Development and Evaluation of a Peer Mentoring Program for University Counselling Students
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review of Peer Mentoring in Counselling Education
- 2.2Theoretical Framework: Social Learning Theory and Mentoring Theory
- 2.3Empirical Review: Effectiveness of Peer Mentoring Programs in Higher Education
- 2.4Empirical Review: Peer Mentoring and Counselling Students’ Academic and Psychosocial Outcomes
- 2.5Gaps in the Existing Literature on Peer Mentoring for Counselling Students
- 2.6Conceptual Model of Peer Mentoring Program Development and Evaluation
- 2.7Best Practices and Challenges in Implementing Peer Mentoring Programs
- 2.8Factors Influencing the Success of Peer Mentoring Initiatives
- 2.9The Role of University Counselling Training in Peer Mentoring Effectiveness
- 2.10Summary and Synthesis of Reviewed Literature
- 2.11Conceptual Framework for the Study
- 2.12Summary of Literature Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Development and Evaluation Approach
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm Underpinning the Study
- 3.3Population of the Study: University Counselling Students and Mentors
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified Random Sampling
- 3.5Data Sources and Instruments: Surveys, Interviews, and Program Evaluation Forms
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Data Collection Instruments
- 3.7Data Collection Procedures and Ethical Considerations
- 3.8Data Analysis Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
- 3.9Model Specification: Evaluation Metrics for Program Effectiveness
- 3.10Ethical Approval and Participant Consent Processes
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Demographic and Baseline Characteristics
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of Program Implementation
- 4.3Analysis of Pre- and Post-Intervention Outcomes
- 4.4Testing the Hypotheses: Statistical Analysis of Effectiveness
- 4.5Interpretation of Findings: Impact on Counselling Students’ Academic and Psychosocial Outcomes
- 4.6Qualitative Insights from Participant Feedback
- 4.7Discussion of Findings in Relation to Literature and Theoretical Frameworks
- 4.8Limitations and Considerations in Data Interpretation
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Key Findings
- 5.2Conclusions Derived from the Study
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge and Practice
- 5.4Practical Recommendations for Universities and Counselling Programs
- 5.5Recommendations for Future Research
- 5.6Final Remarks and Closure
Thesis Abstract
The mental health and well-being of university counselling students are increasingly recognized as critical to ensuring effective support services for the broader student population; however, many counselling students face challenges such as emotional exhaustion, professional identity development issues, and limited peer support networks, which can impede their academic performance and professional growth. This study aims to develop, implement, and evaluate a peer mentoring program tailored specifically for university counselling students to enhance their academic success, emotional resilience, and professional preparedness. The primary objectives are to design an evidence-based peer mentoring framework grounded in social learning theory and the theory of planned behavior, implement this program among counselling students, and assess its impact on mentee self-efficacy, satisfaction, and perceived competence, as well as mentor leadership skills and professional development. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study combines quantitative surveys and qualitative focus groups for comprehensive data collection. The population comprises all second- and third-year counselling students enrolled at a major metropolitan university, totaling approximately 250 students. A stratified random sampling technique is used to select 100 participants—50 mentors and 50 mentees—ensuring gender and academic year representation. Quantitative data are collected via validated questionnaires measuring variables such as self-efficacy (using the General Self-Efficacy Scale), mentoring satisfaction, and professional identity, with pre- and post-intervention assessments conducted over one academic year. Qualitative data are gathered through semi-structured focus group discussions with a subset of 20 mentees and mentors to explore experiential insights. Data validity and reliability are ensured through pilot testing, expert review, and Cronbach’s alpha analysis, with quantitative data analyzed using paired t-tests, ANCOVA, and multiple regression analysis to determine the program's effectiveness and predictors of outcomes. Thematic analysis is employed to interpret qualitative data, providing contextual understanding of participants’ experiences. Expected findings suggest that participation in the peer mentoring program will significantly improve mentees’ self-efficacy, satisfaction with their academic and professional development, and sense of belonging within the counselling community, while mentors are anticipated to demonstrate enhanced leadership capabilities and professional confidence. These outcomes are hypothesized to be mediated by increased social support and shared experiential learning, consistent with the social learning theory. The study also aims to identify key factors influencing the success of peer mentoring within the context of university counselling training. The contribution to knowledge lies in providing a rigorously developed, empirically tested peer mentoring model tailored for counselling students, filling a gap in the existing literature concerning mentorship interventions in mental health training programs. Practical implications include guidelines for implementing sustainable peer mentoring schemes within university settings to foster professional growth and emotional well-being among counselling students. In conclusion, the study will demonstrate that a structured peer mentoring program can serve as an effective intervention to support counselling students’ academic and emotional needs, thereby improving their readiness for professional practice. Recommendations will include integrating peer mentoring into counselling curricula, training programs for mentors, and establishing institutional support systems to sustain such initiatives. Suggestions for further research include longitudinal studies to examine long-term impacts on professional competency and mental health outcomes, and comparative studies across different university contexts and disciplines. Overall, this research endeavors to advance both theoretical understanding and practical applications of peer mentorship in higher education mental health training.
Thesis Overview
This research focuses on creating and testing a peer mentoring program specifically designed for university students studying counselling. Peer mentoring involves more experienced students guiding and supporting less experienced students, and in this case, it aims to enhance the academic, personal, and professional development of counselling students.
The significance of this study lies in addressing the limited formal support systems for counselling students in their practical training and emotional well-being. Many students face challenges related to stress, confidence, and professional skills, which can impact their learning experience and readiness for future roles. Despite the potential benefits, there has been little research into structured peer mentoring programs tailored for counselling students at the university level, creating a gap this study aims to fill.
The researcher will start by reviewing existing literature on peer mentoring and counseling education to understand what has worked elsewhere and identify best practices. Next, the researcher will develop a peer mentoring program based on relevant theories, such as social learning theory and transformational learning theory, which explain how mentoring influences personal and professional growth. The program will then be implemented with a sample of approximately 100 counselling students, randomly assigned to either participate in the program or serve as a control group.
Data collection will involve pre- and post-intervention surveys to measure students’ perceived support, confidence, and academic progress, along with focus group discussions to gather qualitative insights. Data analysis will include quantitative methods such as paired t-tests and ANOVA to determine the program’s effectiveness, complemented by thematic analysis of qualitative data to understand participant experiences.
The study aims to contribute to knowledge by providing evidence on how peer mentoring can support counselling students and offering a model that can be adapted by other institutions. The expected outcome is that students participating in the program will show improved academic engagement, increased confidence, and better emotional resilience. Ultimately, the study hopes to recommend scalable peer support strategies that can be integrated into counsellor education programs to prepare students more effectively for their future careers.