Integrated Surfactant-Polymer Flooding for Cyclic Steam-Assisted Schemes: Design, Implementation, Evaluation
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Surfactant-Polymer Flooding and Cyclic Steam-Assisted Schemes
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Integrated EOR Schemes in Heavy-Oil Reservoirs
- 2.3Conceptual Review: Thermal-Fluid Interactions in SURF-Poly Flooding
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Solubility, Diffusion, and Interfacial Tension Reduction Theories
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: Additive Synergy and Pore-Scale Transport Theories
- 2.6Theoretical Framework: Reservoir Performance Modeling Theories (Black-Oil, compositional, and hybrid models)
- 2.7Empirical Review: Field Trials of Surfactant-Polymer Flooding
- 2.8Empirical Review: Cyclic Steam Stimulation and Operative Parameters
- 2.9Empirical Review: Surfactant and Polymer Selection in High-Temperature Reservoirs
- 2.10Empirical Review: Temperature-Dependent Viscosity and Rock-Fluid Interactions
- 2.11Empirical Review: Polymer Adsorption, Retention, and Injectivity Issues
- 2.12Empirical Review: Environmental and Economic Considerations in Integrated EOR
- 2.13Gaps in the Literature
- 2.14Conceptual Model of Integrated SURF-Poly Flooding in CSTS Context
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Framework for Integrated SURF-Poly Flooding in CSTS
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism with Mixed Methods Justification
- 3.3Population of the Study: Reservoirs with CSTS-Applicable Conditions
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Selection of Laboratory Cores, Numerical Models, and Field Case Studies
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Core Flood Experiments, CT Imaging, Rheology, and Simulation Models
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Calibration Protocols and Reproducibility Checks
- 3.7Data Processing and Analysis Plan: Descriptive, Inferential, and Sensitivity Analyses
- 3.8Model Specification or Analytical Framework: Coupled Thermal-Fluid-Chemical Reaction Model for SURF-Poly in CSTS
- 3.9Ethical Considerations: Safety, Environmental Compliance, and Data Integrity
- 3.10Research Workflow and Timeline
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Laboratory Core-Flood Results for SURF-Poly under CSTS Conditions
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Fluid Properties, Wettability, and Interfacial Tension Changes
- 4.3Hypotheses Testing: Effect of Polymer Concentration on Oil Recovery under CSTS
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Surfactant Type and Thermal Stability on Flood Performance
- 4.5Numerical Simulation Results: History Matching and Forecasts for Integrated Scheme
- 4.6Model Validation: Laboratory-to-Field Extrapolation and Uncertainty Quantification
- 4.7Interpretation of Results: Mechanistic Insight into Synergistic EOR Processes
- 4.8Discussion of Findings in Relation to Reviewed Literature
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications for CSTS Operations
- 5.5Recommendations for Field Implementation and Process Optimization
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
Integrated Surfactant-Polymer Flooding for Cyclic Steam-Assisted Schemes Design, Implementation, Evaluation This study addresses the low recovery efficiency and high steam–oil ratio challenges in mature heavy oil reservoirs by integrating surfactant-polymer flooding with cyclic steam-assisted schemes to enhance sweep efficiency and mobility control while reducing thermal penalties. The aim is to design, implement, and evaluate an integrated EOR (enhanced oil recovery) strategy that couples surfactant/polymer flooding with cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) to maximize oil recovery, minimize energy intensity, and improve reservoir conformance. Specific objectives include (i) formulating a robust chemical system comprising a compatible surfactant and polymer for high-temperature, high-salinity conditions typical of CSS cycles; (ii) developing a workflow for sequencing and timing of CSS with polymer-surfactant (SP) injections to optimize micro- and macro-scale displacement; (iii) evaluating reservoir performance through laboratory coreflood experiments, numerical simulation, and sensitivity analyses; (iv) establishing optimal operating windows for chemical concentrations, injection rates, and steam cycles; and (v) providing implementation guidelines for field pilots, including economic and environmental implications. A mixed-methods approach underpins the methodology. The research adopts a design-based experimental framework complemented by a reservoir simulation component. Laboratory work utilizes high-temperature, high-salinity corefloods with Berea sandstone and oil taps to mimic reservoir conditions up to 250°C and salinity levels of 150,000–250,000 ppm. Surfactant and polymer formulations are selected based on interfacial tension reductions to below 10?3 mN/m, favorable viscosity enhancement, and thermal stability, drawing on amphiphilic polymer-surfactant systems with partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide and alkyl benzene sulfonate-based surfactants. The sample consists of 12 core plugs, each subjected to a baseline CSS cycle followed by SP-assisted CSS cycles, with triplicate runs to assess reproducibility. Data collection instruments include high-temperature core flood rigs, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) porosity measurements, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for thermal stability, and real-time pressure transducers for breakthrough curves. A numerical model will be constructed in CMG STARS to couple polymer dynamics, surfactant transport, and steam heat transfer, calibrated against experimental data. The population of interest comprises mature heavy oil reservoirs amenable to CSS, with sampling focusing on geochemical compatibility and field-scale transition probabilities. Data analysis proceeds in three tiers. First, descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) assess coreflood performance across formulations and cycle sequences. Second, regression analysis and response surface methodology identify the relationships between chemical concentrations, steam pulse duration, and incremental oil recovery. Third, sensitivity analyses in the numerical model quantify the impact of key parameters, including adsorption losses, phase behavior, and mobility ratio alterations, validating a conceptual framework grounded in the theories of relative permeability alteration and thermal diffusion enhancement. The study tests hypotheses related to incremental recovery gains from SP-CSS integration, the trade-offs between chemical cost and oil gained, and the robustness of the approach under salinity and temperature variability. Anticipated findings include substantial improvements in cumulative oil recovery relative to CSS alone, driven by reduced interfacial tension, improved mobility control, and enhanced sweep efficiency within burn zones. The combination is expected to produce a favorable incremental oil recovery in the range of 8–15% OOIP under field-representative conditions, with steam–chemical synergy reducing peak steam ratio by 10–20% and lowering bypassed oil. The research contributes to knowledge by operationalizing an integrated design framework for SP-assisted CSS, providing validated SEM and PFR (specific enthalpy management) indicators for field deployment, and detailing criteria for chemical selection, cycle sequencing, and economic viability. The study concludes that the integrated scheme offers a viable pathway to rehabilitate depleted heavy oil reservoirs when designed with site-specific temperature, salinity, and rock–fluid properties. Recommendations include guidelines for pilot validation, optimization of chemical costs, monitoring strategies for reservoir cleanliness and stability, and policy implications for environmental performance and lifecycle assessment.
Thesis Overview
Integrated Surfactant-Polymer Flooding for Cyclic Steam-Assisted Schemes: Design, Implementation, Evaluation
This research explores an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) approach that combines surfactant-polymer flooding with cyclic steam-assisted schemes (CSS) to improve reservoir sweep efficiency and oil recovery in thermal-heavy oil plays. The core idea is to inject a chemical slug that reduces interfacial tension and improves mobility control, followed by cyclic steam injections that heat the reservoir to mobilize viscous oil, while the polymer component helps maintain favorable mobility ratios and displace oil more uniformly.
Why it matters: In heavy and viscous oil reservoirs, traditional steam-assisted methods alone face challenges such as early thermal breakthroughs, high water-cut, and poor sweep efficiency. Integrated chemical flooding can potentially lower oil viscosity, stabilize displacements, and extend the effective steam window, leading to higher ultimate recovery and lower water production. The study addresses gaps in understanding the synergistic effects of combining surfactants, polymers, and cyclic steam in a single production scheme, including economic and environmental implications.
What the researcher will do, step by step:
- Literature synthesis to identify relevant surfactant and polymer formulations compatible with CSS temperatures and brine conditions.
- Conceptual design of an integrated CSS-Surfactant-Polymer (CSS-SP) scheme, including selection of slug sizes, injection sequences, and cycling schedules.
- Laboratory screening: evaluate interfacial tension reduction, rheology, and thermal stability of candidate chemicals using core samples derived from a representative heavy-oil reservoir.
- Pilot-scale testing: implement a field-representative model in a sandstone core holder, performing CSS cycles interspersed with chemical slug injections.
- Data collection: monitor oil recovery, pressure, temperature, polymer viscosity, and chemical concentrations; collect core effluent samples for compositional analysis.
- Data analysis: apply regression analysis to correlate recovery with injection parameters, ANOVA to compare performance across formulations, and reservoir simulations (using history-matching with a compositional simulator) to extrapolate field performance.
- Economic and environmental assessment: preliminary cost-benefit and emission considerations of the integrated scheme.
- Validation: compare experimental results with numerical model predictions to refine design guidelines.
Expected contributions and outcomes: a validated design framework for CSS-SP implementation, insights into optimal chemical formulations and cycling strategies, and guidance on practical deployment, including sensitivity to reservoir temperature, salinity, and rock properties. The study aims to advance knowledge on synergistic EOR methods and offer actionable recommendations for field pilots.