A unified Framework for Multiscale Pore-Scale-to-Field Reservoir Forecasting
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction to Multiscale Pore-Scale-to-Field Forecasting
- 1.2Background of Multiscale Reservoir Forecasting Challenges
- 1.3Statement of the Problem in Multiscale Upscaling
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions Specific to Multiscale Forecasting
- 1.6Research Hypotheses on Model Consistency Across Scales
- 1.7Significance of a Unified Multiscale Framework for Industry Practice
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation Across Pore, Core, and Field Scales
- 1.9Limitations of the Study in Data and Scale Transitions
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms in Multiscale Reservoir Forecasting
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Fundamentals of Pore-to-Field Upscaling
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Multiphase Flow in Heterogeneous Media
- 2.3Conceptual Review: Uncertainty in Scale Transition
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Homogenization Theory and Its Applications
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: Bayesian Updating for Multiscale Forecasts
- 2.6Theoretical Framework: Information-Theoretic Approaches to Model Integration
- 2.7Empirical Review: Pore-Scale Imaging and Digital Rock Physics Studies
- 2.8Empirical Review: Core-Scale to Sandstone Reservoir Forecasting Case Studies
- 2.9Empirical Review: Field-Scale Forecasting with Upscaled Models
- 2.10Identified Gaps in Multiscale Forecasting Literature
- 2.11Conceptual Model: Synthesis Diagram of Multiscale Framework
- 2.12Summary of Review and Rationale for the Proposed Framework
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design: Integrated Multiscale Modeling Framework Development
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Postpositivist/Pragmatic Stance for Model Validation
- 3.3Population of the Study: Reservoir Configurations Across Basins
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified Selection of Rock Types and Field Analogues
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Imaging, Core Measurements, and Field Data
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Calibration and Cross-Validation Protocols
- 3.7Data Processing Pipeline: From Pore-Scale Images to Field-Scale Forecasts
- 3.8Model Specification: Mathematical Formulation of Multiscale Coupling
- 3.9Analytical Framework: Upscaling Operators and Coupled Governing Equations
- 3.10Model Calibration and Validation Strategy: History Matching and Uncertainty Quantification
- 3.11Ethical Considerations in Data Use and Collaboration
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation Overview: Source and Structure of Multiscale Datasets
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of Pore-Scale Features and Field History
- 4.3Descriptive Analysis of Core-Scale Properties and Upscaled Parameters
- 4.4Descriptive Analysis of Field-Scale Forecast Outputs
- 4.5Hypotheses Testing: Multiscale Consistency of Forecasts
- 4.6Hypotheses Testing: Sensitivity to Upscaling Operators
- 4.7Interpretation of Results: How Multiscale Coupling Improves Forecast Accuracy
- 4.8Discussion of Findings Relative to Conceptual Framework and Literature
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Key Findings Across Scales
- 5.2Conclusions on the Efficacy of a Unified Multiscale Framework
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge and Methodological Advances
- 5.4Practical Implications for Reservoir Forecasting Practice
- 5.5Recommendations for Implementation and Industry Adoption
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies and Framework Enhancements
Thesis Abstract
This study addresses the fragmented understanding of fluid flow across scales in hydrocarbon reservoirs by proposing a unified framework that integrates pore-scale physics with field-scale forecasting to reduce uncertainty in production planning and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) design. The aim is to develop a multiscale reservoir forecasting framework that coherently links pore-scale transport phenomena, meso-scale heterogeneity, and macro-scale reservoir performance through a theory-driven, data-informed model. Specific objectives are (i) to quantify pore-scale flow mechanisms, including capillary pressure-saturation relationships, wettability effects, and pore-network connectivity, (ii) to upscale these mechanisms through a multiscale upscaling scheme that preserves essential nonlinearities and hysteresis, (iii) to integrate upscaled properties with a dynamic reservoir simulator to generate predictive field-scale forecasts under varying operating conditions, (iv) to validate the framework against rigorous field data from three representative reservoirs and perform sensitivity analyses to identify dominant drivers of forecast uncertainty, and (v) to formulate decision-support guidelines for reservoir management and EOR planning. The methodology adopts a mixed-methods, theory-driven research design anchored in percolation theory, homogenization theory, and stochastic upscaling. The population comprises carbonate and sandstone reservoirs with diverse pore structures. A sample of 12 representative core plugs per rock type is selected for detailed pore-scale imaging and core-flood experiments, totaling 24 cores, complemented by digital rock physics simulations. Data collection instruments include micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) for pore-network characterization, enhanced oil recovery laboratory experiments (waterflood and gas-CO2 schemes), capillary pressure-saturation curves, contact angle measurements for wettability, and time-lapse seismic-aligned dynamic data from field operators. Additional field data from three mature reservoirs provide production histories, pressure, and saturation data sets, totaling 10,000+ data points. Analytical techniques include Bayesian hierarchical modeling to fuse pore-scale parameters with upscaled properties, regression analysis to quantify correlations between pore metrics and macroscopic permeability, and multiscale finite element/finite volume upscaling with homogenization to derive field-scale parameters. Reservoir simulation employs a dual-physics upscaling approach embedding pore-scale derived relationships within a standard black-oil or compositional model, calibrated via history matching using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Validation comprises cross-pailure testing and out-of-sample forecasts over a 20-year planning horizon, with performance metrics including root-mean-square error (RMSE) and Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE). Theoretical grounding integrates percolation theory for connectivity thresholds, Ho-Lee-like capillary dynamics, and pore-network modeling to interpret multiscale flow paths. Conceptual integration is formalized in a multiscale forecasting algorithm that propagates uncertainty from microscopic parameters to field-scale forecasts. Expected findings indicate that a small set of pore-scale descriptors—pore-throat size distribution, fractal dimension of pore networks, and wettability state—explain a substantial portion of field-scale heterogeneity and forecast uncertainty when upscaled with a retention-aware homogenization technique. The framework is anticipated to reduce forecast error by 15–25% relative to conventional upscaling approaches across tested reservoirs, and to identify critical thresholds in connectivity and wettability that trigger non-linear recovery responses under varied injection strategies. The study contributes new knowledge by operationalizing a repeatable, theory-consistent multiscale forecasting workflow that preserves nonlinear capillary and hysteretic effects, integrates uncertainty propagation, and provides a transparent bridge from micro- to macro-scale reservoir behavior. Practical implications include improved well-placement optimization, more robust EOR design, and enhanced risk assessment for production forecasting. Conclusions will emphasize the value of linking pore-scale physics with field-scale forecasting through a unified, probabilistic upscaling framework, demonstrating improved predictive capability and decision-support utility. Recommendations will address extending the framework to include chemical EOR effects, incorporating real-time downhole sensing data for continuous model updating, and developing standardized datasets for cross-site validation to generalize the framework across diverse reservoir types.
Thesis Overview
This research develops a unified framework that links pore-scale processes to field-scale reservoir performance, enabling more accurate forecasts of oil and gas recovery across multiple spatial scales. It addresses the gap between detailed microstructural understanding of rocks and large-scale reservoir models, where decisions often rely on simplified representations that can misjudge connectivity, flow pathways, and influential heterogeneities.
Why it matters: Accurate multiscale forecasting reduces uncertainty in production planning, enhances recovery strategies, and lowers development risk. By integrating pore-scale physics with field-scale simulations, operators can better predict breakthrough times, optimize water or gas injection, and design more effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) campaigns.
What problem or knowledge gap it addresses: Current approaches typically optimize either pore-scale descriptions (e.g., random pore-network models) or continuum-scale reservoir models, with limited or ad hoc coupling between scales. This leads to inconsistent parameterization, biased predictions, and insufficient representation of buoyancy-driven flow, capillary effects, and pore-scale tortuosity at field scales.
Research approach in steps:
1. Literature synthesis to identify key multiscale coupling mechanisms, including capillary pressure-saturation relationships, relative permeability hysteresis, and pore-network connectivity impacts on upscaling.
2. Develop a theoretical framework that defines consistent scale-bridging operators (from pore-scale descriptors to upscaled parameters) and prescribes information flow between scales.
3. Build a hybrid modeling platform combining: (a) high-fidelity pore-scale simulations (pore-network models or lattice Boltzmann) for representative lithologies, and (b) a calibrated continuum reservoir model that accepts multiscale inputs.
4. Data collection and calibration: gather core micromodels, digital rock images, and field production data from a carbonate and a sandstone reservoir, with sample sizes of 50–100 core plugs per lithology and corresponding core-flow experiments.
5. Parameter estimation and validation: use regression analysis and Bayesian calibration to link pore-scale outputs (capillary pressure curves, relative permeability) to upscaled properties, followed by history matching against production data.
6. Performance assessment: quantify forecasting accuracy using RMSE and probability of exceedance metrics; conduct sensitivity analyses to identify influential scale-bridging parameters.
7. Scenario analysis: test different injection strategies and EOR methods under the unified framework to demonstrate decision-support capabilities.
Expected contribution: a coherent, validated method for translating pore-scale phenomena into reliable field-scale forecasts, reducing uncertainty in production planning and enabling more effective reservoir management.
Anticipated outcomes: improved prediction of breakthrough timing, better upscaling of capillary and relative permeability data, and a decision-support toolkit for integrated reservoir optimization.