AI-assisted personalized physical education for inclusive classrooms
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: AI-Driven Personalization in Physical Education
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Inclusive Education and PE Inclusion Dynamics
- 2.3Conceptual Review: ICT Tools in PE Assessment and Feedback
- 2.4Conceptual Review: Adaptive Skill Progression and Motor Learning Theories
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: Self-Determination Theory in AI-Enhanced PE
- 2.6Theoretical Framework: Technology Acceptance Model for Educational Technologies in PE
- 2.7Empirical Review Part A: AI in Personalization of Physical Activity Programs
- 2.8Empirical Review Part B: Data-Driven Feedback and Motivation in PE
- 2.9Empirical Review Part C: Accessibility and Inclusion Through Digital PE Solutions
- 2.10Identified Gaps in the Literature
- 2.11Conceptual Model or Summary of the Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Mixed-Methods Design for AI-Driven PE Personalization
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in Educational Technology Research
- 3.3Population of the Study: Students with Diverse Abilities in Secondary PE
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments
- 3.7Data Collection Procedures
- 3.8Data Analysis Plan: Quantitative and Qualitative Techniques
- 3.9Model Specification: AI Personalization Algorithm Evaluation Framework
- 3.10Ethical Considerations
- 3.11Rigor, Reflexivity, and Trustworthiness
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation Framework
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of Participant Demographics and PE Engagement
- 4.3Descriptive Analysis of AI-Generated Personalization Outputs
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Impact on Engagement and Inclusion Metrics
- 4.5Inferential Analysis: Performance Progression Across Ability Groups
- 4.6Qualitative Findings: Teacher and Student Experiences with AI-PE Tools
- 4.7Interpretation of Results: Alignment with Theoretical Frameworks
- 4.8Discussion of Findings in Relation to the Reviewed Literature
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications for Policy and Practice
- 5.5Recommendations for Stakeholders (Educators, Technologists, Administrators)
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
The present study addresses the persistent inequities in physical education (PE) experiences for students with diverse abilities by examining how AI-assisted personalized PE can enhance participation, engagement, and learning outcomes in inclusive classroom settings. Despite policy mandates for inclusive education, traditional PE often fails to accommodate individual differences in physical ability, motivation, and prior skill levels, leading to disengagement and suboptimal health trajectories. This research aims to investigate how AI-driven adaptive instruction, performance feedback, and activity tailoring can create equitable PE opportunities for all students. The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of an AI-enabled PE platform in delivering individualized curricula that align with students’ motor competencies, preferences, and disability considerations, while maintaining core fitness and psychosocial objectives. Specific objectives include (i) determining whether AI personalization improves objective motor skill competence (MSA scores) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels compared with standard PE; (ii) examining changes in student motivation, self-efficacy, and inclusion perceptions; and (iii) identifying teacher experiences, perceived feasibility, and classroom dynamics when integrating AI-assisted instruction. A mixed-methods design will be employed in a three-phase study conducted over an academic year. The quantitative strand will use a quasi-experimental design with two middle-school PE classes (n = 48 students; 24 per class), randomly assigned to AI-assisted personalized PE (n = 24) and conventional PE (n = 24). Data collection will include validated motor skill assessments (Test of Gross Motor Development–Third Edition), accelerometer-derived MVPA (taken during three 20-minute PE sessions per term), and standardized questionnaires measuring intrinsic motivation (Intrinsic Motivation Inventory), self-efficacy for physical activity (Children’s Self-Perception of Physical Activity Scale), and perceived inclusivity (Perceived Classroom Inclusion Scale). Data will be analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) controlling for baseline scores, with post hoc pairwise comparisons and effect sizes reported. A longitudinal growth model will assess trajectories across terms. The qualitative strand will involve semi-structured interviews and focused group discussions with students (n = 12), PE teachers (n = 4), and inclusive education coordinators (n = 2). Thematic analysis will be guided by Braun and Clarke’s approach to identify experiences with AI personalization, perceived barriers and enablers, and impacts on classroom climate. Triangulation will integrate quantitative and qualitative findings to elucidate the mechanisms by which AI-driven adaptation influences learning and participation. The AI system will incorporate reinforcement learning to optimize task difficulty, activity choice, and feedback modalities based on real-time sensor data and periodic performance assessments. The theoretical framework combines Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura) to explain self-regulation, motivation, and observational learning with the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles to ensure multiple means of engagement, representation, and action/expression. Anticipated findings include (i) greater improvements in motor skill competence and higher MVPA engagement in the AI-assisted group; (ii) enhanced intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, and sense of belonging among students with disabilities or lower initial skill levels; (iii) positive teacher perceptions regarding feasibility, adaptability, and time efficiency, accompanied by insights into professional development needs. The study will contribute to knowledge by providing robust evidence on how AI-enabled personalization can operationalize inclusive PE, align with UDL and equity objectives, and inform scalable implementation in diverse school contexts. Implications for practice include guidelines for selecting AI-augmented PE platforms, designing teacher training programs, and establishing data governance frameworks that protect student privacy while enabling meaningful instructional personalization. The research will also address policy considerations related to inclusive education standards, equitable access to digital resources, and the integration of sensor-based monitoring with instructional decision-making. The expected conclusion is that AI-assisted personalized PE can reduce participation gaps, elevate physical literacy across diverse learner profiles, and support sustainable inclusive practices in primary and secondary schooling. Recommendations emphasize iterative user-centered design, ongoing educator professional development, and robust evaluation protocols to monitor equity outcomes over time.
Thesis Overview
AI-assisted personalized physical education for inclusive classrooms
This research explores how artificial intelligence (AI) can tailor physical education (PE) activities to meet diverse student needs in inclusive classroom settings. It aims to create a scalable framework that uses data from students’ physical performance, engagement, and learning profiles to generate individualized lesson plans, activities, and feedback while ensuring safety and equity.
Why it matters: PE programs often struggle to accommodate a wide range of abilities within a single class. Traditional differentiation relies heavily on teacher judgment and limited resources, leading to uneven participation and achievement. An AI-driven approach promises consistent, data-informed adaptations that can boost participation, skills development, and enjoyment for students with and without disabilities, while helping teachers manage complexity and time constraints.
Research gap: While AI has been applied in sport analytics and general education, there is limited evidence on AI-enabled personalization in PE for inclusive classrooms, particularly regarding feasible data collection in real-world school contexts, teacher usability, and effects on learning outcomes, motivation, and inclusion.
What the researcher will do step by step:
1. Define a conceptual model of AI-assisted PE personalization, incorporating pedagogy, accessibility, safety, and ethics.
2. Conduct a mixed-methods study in five secondary schools, recruiting approximately 250 students across inclusive PE classes.
3. Data collection: baseline assessments of fitness, motor competence, and participation; real-time classroom data via wearable sensors and a PE management app; student and teacher surveys; and end-of-unit interviews.
4. Develop an AI module that analyzes performance, engagement, and preferences to propose differentiated activities, with teacher controls for final decisions.
5. Data analysis: use descriptive statistics and multilevel regression to examine relationships between personalization features and outcomes (participation rate, skill improvement, self-efficacy); thematic analysis of interview data; and usability testing metrics for the AI tool.
6. Validate the model through a pilot in a subsequent term and refine based on feedback.
Expected contributions: provide a validated, ethically sound framework for AI-based PE personalization in inclusive settings; generate empirical evidence on effects for engagement, skill development, and accessibility; deliver practical guidelines and a usable prototype for schools.
Anticipated outcomes: higher participation and skill gains across diverse learners, improved teacher efficiency in planning and monitoring, and positive student attitudes toward PE. Potential limitations include data privacy concerns, variability in teacher adoption, and technological access.
This study informs policy and practice by outlining how AI can support inclusive, equitable PE without compromising safety or pedagogy.