A Model for Enhancing Critical Thinking in Science Education Through Inquiry-Based Learning
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review of Critical Thinking in Science Education
- 2.2Conceptual Review of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) Principles
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Bloom’s Taxonomy and Piaget’s Constructivism
- 2.4Empirical Review of Critical Thinking Development via Inquiry in Science
- 2.5Empirical Review of Inquiry-Based Learning Implementation in Science Classrooms
- 2.6Gaps in Existing Literature on Critical Thinking and IBL in Science Education
- 2.7Challenges and Barriers to Implementing IBL for Critical Thinking Enhancement
- 2.8Benefits and Outcomes of Inquiry Approaches in Science Learning
- 2.9Conceptual Model of Critical Thinking Development through Inquiry-Based Learning
- 2.10Summary of Literature and Synthesis
- 2.11Summary Diagram of Existing and Proposed Models
- 2.12Future Directions in Research on Critical Thinking and IBL
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Model Development and Validation Study
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism Approach
- 3.3Population of the Study: Science Teachers and Students in Secondary Schools
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified Random Sampling
- 3.5Data Sources and Collection Instruments: Questionnaires, Observation Checklists, Interviews
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments
- 3.7Data Collection Procedures
- 3.8Data Analysis Methods: Descriptive and Inferential Statistics, Model Testing
- 3.9Model Specification and Analytical Framework: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
- 3.10Ethical Considerations in Data Collection and Analysis
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Participant Demographics
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of Instruments and Responses
- 4.3Testing of Research Hypotheses: Quantitative Results
- 4.4Model Validation and Fit Indices
- 4.5Interpretation of Key Findings in Relation to the Proposed Model
- 4.6Discussion of Results in the Context of Literature Review
- 4.7Implications of Findings for Science Education Practice
- 4.8Limitations of Findings and Considerations for Generalization
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Key Findings
- 5.2Conclusions on the Effectiveness of the Proposed Model
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge and Theoretical Advancement
- 5.4Practical Recommendations for Science Educators and Policy Makers
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Research Based on Study Gaps
- 5.6Final Reflection and Study Limitations
Thesis Abstract
In recent years, the imperative to foster critical thinking skills within science education has become increasingly evident, as these skills are essential for scientific literacy, problem-solving, and innovation in a knowledge-driven society. Despite the integration of inquiry-based learning (IBL) into science curricula worldwide, there remains a significant gap in understanding how to systematically develop and implement effective models that enhance critical thinking specifically through IBL strategies. This study aims to develop, validate, and evaluate a contextualized model for enhancing critical thinking in science education via inquiry-based learning approaches, with the ultimate goal of informing pedagogical practices and curriculum design. The specific objectives include identifying key elements that influence critical thinking in science learning environments, designing a theoretical model that integrates inquiry-based learning principles with critical thinking development, and empirically validating this model among secondary school science students. Employing a mixed-methods research design, this study combines quantitative and qualitative approaches to ensure comprehensive understanding and validation of the proposed model. The quantitative component involves a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group, involving a sample of 240 secondary school science students selected through stratified random sampling from eight schools. The intervention groups will receive instruction based on the developed inquiry-based learning model, while control groups will follow conventional science teaching methods. Data collection instruments include a validated Critical Thinking in Science Education Scale (CTS-ES), observation checklists, and interview protocols for teachers and students. The qualitative component involves thematic analysis of interview transcripts and classroom observation notes to explore contextual factors affecting critical thinking development and model implementation fidelity. Data analysis will utilize multiple regression analysis to assess the impact of the inquiry-based learning model on students’ critical thinking skills, alongside Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to control for pre-intervention variables. The thematic analysis will be guided by Braun and Clarke’s framework to identify recurring themes related to pedagogical practices and student engagement. The study also applies Bloom’s Taxonomy and Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory to underpin the theoretical model, emphasizing the importance of social interaction and scaffolded inquiry in fostering higher-order thinking. Key anticipated findings include significant improvements in critical thinking scores among students exposed to the inquiry-based learning model, compared to those in the control group. The qualitative analysis is expected to reveal enhanced student engagement, deeper conceptual understanding, and increased autonomy in scientific inquiry. The combined findings aim to substantiate the model’s effectiveness and provide insights into the critical components necessary for successful implementation. Furthermore, the study conjectures that teacher training, resource availability, and student motivation are contextual factors that influence the efficacy of inquiry-based interventions. This research contributes to knowledge by offering a validated, pragmatic model tailored to science education settings that systematically integrates inquiry-based learning with the development of critical thinking skills. It expands theoretical understanding by empirically testing the relationships outlined in the model, grounded in established learning theories such as Bloom’s Taxonomy and Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. It also provides practical implications for curriculum developers, policymakers, and educators seeking to enhance cognitive and metacognitive skills in science classrooms. In conclusion, the study recommends the widespread adoption of the validated inquiry-based learning model, coupled with targeted teacher professional development and resource allocation, to foster a culture of critical thinking in science education. Future research should explore longitudinal effects, scalability across diverse educational contexts, and the integration of technology-enhanced inquiry strategies to further refine and expand the model’s applicability and impact.
Thesis Overview
This research focuses on developing a practical model to improve critical thinking skills in science students by using inquiry-based learning (IBL). Critical thinking is essential for students to analyze, evaluate, and create scientific knowledge, but many science education programs struggle to effectively develop these skills. The study aims to address this gap by designing, testing, and validating a model that teachers can apply to foster critical thinking through inquiry-based activities, where students learn by asking questions, investigating problems, and constructing their own understanding.
The researcher will start by reviewing existing literature on critical thinking, inquiry-based learning, and their relationship in science education. This helps identify what has already been tried and where gaps remain. Next, the researcher will develop a theoretical framework combining relevant theories such as Bloom's taxonomy and constructivist learning theory. Using this framework, they will design an intervention—specific classroom activities and teaching strategies aligned with inquiry-based principles.
To test the model, the researcher will select a sample of science teachers and their students from several secondary schools, aiming for around 200 students and 20 teachers. Data will be collected through pre- and post-intervention assessments of students’ critical thinking skills using validated tests, classroom observations, and teacher interviews. Quantitative data from tests will be analysed using statistical techniques such as ANOVA to measure changes in students’ critical thinking levels, while qualitative data from observations and interviews will be analysed thematically.
The study expects to find that the introduced model significantly improves students’ critical thinking skills. The main contribution is providing a validated, easy-to-apply framework for teachers to enhance critical thinking in science classes through inquiry-based methods. The researcher anticipates that the findings could influence science teaching practices and guide curriculum development to better prepare students for complex scientific problems.