AI-Enabled Strategic Sourcing Complexity Reduction in Public Sector
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: AI-Driven Strategic Sourcing in Public Procurement
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Complexity in Public Sector Procurement
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities Theory
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework
- 2.5Empirical Review: AI Adoption in Public Sector Procurement Practices
- 2.6Empirical Review: Sourcing Strategy Optimization through Machine Learning
- 2.7Empirical Review: Risk, Compliance, and Transparency in AI-Enabled Sourcing
- 2.8Empirical Review: Data Quality and Integration in Public Procurement Systems
- 2.9Empirical Review: Supplier Relationship Management with AI Tools
- 2.10Empirical Review: Change Management and Stakeholder Acceptance
- 2.11Identified Gaps in the Literature on AI-Enabled Sourcing Complexity
- 2.12Conceptual Model or Synthesis of Findings
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Mixed-Methods Approach for AI-Enabled Sourcing
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in Public Sector ICT Research
- 3.3Population of the Study: Public Procurement Agencies and Suppliers
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified and Purposive Sampling
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Surveys, Interviews, System Logs
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Content, Construct, and Reliability Testing
- 3.7Data Collection Procedures: Access, Permissions, and Data Handling
- 3.8Data Analysis Methods: Descriptive, Inferential Statistics, and ML Interpretability
- 3.9Model Specification or Analytical Framework: AI-Driven Sourcing Optimization Model
- 3.10Ethical Considerations: Privacy, Bias, and Public Accountability
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Descriptive Overview of Respondents and Systems
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: AI Maturity and Complexity Indicators
- 4.3Hypotheses Testing: Impact of AI on Sourcing Lead Times
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Effect on Compliance and Transparency
- 4.5Hypotheses Testing: Supplier Risk and Performance with AI Tools
- 4.6Interpretation of Results: Alignment with Dynamic Capabilities and TO(E) Frameworks
- 4.7Discussion of Findings in Relation to Conceptual Model
- 4.8Synthesis with Prior Empirical Evidence and Implications
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Theoretical and Practical Implications
- 5.4Recommendations for Public Sector AI-Enabled Sourcing Practice
- 5.5Recommendations for Policy and Governance
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
The public sector routinely confronts procurement complexity arising from fragmented supplier ecosystems, opaque governance structures, and evolving regulatory demands, all of which impede timely and value-driven sourcing decisions. This study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions can reduce strategic sourcing complexity within public procurement, with the aim of enhancing transparency, efficiency, and value realization. The research objectives are to (1) identify AI-enabled mechanisms that disrupt conventional sourcing complexity, (2) evaluate the impact of these mechanisms on procurement cycle time, cost savings, and supplier diversity, (3) examine governance and risk considerations associated with AI adoption in public sourcing, and (4) develop a contextual framework for deploying AI-infused strategic sourcing in public sector organizations. A mixed-methods research design integrates quantitative and qualitative strands to capture measurable performance improvements and contextual insights. The population comprises public sector procurement units across five metropolitan municipalities and three regional government departments. A purposive sample of 40 procurement offices is selected, yielding 200 completed procurement process records and 60 semi-structured interviews with senior procurement officers, category managers, and IT governance leads. Data collection employs (i) structured procurement process dashboards and archival records to quantify cycle time, bid rigour, cost savings, and supplier concentration, and (ii) semi-structured interviews and focus groups to elicit experiences, perceived complexity drivers, and governance controls. Instrument validity is established through expert review by seven procurement scholars and four AI ethics specialists, with reliability assessed via Cronbach’s alpha for survey items (target >0.80). Analytical methods consist of (i) multivariate regression to identify the relationship between AI-enabled features (predictive analytics, automated supplier segmentation, dynamic risk scoring, and conversational AI-supported due diligence) and performance outcomes (cycle time, total cost of ownership, and supplier diversity), controlling for organization size and sectoral constraints; (ii) interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate changes in performance trajectories before and after AI deployment; (iii) thematic analysis of interview transcripts to extract recurrent themes related to adoption barriers, governance, and perceived risks; and (iv) structural equation modeling to test the theoretical pathways linking AI capabilities, process complexity reduction, and procurement performance. The study integrates information processing theory and the resource-based view to interpret how AI-enabled information processing reduces cognitive and organizational complexity and how this translates into competitive public value. Expected findings indicate that AI-enabled features significantly shorten procurement cycles by 18–25%, improve bid quality through enhanced supplier pre-qualification, and increase supplier diversity by 10–15% in selected categories. Dynamic risk scoring is anticipated to reduce non-compliant supplier engagement and lower incident-driven delays. However, findings may reveal that governance and ethical considerations—such as algorithmic bias, data quality, and transparency requirements—moderate the strength of these effects, necessitating robust governance artifacts, explainable AI interfaces, and continuous auditing. The study contributes to knowledge by (i) operationalizing a comprehensive AI-enabled strategic sourcing framework tailored to public sector contexts, (ii) providing empirical estimates of AI’s impact on key procurement performance metrics, and (iii) detailing governance configurations that balance efficiency with accountability and public trust. The theoretical contribution lies in integrating information processing theory with the resource-based view to articulate a mechanism by which AI reduces complexity in strategic sourcing and generates organizational capabilities in public sector procurement. Practically, the research informs policy-makers and procurement leaders on selecting AI-enabled modules, designing governance controls, and sequencing implementation to maximize value while mitigating risks. Recommendations include establishing standardized data governance protocols, adopting explainable AI dashboards for decision transparency, creating cross-agency AI steering committees, and piloting AI capabilities within high-volume, low-variance categories before scaling. The study concludes that when deployed with rigorous governance, transparent accountability mechanisms, and continuous performance monitoring, AI-enabled strategic sourcing can meaningfully reduce structural complexity in the public sector and deliver measurable improvements in efficiency, integrity, and value realization.
Thesis Overview
This research investigates how artificial intelligence can simplify and streamline strategic sourcing processes within public sector organizations, where procurement decisions are often complex due to regulatory constraints, multiple stakeholder interests, and large supplier networks. The central idea is to identify how AI-driven tools can reduce decision-making complexity, improve supplier selection, and enhance value for taxpayers without compromising transparency and accountability.
Why it matters: Public sector procurement is typically slower and more opaque than private-sector purchasing, leading to higher costs and less optimal outcomes. By understanding how AI can support strategic sourcing—covering supplier market analysis, risk assessment, contract optimization, and performance monitoring—the study aims to offer practical guidance for implementing technology-enabled improvements that maintain public trust and compliance.
Problem and gap: While AI has shown promise in procurement in private firms, there is limited evidence on its effectiveness, challenges, and governance in public sector contexts. Gaps include understanding which AI capabilities deliver the greatest value under public procurement rules, how to align AI with transparency and audit requirements, and how organizational culture and data quality affect outcomes.
What the researcher will do (step by step):
- Clarify research scope and select a public sector case study or multiple comparable agencies.
- Develop a conceptual framework linking AI capabilities (e.g., predictive analytics, natural language processing, decision-support systems) to sourcing outcomes (cost savings, cycle time, supplier diversity, risk management).
- Collect data through documents, procurement performance metrics, and semi-structured interviews with procurement officials, suppliers, and auditors.
- Build a dataset of supplier evaluations, contract awards, and performance indicators, supplemented by qualitative insights.
- Analyze data using mixed methods: descriptive statistics to map current complexity levels, regression analysis to test links between AI usage and outcomes, and thematic analysis of interview transcripts to capture governance and ethical considerations.
- Validate findings via triangulation and, if feasible, simulation of decision-support scenarios.
Expected contribution: The study will extend knowledge on how AI can practically reduce complexity in public sector sourcing while ensuring compliance, transparency, and accountability. It will provide a framework for selecting AI tools aligned with regulatory constraints and offer guidelines for data quality, governance, and change management.
Anticipated outcomes: Clear evidence on which AI capabilities most effectively streamline strategic sourcing, a set of best-practice recommendations for public agencies, and a roadmap for phased AI adoption that minimizes risk and maximizes value.