Comparison of Image Quality between Traditional Film Radiography and Digital Radiography in a Clinical Setting

Thesis Abstract

**Abstract
** This thesis investigates the comparison of image quality between traditional film radiography and digital radiography in a clinical setting. The study aims to address the ongoing debate in the radiography field regarding the effectiveness and efficiency of these two imaging techniques. The research methodology involved a comprehensive literature review, data collection from clinical settings, and analysis of image quality parameters. The findings provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of traditional film radiography and digital radiography, contributing to the enhancement of diagnostic imaging practices. The results indicate that digital radiography offers superior image quality, faster processing times, and reduced exposure to radiation compared to traditional film radiography. However, challenges such as initial setup costs and the need for continuous training and maintenance are associated with digital radiography. The study concludes by emphasizing the significance of adopting digital radiography in clinical settings to improve patient care and diagnostic accuracy. Further research is recommended to explore advancements in digital radiography technology and address the remaining limitations to fully optimize its potential in healthcare settings.