity, and Flood Occurrence
- 4.6Interpretation of Results in the Lagos Context
- 4.7Discussion of Findings Relative to Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks
- 4.8Comparison with Prior Studies and Policy Implications
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge
- 5.4Policy and Planning Recommendations for Lagos Metropolis
- 5.5Implications for Urban Flood Management and Resilience
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Research
- 5.7Limitations of the Study and Future Improvements
Thesis Abstract
Urban flooding poses increasing threats to Lagos Metropolis, driven by rapid urbanisation, expanding impervious surfaces, and climate-induced rainfall intensification, which overwhelm drainage infrastructure and degrade socio-economic resilience. This study addresses the gap in high-resolution, evidence-based flood risk assessment by integrating LiDAR-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) with socio-spatial indicators to delineate hazard, exposure, and vulnerability components for Lagos. The aim is to produce a spatially explicit flood risk map and inform adaptive urban planning strategies. Specific objectives are (i) to generate a high-resolution LiDAR-derived DEM for central Lagos and validate it against ground truth elevations; (ii) to model surface runoff and floodplain delineation under representative meteorological scenarios using hydrological and hydraulic analyses; (iii) to quantify exposure by mapping population, critical infrastructure, and land-use types within delineated flood-prone zones; (iv) to assess vulnerability through a composite index incorporating housing quality, income, and access to services; (v) to examine the relative importance of physical versus socio-economic factors on flood risk using multivariate regression and spatial autocorrelation analyses; and (vi) to develop a decision-support framework for municipal authorities that integrates risk maps with policy-oriented recommendations. The study adopts a mixed-methods approach under a positivist paradigm, combining quantitative GIS-Hydrology analytics with qualitative stakeholder validation to ensure practical relevance. The population comprises wards within Lagos Metropolis, with a stratified sample of 40 representative neighborhoods selected to capture diverse urban morphologies and exposure profiles. Data collection employs (a) airborne LiDAR data at 0.5–1.0 m point density, validated by a 30-site ground control network; (b) historic rainfall series and scenario rainfall intensities (10-, 25-, and 100-year events) from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency; (c) census-derived population counts, housing quality indicators, and asset inventories; (d) infrastructure datasets (electricity, healthcare, education, and drainage networks) from Lagos State GIS archives; and (e) semi-structured interviews with urban planners and community leaders (n ? 25) to interpret exposure and vulnerability dimensions. Analytical techniques include LiDAR-based DEM generation and hydrological modelling (Hydroflows/HEC-HMS) to simulate surface runoff, integrated with 2D hydraulic modelling (HEC-RAS) to identify flood extents and depths. Exposure is quantified via overlay analyses of population and critical infrastructure within flood polygons, while vulnerability is synthesized through principal component analysis (PCA) and a weighted multi-criteria index. Spatial autocorrelation is tested with Moran’s I, and regression models (ordinary least squares and geographically weighted regression) assess relationships between risk components and urban form metrics. Ethical considerations address data privacy and stakeholder engagement protocols. Expected findings indicate that the LiDAR-derived DEM significantly improves flood delineation accuracy (root mean square error < 0.25 m against ground truth), and that flood risk in Lagos is disproportionately concentrated along dense informal settlements and near drainage bottlenecks, with socio-economic vulnerability amplifying hazard impacts. The study anticipates that green-blue infrastructure indicators and targeted drainage upgrades will materially reduce estimated annual damages by 12–25% under moderate scenarios, contingent on implementation. Contribution to knowledge includes methodological advancement in integrating high-resolution LiDAR topography with socio-spatial vulnerability frameworks for megacity flood risk assessment in a tropical coastal context, and empirical evidence to refine Lagos’s flood management policy. The main conclusion is that comprehensive flood risk governance requires synchronized physical and social dimensions, supported by high-resolution topographic data and participatory planning. Recommendations emphasize prioritising street-scale drainage improvement, land-use zoning that limits development in high-risk zones, community-based early warning and evacuation planning, and investment in nature-based solutions to enhance urban resilience. The research also offers a scalable framework applicable to similar tropical African urban contexts facing flood hazards.
Thesis Overview
This research examines how urban flood risk in Lagos can be assessed using high-resolution elevation data derived from Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) to create accurate digital elevation models (DEMs) and flood inundation scenarios. It matters because Lagos experiences frequent flooding during the rainy season, causing housing damage, transport disruption, and health risks, and current flood maps may be outdated or insufficient for urban planning. The study aims to produce a robust, city-scale assessment that supports risk-informed decision-making for infrastructure, land use planning, and emergency response.
What problem or gap it addresses:
- Limited use of lidar-derived DEMs for fine-grained flood risk assessments in Lagos.
- Inadequate integration of topography, land cover, drainage networks, and social vulnerability into flood models.
- A need for spatially explicit, scenario-based flood maps to guide adaptation strategies.
What the researcher will do step by step:
1. Define study extent within Lagos Metropolis and identify target neighborhoods for validation.
2. Collect data: acquire lidar point cloud data to generate high-resolution DEMs; obtain recent land cover maps, drainage infrastructure data, historical rainfall and flood records, and census-based vulnerability indicators.
3. Process data: create lidar-derived DEMs with sub-meter vertical accuracy, perform hydrological conditioning, and derive flood-inundation scenarios under various rainfall events.
4. Develop analytical framework: combine physical hydrodynamic reasoning with statistical risk indicators to produce flood risk maps that integrate exposure, vulnerability, and hazard layers.
5. Validate models: compare predicted inundation extents with observed flood records and remote-sensed flood footprints from recent events.
6. Analyze results: identify high-risk zones, quantify potential damages, and test sensitivity to key parameters.
7. Interpret findings in light of urban planning and policy, and translate results into actionable maps and guidelines.
What contribution the study will make:
- A reproducible approach for using lidar-derived DEMs to assess urban flood risk in a dense tropical city.
- An integrated flood risk model that combines topography, land use, drainage, and social vulnerability for Lagos.
- Practical outputs (risk maps, scenario analyses) to inform adaptation planning and emergency preparedness.
Expected outcome:
- Detailed, high-resolution flood risk maps for Lagos Metropolis under multiple rainfall scenarios, with identified priority areas for mitigation and resilience investments.