Assessing Subsurface CO2 Storage Integrity for UAE-Based EOR Operations
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: CO2 Storage Concepts in EOR Context
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Subsurface Integrity and Caprock Performance
- 2.3Conceptual Review: Reservoir Characterization under CO2 Flooding
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Theories of Geomechanics and Pore-Fluid Interactions
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: Risk-Based Integrity Assessment Frameworks
- 2.6Conceptual Review: CO2 Migration and Trapping Mechanisms
- 2.7Empirical Review: Global Case Studies of CO2 Storage in UAE-like Basins
- 2.8Empirical Review: EOR Operations and Long-Term Integrity Outcomes
- 2.9Empirical Review: Monitoring Technologies for CO2 Storage (Seismic, Wellbore, Cased Hole Methods)
- 2.10Empirical Review: Regulatory and Safety Standards in the UAE Context
- 2.11Identified Gaps in the Literature
- 2.12Conceptual Model or Summary of the Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Case-Study Framework for UAE-Based EOR CO2 Storage
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism or Mixed Methods Lens
- 3.3Population of the Study: Operators, Geologists, and Monitoring Data in UAE EOR Projects
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Purposive Sampling of UAE EOR Assets and Data Sets
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Well Logs, Seismic Data, Operational Records, and Monitoring Outputs
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Calibration, Triangulation, and Expert Review
- 3.7Data Analysis Methods: Geomechanical Modeling, Inverse Litho-Physics, and Statistical Tests
- 3.8Model Specification: Integrated CO2 Injection-Pressure-Integrity Model
- 3.9Ethical Considerations: Data Privacy, Proprietary Data Handling, and Environmental Impact
- 3.10Limitations of the Methodology and Mitigation Strategies
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Acquisition and Quality Control of UAE CO2 Injection Data
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Baseline Reservoir Properties and CO2 Flood Characteristics
- 4.3Descriptive Analysis: Temporal Trends in Pressure, Temperature, and Caprock Response
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Relationship between Injection Rate and Subsurface Stress Changes
- 4.5Hypotheses Testing: Sealing Integrity Indicators and Seismic Anomalies
- 4.6Interpretation of Results: Spatial Variability in Integrity Across UAE EOR Assets
- 4.7Discussion of Findings in Relation to Conceptual Frameworks
- 4.8Synthesis: Implications for Storage Integrity and Long-Term Containment
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Advancing Subsurface CO2 Storage Integrity in UAE EOR Context
- 5.4Practical Recommendations for Operators and Regulators
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
The rapid expansion of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in the United Arab Emirates relies on subsurface CO2 injection to sustain reservoir pressure while complicating long-term integrity assessments due to complex geology, variable sealing capacity, and potential leakage pathways. This study addresses the critical problem of ensuring CO2 storage integrity in UAE EOR operations, focusing on pre-and post-injection monitoring, risk identification, and mitigation within carbonate and clastic reservoir–cap rock systems. The aim is to develop a robust, field-scale framework for assessing storage integrity that integrates geological, geophysical, geochemical, and operational indicators to support safe, compliant, and economically viable CO2-EOR deployment. Specific objectives are (i) to characterize reservoir and cap rock properties relevant to CO2 containment across selected UAE fields; (ii) to evaluate seal integrity and potential leakage pathways using integrated petrophysical, sequence stratigraphic, and structural analyses; (iii) to quantify storage risk through probabilistic pore-scale and reservoir-scale modeling, including CO2 plume migration and estimate of maximum allowable leakage rates; (iv) to validate monitoring strategies using time-lapse seismic, borehole pressure monitoring, and geochemical tracers; and (v) to develop a decision-support framework linking monitoring data to operational actions and regulatory compliance. The methodology adopts a concurrent mixed-methods approach. The population comprises five UAE oil fields with established CO2-EOR programs and one pilot sequestration site, with a target sample of 50-70 wells and surrounding geologic units. Data collection employs (a) well logs (LWD/MWD, porosity, permeability, capillary pressure), core samples (n?120 cores) for cap rock and reservoir characterization, (b) time-lapse 3D seismic datasets (pre- and post-injection) spanning at least four years, (c) in-situ reservoir pressure and temperature records from monitoring wells (minimum 4 years of history), and (d) geochemical tracers and produced fluid samples for phase behavior and mineralogical analyses. Instruments include nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) porosity measurements, mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), X-ray diffraction (XRD) for mineralogy, and natural gamma and resistivity tools. The study uses a probabilistic risk assessment framework combined with physics-based reservoir simulation. Data analysis integrates (i) multivariate statistical methods and regression analyses to correlate lithofacies, fracture density, and seal properties with observed CO2 breakthrough indicators; (ii) Bayesian updating to refine leakage probability distributions as new data emerge; (iii) reservoir-scale CO2 flow modeling with TOUGHREACT/CMS-COUPLE to simulate plume migration, cap-rock integrity, and mineral trapping; (iv) time-lapse seismic attribute analysis and closed-loop inversion to monitor plume extent; (v) geochemical modeling to evaluate mineral-fluid reactions affecting seal stability; and (vi) thematic analysis of operator practices to identify procedural risk drivers, framed by the efficiency-equity theory to assess stakeholder compliance impacts. The theoretical backbone combines the containment theory of CO2 storage with the risk governance framework and barrier analysis (probabilistic barriers, dynamic containment, and early-warning signals). Expected findings include (i) quantified correlations between cap-rock properties and seal performance, (ii) probabilistic estimates of leakage risk under varying injection rates and reservoir pressures, (iii) validated monitoring protocols with sensitivity analyses identifying the most informative indicators (time-lapse seismic amplitudes, reservoir pressure transients, and tracer breakthrough timing), and (iv) a decision-support dashboard linking observed indicators to recommended operational actions. The study contributes to knowledge by integrating field-scale UAE CO2-EOR data into a holistic storage integrity framework, advancing methodology for predicting seal breach likelihood, and providing a validated workflow for monitoring program design tailored to Middle East geology. Practical implications include improved risk-informed operational decisions, enhanced regulatory reporting, and a scalable approach for transitioning CO2-EOR to safe storage. The main conclusion anticipates that a combined monitoring-software workflow, anchored in Bayesian updating and physics-based simulation, can reliably constrain leakage probabilities within regulatory thresholds under typical UAE reservoir conditions. Recommendations emphasize ongoing data integration, refinement of cap-rock characterization protocols, and adoption of standardized reporting formats for CO2 storage integrity in UAE EOR operations.
Thesis Overview
This thesis investigates how safely CO2 injected for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in the United Arab Emirates remains contained in the subsurface over time. The central concern is that CO2 storage used to boost oil production must not leak through rocks or faults, which could threaten groundwater, climate goals, and project viability. The study addresses a gap in region-specific understanding of storage integrity given the UAE’s geology, high-temperature conditions, and industry practices.
Why it matters: CO2-EOR is a practical way to increase oil recovery while potentially offering a long-term storage option for CO2. However, effective validation of storage integrity in the UAE context requires integration of geophysical monitoring, reservoir characterization, and risk assessment to ensure containment and public and environmental safety.
What problem or gap it tackles: There is a need for a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment framework that links subsurface geology, CO2 plume behavior, seal integrity, and monitoring data under UAE operational conditions. Prior studies often focus on generic cases or different tectonic settings; this work tailors methods to UAE basins and oilfield configurations.
What the researcher will do step by step:
- Define the study area within one UAE oilfield that uses CO2-EOR and compile geological, geophysical, and operational data.
- Characterize reservoir properties and cap-rock seals using core samples, well logs, and seismic data.
- Develop a monitoring plan leveraging time-lapse seismic (4D seismic), pressure and saturation surveys, and tracer tests to track CO2 movement.
- Collect data from operators on injection volumes, pressures, and temperature histories; supplement with public datasets where available.
- Analyze data with numerical reservoir simulations (multiphase flow models) and statistical methods (regression analysis) to estimate CO2 plume migration and seal performance.
- Assess risk using a probabilistic framework and identify thresholds for leakage and caprock integrity.
- Synthesize findings into an integrated assessment of storage integrity and provide management recommendations.
Expected contribution and outcomes: The study will deliver a UAE-specific, methodological framework for evaluating CO2 storage integrity in EOR operations, enhance understanding of key parameters controlling leakage risk, and offer practical guidelines for monitoring, reporting, and decision-making.
Innovation and recommendations: The research will recommend standardized monitoring protocols, data-sharing practices with operators, and policy implications for safe CO2-EOR deployment in the region.