Assessment of Enhanced Oil Recovery Efficiency in Mature Fields via Long-Term Core Flooding Tests
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study: Long-Term Core Flooding in Mature Oil Fields
- 1.3Statement of the Problem: Challenges in Quantifying EOR Efficiency
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study: Evaluating EOR Techniques via Empirical Core Data
- 1.5Research Questions: Effectiveness and Practicality of Long-Term Core Flooding Tests
- 1.6Research Hypotheses: Correlations Between Core Flooding Metrics and EOR Outcomes
- 1.7Significance of the Study: Improving EOR Strategies in Mature Oil Fields
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study: Focus on Selected Mature Field and Specific EOR Methods
- 1.9Limitations of the Study: Access to Core Samples and Laboratory Constraints
- 1.10Organisation of the Study: Chapter Summaries and Logical Flow
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms: Key Concepts in EOR and Core Flooding Tests
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Framework of Enhanced Oil Recovery
- 2.2Overview of Core Flooding Techniques and Long-Term Testing
- 2.3Theoretical Foundations: Darcy’s Law and Pore-Scale Displacement Models
- 2.4Relevant Theories: Buckley-Leverett Flooding Theory and Rock-Fluid Interaction Models
- 2.5Empirical Studies on EOR Efficiency in Mature Fields
- 2.6Previous Laboratory and Field-Based Core Flooding Experiments
- 2.7Gaps in Literature: Long-Term Data Scarcity and Field Applicability
- 2.8Critical Review of EOR Technologies Tested via Core Flooding
- 2.9Summary of Findings from Past Research
- 2.10Conceptual Model for EOR Efficiency Evaluation
- 2.11Synthesis and Identification of Research Gaps
- 2.12Toward a Conceptual Framework for Empirical EOR Assessment
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design: Empirical Field-Based Core Flooding Investigation
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in Applied Petroleum Research
- 3.3Population of the Study: Mature Oil Field Core Samples and EOR Techniques
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Selection Criteria and Random Sampling
- 3.5Sources of Data: Core Samples, Laboratory Measurements, and Field Data
- 3.6Instruments of Data Collection: Core Flooding Apparatus and Data Logging Devices
- 3.7Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Calibration and Standard Protocols
- 3.8Data Analysis Methods: Quantitative Analysis using Statistical and Numerical Models
- 3.9Model Specification: Relative Permeability, Displacement Efficiency, and Recovery Metrics
- 3.10Ethical Considerations: Data Confidentiality and Laboratory Safety Protocols
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Core Flooding Results and Field Data Summary
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Distribution and Variability of Key Parameters
- 4.3Hypotheses Testing: Relationships Between Core Flooding Metrics and EOR Effectiveness
- 4.4Interpretation of Results: Core Displacement Efficiency and Residual Oil Saturation
- 4.5Comparative Analysis: EOR Performance in Different Core Samples
- 4.6Correlation with Literature: Alignment or Divergence from Prior Studies
- 4.7Discussion of Key Findings: Implications for EOR in Mature Fields
- 4.8Summary of Data-Driven Insights: Practical Recommendations for Field Application
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings: Core Flooding Effectiveness and EOR Metrics
- 5.2Conclusions: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Insights
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Advancing Empirical Methods for EOR Assessment
- 5.4Practical Recommendations: Optimizing EOR Strategies in Mature Fields
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies: Extended Field Validation and New EOR Technologies
Thesis Abstract
Mature oil fields face significant challenges in optimizing hydrocarbon recovery due to declining primary and secondary production, necessitating the evaluation of advanced Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques to maximize reservoir productivity and prolong field life. This study aims to empirically assess the efficiency of various EOR methods through long-term core flooding tests, providing quantitative insights into their effectiveness under reservoir-mimicking conditions. The specific objectives include determining the displacement efficiency of polymer flooding, surfactant injection, and thermal recovery; evaluating the impact of core properties on EOR performance; and developing predictive models to estimate recovery outcomes based on core characteristics and flooding parameters. A mixed-method research design integrates experimental laboratory procedures with statistical analysis. The study population comprises core samples obtained from mature fields, with a total of 45 core plugs representing different lithologies—siltstone, sandstone, and shale—classified into three groups for testing. Sampling employed stratified random selection to ensure representative diversity across reservoirs. Data collection involved tightly controlled core flooding experiments conducted over a three-year period, simulating reservoir conditions of pressure, temperature, and salinity. Multiple EOR techniques—polymer flooding, surfactant flooding, and thermal methods—were applied sequentially to each core sample, with displacement efficiency recorded through differential pressure and effluent analysis. Analytical techniques include high-resolution differential pressure transducers, effluent oil and water analysis via gas chromatography, and core wettability assessments through contact angle measurements. Data were processed using regression analysis to establish relationships between core properties and recovery efficiency, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tested for statistically significant differences among EOR methods across lithologies. Additionally, multivariate statistical models, incorporating principal component analysis (PCA), were developed to identify the most influential factors affecting recovery. The study also references the theory of wettability alteration and flow mechanics to interpret core flooding results, providing a theoretical basis for observed variations in EOR performance. Expected findings suggest that polymer flooding yields the highest incremental recovery in sandstone cores, with an average increment of 15%, whereas surfactant flooding offers moderate improvements of about 8%, predominantly in siltstone. Thermal recovery methods show variable results depending on core lithology, with shale cores exhibiting lower recovery efficiencies due to their low permeability. Crucially, core wettability and porosity significantly influence EOR effectiveness, with more oil-wet, high-porosity cores demonstrating superior displacement efficiency. Predictive models developed from the analysis aim to accurately forecast recovery factors based on core and operational parameters, thereby aiding reservoir management decisions. This research contributes novel empirical data on the performance of different EOR techniques under long-term flooding conditions, filling identified gaps in the literature that predominantly rely on short-term laboratory tests or field-scale pilot studies. The integration of experimental results with statistical modeling advances understanding of the complex interactions between reservoir properties and EOR processes, enabling more informed field application. Furthermore, the study offers a framework for optimizing EOR strategies tailored to specific lithological and petrophysical characteristics of mature fields, promoting enhanced recovery with economically and environmentally sustainable practices. The main conclusion emphasizes the importance of core-specific evaluation in EOR planning, advocating for tailored recovery strategies based on detailed core analysis and long-term testing. Recommendations include adopting a combination of polymer and surfactant flooding in sandstone-dominated reservoirs and considering thermal methods where geological conditions support thermal energy retention. It also suggests further research into nanotechnology-enhanced EOR agents and the development of real-time monitoring techniques to optimize injection parameters dynamically, ultimately extending the productive lifespan of mature oil fields.
Thesis Overview
This research focuses on improving the extraction of oil from mature oil fields where traditional recovery methods have already been heavily used and most of the easily accessible oil has been recovered. Over time, oil reservoirs lose their primary pressure and natural drive, making it difficult to extract the remaining oil. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods aim to recover more oil by injecting substances like water, gas, or chemicals into the reservoir. However, understanding how effective these methods are in long-term scenarios specific to mature fields is still limited. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency and viability of different EOR techniques in such settings through detailed laboratory tests.
The researcher will carry out long-term core flooding experiments, which involve simulating reservoir conditions using core samples from actual mature fields. The steps include selecting representative core samples, preparing them for testing, and then injecting various EOR agents under controlled conditions over extended periods. Data on fluid flow, pressure changes, and residual oil saturation will be collected at regular intervals using specialized instruments. The analysis will involve statistical techniques such as regression analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess the effectiveness of each EOR method over time.
The study seeks to fill a knowledge gap concerning how different EOR techniques perform over long durations in mature reservoirs. It will contribute new insights into the technical feasibility, recovery efficiency, and economic considerations of applying EOR in longstanding fields. The expected outcome is an improved understanding of which EOR methods are most effective in prolonging recovery in mature fields, along with practical recommendations for reservoir engineers and policymakers. Overall, the research aims to support better decision-making in the management of depleted oil fields, ultimately enhancing their productivity and extending their operational life.