Evaluating AI-Powered Building Cost Estimation Accuracy in Quantity Surveying
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction to AI-Driven Building Cost Estimation in Quantity Surveying
- 1.2Background of AI Applications in Construction Cost Management
- 1.3Statement of the Challenges in Traditional Cost Estimation Processes
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of Evaluating AI-Powered Estimation Accuracy
- 1.5Research Questions Regarding AI Effectiveness in Cost Predictions
- 1.6Hypotheses on the Reliability and Precision of AI Models
- 1.7Significance of Assessing AI Estimation for Industry Stakeholders
- 1.8Scope and Delimitations in Using AI for Cost Estimation
- 1.9Limitations Encountered in Data and Model Implementation
- 1.10Organisation of the Thesis on AI Cost Estimation Evaluation
- 1.11Operational Definitions of Key Terms in AI and Cost Estimation
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Framework for AI in Quantity Surveying
- 2.2Theoretical Foundations Supporting AI in Construction Cost Estimation
2.
- 2.1Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
2.
- 2.2Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT)
- 2.3Empirical Studies on AI Accuracy in Building Cost Estimation
- 2.4Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. AI-based Estimation Methods
- 2.5Critical Review of AI Algorithms Used in Cost Prediction
- 2.6Data Quality and Its Impact on AI Prediction Accuracy
- 2.7Challenges and Limitations Reported in Prior AI Cost Estimation Studies
- 2.8Identified Gaps in Existing Research on AI Estimation Precision
- 2.9Integration of AI with Existing Quantity Surveying Practices
- 2.10Summary of the Review: Strengths and Weaknesses of Current Knowledge
- 2.11Conceptual Model Illustrating AI Estimation Accuracy Factors
- 2.12Summary and Development of the Research Framework
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design for Evaluating AI in Cost Estimation
- 3.2Underlying Philosophical Paradigm of the Study: Pragmatism
- 3.3Population of the Study: Construction Companies and Quantity Surveyors
- 3.4Sample Size Determination and Selection via Stratified Random Sampling
- 3.5Data Collection Sources: Historical Project Data and AI Model Outputs
- 3.6Data Collection Instruments: AI Prediction Tools and Structured Questionnaires
- 3.7Validity and Reliability Measures for Data and Model Instruments
- 3.8Data Analysis Techniques: Descriptive, Inferential, and Predictive Analytics
- 3.9Analytical Framework: Regression Analysis and Model Accuracy Metrics
- 3.10Ethical Considerations in Data Handling and AI Usage
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS, AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Presentation of Descriptive Characteristics of Data Sets
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of AI Prediction Results vs. Actual Costs
- 4.3Testing of Hypotheses on AI Prediction Accuracy
- 4.4Interpretation of Model Performance (e.g., MAPE, RMSE, R-squared)
- 4.5Evaluation of Variance in Estimation Accuracy Across Project Types
- 4.6Comparative Discussion with Traditional Cost Estimating Methods
- 4.7Insights on Factors Influencing AI Prediction Accuracy
- 4.8Contextual Discussion in Relation to Literature Review Findings
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Key Findings on AI Estimation Accuracy
- 5.2Conclusions on AI Effectiveness in Building Cost Prediction
- 5.3Contribution of the Study to Quantity Surveying and Construction Management Literature
- 5.4Practical Recommendations for Industry Adoption of AI in Cost Estimation
- 5.5Suggestions for Improving AI Models and Data Quality
- 5.6Limitations of the Study and Their Impact
- 5.7Recommendations for Future Research on AI-Based Cost Estimation
Thesis Abstract
Accurate building cost estimation is critical for effective project planning and financial management within the construction industry, yet traditional methods often suffer from inaccuracies and inefficiencies, leading to cost overruns and project delays. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into quantity surveying practices offers promising potential to enhance the precision and efficiency of cost estimates; however, systematic evaluation of AI-powered estimation tools remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of AI-driven building cost estimation systems relative to conventional methods, with a focus on identifying factors influencing their performance and assessing their practical applicability within diverse construction contexts. The specific objectives are to compare the accuracy levels of AI-based estimations with traditional techniques; to examine the influence of project-specific variables on AI estimation accuracy; to develop a predictive model outlining the key determinants of AI system performance; and to evaluate the perceptions of quantity surveyors regarding the usability and reliability of AI tools. A descriptive comparative research design will be adopted, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods to ensure a comprehensive analysis. The target population comprises professional quantity surveyors, project managers, and construction cost consultants actively engaged in cost estimation within a metropolitan region with a robust construction industry. A stratified random sampling technique will be employed to select a sample of 150 participants, ensuring representation across different organizational sizes and project types. Data will be collected through structured questionnaires to gauge perceptions of AI tool usability and reliability, as well as semi-structured interviews for deeper insights; additionally, a dataset of 300 past cost estimates generated via both traditional and AI-based methods will be compiled for quantitative analysis. The study will utilize statistical techniques such as paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots to compare estimation accuracies, supplemented by multivariate regression analysis to identify significant predictors of AI estimation performance. Theories underpinning the research include the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to understand user acceptance of AI tools, and the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) to interpret behavioral influences on technology adoption. The validity and reliability of research instruments will be established through pilot testing, Cronbach’s alpha, and expert reviews. Data analysis will be conducted using SPSS and NVivo software, with quantitative data analyzed via descriptive and inferential statistics, and qualitative data through thematic analysis to extract key themes from interview transcripts. Expected findings include a statistically significant improvement in estimation accuracy with AI systems compared to conventional methods, particularly in projects with high variability in scope and complexity. Additionally, the study predicts that factors such as data quality, algorithm transparency, and user training significantly influence AI estimation performance. Perceptions from industry practitioners are anticipated to reveal both optimism regarding AI capabilities and concerns related to trust, interpretability, and integration into existing workflows. The study aims to contribute to the theoretical understanding of technological innovation adoption in quantity surveying by extending existing models with context-specific variables, and to offer practical insights for industry stakeholders seeking to leverage AI for cost estimation. The main conclusion underscores the potential of AI to enhance accuracy and efficiency in building cost estimation, provided that critical factors influencing performance are adequately managed. Recommendations include developing standardized protocols for AI system deployment, improving user training programs, and fostering industry-academic collaborations to refine AI algorithms based on real-world data. The study also advocates for further longitudinal research to monitor evolving AI capabilities and their long-term impact on quantity surveying practices, ultimately guiding policy formulation and strategic decision-making in construction cost management.
Thesis Overview
This research is focused on examining how accurately artificial intelligence (AI) tools can estimate building costs in the field of quantity surveying. Cost estimation is essential in construction projects because it influences budgeting, planning, and overall project success. Traditionally, quantity surveyors rely on manual techniques or basic software, but recent advances in AI promise to improve the speed and accuracy of these estimates. The research aims to evaluate whether AI-based estimation methods outperform conventional approaches and to identify their strengths and limitations.
The primary problem the study addresses is the lack of comprehensive evidence on the accuracy and reliability of AI-powered cost estimation tools in real-world projects. Despite the growing adoption of AI, many practitioners remain uncertain about its practical effectiveness, which potentially hinders broader use. The research will explore whether AI can provide more precise estimates that could lead to better financial planning and risk management in construction.
The researcher will follow these steps: First, they will review existing literature on AI in quantity surveying to understand current capabilities and gaps. Next, they will select a sample of 50 recent construction projects from a construction firm known for using AI tools, collecting data on initial AI-generated estimates and actual project costs. They will use statistical techniques such as regression analysis and paired t-tests to compare estimated versus actual costs to determine accuracy levels. The study might also include expert interviews to gain insights into practical challenges and acceptance.
The expected contribution of this study is to provide evidence-based insights into the effectiveness of AI for cost estimation, helping quantity surveyors and project managers to make informed decisions about integrating AI tools into their workflow. The findings are anticipated to show that AI can significantly improve estimate accuracy, but with some limitations depending on project complexity and data quality. The study aims to support more widespread adoption of AI in quantity surveying, ultimately enhancing project efficiency and cost control.