A Multiscale Framework for Predicting Reservoir Drainage Dynamics Under Uncertainty
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Multiscale Dynamics in Reservoir Drainage
- 2.2Theoretical Framework: Multiscale Modeling Theory and Uncertainty Quantification
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Stochastic Homogenization and Upscaling for Porous Media
- 2.4Empirical Review: Field-Scale Drainage Dynamics Studies under Uncertainty
- 2.5Empirical Review: Pore-Scale to Field-Scale Upscaling Methodologies
- 2.6Empirical Review: Reservoir Simulation Approaches for Drainage Forecasting
- 2.7Empirical Review: Uncertainty Propagation in Multiphase Flow Simulations
- 2.8Empirical Review: Data-Driven Surrogates for Multiscale Reservoir Models
- 2.9Gaps in Theoretical Foundations for Merged Scales
- 2.10Gaps in Empirical Validation Across Scales
- 2.11Conceptual Model or Summary of the Review
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design: Develop a Multiscale Modeling Framework with Uncertainty Quantification
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism with Computational Realism
- 3.3Population of the Study: Representative Reservoir Analogues and Field Data Sets
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified Selection of Geological Scenarios
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Core Samples, Core-Scale Experiments, Field Production Data, and Numerical Simulations
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Cross-Validation, Benchmarking, and Sensitivity Analysis
- 3.7Data Preprocessing and Quality Control
- 3.8Model Specification: Coupled Multiscale Transport and Uncertainty Propagation Equations
- 3.9Analytical Framework: Upscaling Operators and Stochastic Surrogate Models
- 3.10Calibration, Validation, and Verification Procedures
- 3.11Ethical Considerations in Data Use and Industry Collaboration
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Multiscale Pressure-Volume-Subjective Drainage Indicators
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Baseline Reservoir Properties Across Scales
- 4.3Hypotheses Testing: Effect of Geological Heterogeneity on Drainage Rates under Uncertainty
- 4.4Interpretation of Results: Scale-Dependent Drainage Dynamics and Uncertainty Bounds
- 4.5Discussion of Findings in Relation to Conceptual Framework
- 4.6Model Performance Evaluation: Accuracy, Robustness, and Computational Efficiency
- 4.7Sensitivity Analysis Results and Key Governing Parameters
- 4.8Implications for Field-Scale Reservoir Management
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: The Multiscale Framework and Uncertainty Quantification for Reservoir Drainage
- 5.4Recommendations for Practice and Industry Application
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
This study addresses the escalating uncertainty in reservoir drainage dynamics arising from multiscale heterogeneities, complex fluid–rock interactions, and stochastic operational conditions that challenge conventional reservoir models. The aim is to develop a multiscale predictive framework that integrates pore-scale processes with continuum-scale behavior to quantify drainage trajectories and associated uncertainty under varying production scenarios. The specific objectives are (1) to quantify the influence of pore-scale heterogeneity on macro-scale drainage rates using upscaling via homogenization and volume averaging; (2) to develop a probabilistic multiscale model that couples stochastic input parameters (permeability, capillary pressure, and oil–water interfacial tension) with deterministic Darcy-based flow, enabling predictions with quantified uncertainty; (3) to implement Bayesian calibration and data assimilation to update model states using historical production data from 12 representative reservoirs; (4) to evaluate the framework against observed drainage metrics (pressure drawdown, cumulative oil production, and water cut) under multiple operational strategies (waterflooding, enhanced oil recovery, and primary depletion); and (5) to propose a decision-support tool for uncertainty-aware optimization of drainage pathways. The methodology adopts a mixed-methods, model-driven research design anchored in hemispherical multiscale theory and stochastic processes. The population comprises reservoir rock-fluid systems characterized by heterogeneous grain-scale features and field-scale drainage behavior. A purposive sampling approach selects 12 well-documented reservoirs across carbonate and sandstone formations with diversified depth, porosity, and heterogeneity indices to ensure generalizability. Data collection relies on (i) petrophysical logs (porosity, permeability, capillary pressure data), (ii) core measurements (pore throat size distributions, wettability indices, relative permeability curves), (iii) production history (time-series data of pressure, rate, oil-water ratio for at least five years per reservoir), and (iv) seismic attributes for spatial heterogeneity context. Instrumentation includes high-resolution micro-CT imaging for representative elementary volume (REV) analysis and standard coreflood experimental rigs to characterize drainage under controlled conditions. The analytical framework comprises three integrated components. First, a multiscale upscaling module employs homogenization and volume averaging to derive effective continuum equations that retain pore-scale drainage signatures, with uncertainty propagation via stochastic permeability fields described by Gaussian random fields. Second, a probabilistic predictive engine uses Bayesian hierarchical modeling to fuse prior information with data and to calibrate parameters such as effective permeability, capillary pressure-saturation relationships, and interfacial tension. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, specifically the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS), and Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) data assimilation are applied to update state estimates as new production data arrive. Third, a decision-support layer integrates the calibrated multiscale model with trajectory optimization under uncertainty, using stochastic optimization and Bayesian decision theory to generate production schedules that minimize uncertainty in drainage forecasts while maximizing net present value. Analytical techniques include regression analysis to identify scaling laws across scales, ANOVA to assess the significance of different heterogeneity descriptors, and sensitivity analyses (Sobol indices) to quantify parameter influence. The model specification aligns with a coupled Darcy flow–multiscale transport framework, augmented by a stochastic volatility component to capture operational perturbations. Expected findings include (i) robust quantification of how microstructural traits influence macro-scale drainage rates and uncertainty envelopes; (ii) validated multiscale upscaling schemes with predictive intervals that outperform single-scale models under posterior predictive checks; (iii) demonstrable improvements in reservoir drainage forecasts when integrating data assimilation with history matching across multiple wells; and (iv) actionable recommendations for uncertainty-aware production planning, including threshold-based decision rules for switching drainage strategies. The study contributes to knowledge by bridging pore-to-field scale drainage dynamics under uncertainty through a coherent multiscale, probabilistic framework, advancing theoretical understanding of upscaling under stochastic inputs and providing a practical tool for operators. The main conclusion anticipates that incorporating explicit multiscale heterogeneity and Bayesian data assimilation yields predictive confidence improvements and more resilient drainage strategies, with recommendations emphasizing routine acquisition of high-resolution petrophysical data, integration of seismic-informed heterogeneity metrics, and continuous updating of model states via real-time production data.
Thesis Overview
This research addresses how to predict how oil and gas reservoirs drain over time when there is uncertainty in the system, such as variations in rock properties, fluid behavior, and operational decisions. The goal is to develop a multiscale framework that links pore-scale processes to field-scale drainage dynamics, capturing how small-scale heterogeneity and stochastic factors influence large-scale recovery and pressure decline. This matters because inaccurate predictions can lead to suboptimal development plans, inefficient resource use, and higher financial and environmental risk.
The problem or knowledge gap is that existing models often assume homogeneous rocks or rely on single-scale descriptions, which fail to represent how microscale wetting, mineral dissolution, and fracture networks interact with reservoir flow under uncertainty. A robust multiscale approach that propagates uncertainty across scales is needed to improve forecasting of drainage rates, breakthrough times, and ultimate recovery under realistic, variable conditions.
Research steps:
1) Define the multiscale framework and select representative models for pore-scale (Capillary pressure, relative permeability), core-scale (history-matching with stochastic properties), and field-scale (dynamic drainage under uncertainty).
2) Assemble a dataset from synthetic simulations and published field cases, including variables such as porosity, permeability distributions, initial saturations, and uncertainty bounds. Target sample: 30–50 field cases plus 1000–1500 synthetic realizations.
3) Develop a hierarchical surrogate modelling approach (e.g., variational inference or sparse Bayesian learning) to propagate uncertainty from the pore scale to the field scale.
4) Use regression-based sensitivity analysis and ANOVA to identify dominant parameters affecting drainage dynamics.
5) Validate the framework against independent field data and perform scenario analysis to test robustness under different uncertainty levels.
6) Assess predictive performance with metrics such as root-mean-square error, R-squared, and predictive intervals.
Expected contribution:
- A cohesive, scalable framework that couples pore-, core-, and field-scale models under uncertainty to predict reservoir drainage dynamics more reliably.
- Transparent quantification of uncertainty and identification of key controlling parameters, aiding decision-making in development planning.
Possible outcomes:
- Improved forecasts of drainage rates and recovery factors with quantified uncertainty, and guidelines for when simplified models suffice versus when multiscale modelling is essential.