Quantitative Geochemical Provenance of Sandstones in Coastal Basins: Field Study
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.
- 1.1Introduction
- 2.
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 3.
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 4.
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 5.
- 1.5Research Questions
- 6.
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 7.
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 8.
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 9.
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 10.
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 11.
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 1.
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Geochemical Provenance Concepts for Sandstones
- 2.
- 2.2Geochemical Fingerprinting Techniques in Provenance Analysis
- 3.
- 2.3Sediment Source-to-Sink Systems in Coastal Basins
- 4.
- 2.4Isotope Geochemistry in Sandstone Provenance (Sr, Nd, Pb systems)
- 5.
- 2.5Major and Trace Element Ratios in Sandstones for Provenance (SiO2-Al2O3-TiO2, K2O/Na2O, Th/U, REE patterns)
- 6.
- 2.6Detrital Zircon U-Pb Provenance Approaches
- 7.
- 2.7Depositional Environment and Post-Depositional Diagenesis Effects on Geochemistry
- 8.
- 2.8Tectonic Setting Influence on Sedimentary Provenance
- 9.
- 2.9Weathering and Erosion Controls on Sandstone Compositions
- 10.
- 2.10Spatial-Temporal Variability in Coastal Basins
- 11.
- 2.11Analytical Methods and QA/QC for Geochemical Data
- 12.
- 2.12Conceptual Model: Integrating Geochemistry with Basin-Scale Provenance
- 13.
- 2.13Gaps in the Literature and Research Gaps for Coastal Sandstone Provenance
- 14.
- 2.14Conceptual Model / Summary of Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 1.
- 3.1Research Design: Field-Based Geochemical Provenance Study
- 2.
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in Integrating Qualitative Field Context with Quantitative Geochemistry
- 3.
- 3.3Population of the Study: Sandstone Formations in Selected Coastal Basins
- 4.
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified Random Sampling Across Lithologies and Sections
- 5.
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Field Sampling Protocols, Handheld XRF, Lab ICP-MS/ICP-AES, Zircon Abundance Methods
- 6.
- 3.6Sample Preparation and Laboratory Workflows
- 7.
- 3.7Geochemical Analyses: Major, Trace Elements, REE, and Isotopes
- 8.
- 3.8Mineralogical and Petrographic Analyses: Modal Composition and Detrital Grains
- 9.
- 3.9Validity and Reliability of Instruments: QA/QC Procedures, Standards, Blanks, Replicates
- 10.
- 3.10Method of Data Analysis: Multivariate Statistics, Isotope Mixing Models, Discordia Tests
- 11.
- 3.11Model Specification or Analytical Framework: Provenance Tracing Framework and Computational Tools
- 12.
- 3.12Spatial Data Integration and GIS Techniques
- 13.
- 3.13Ethical Considerations in Field Sampling and Data Handling
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 1.
- 4.1Data Presentation: Field Logbooks, Sample Catalog, and Preliminary Descriptive Tables
- 2.
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of Major Element Geochemistry
- 3.
- 4.3Trace Element and REE Patterns Across Coastal Sections
- 4.
- 4.4Isotopic Ratios and Provenance Signals (Sr-Nd-Pb) in Sandstones
- 5.
- 4.5Zircon U-Pb Provenance Insights and Detrital Age Distributions
- 6.
- 4.6Multivariate Statistical Results: PCA/FA for Source-Ato-Sink Relationships
- 7.
- 4.7Geochemical Mapping and Spatial Trends in Coastal Basins
- 8.
- 4.8Hypotheses Testing: Provenance Consistence with Tectonic and Basin-Scale Models
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 1.
- 5.1Summary of Findings Related to Sandstone Provenance in Coastal Basins
- 2.
- 5.2Conclusions on Geochemical Provenance Controls
- 3.
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge: Methodological and Geological Implications
- 4.
- 5.4Practical Implications for Coastal Basin Resource Assessment
- 5.
- 5.5Recommendations for Field and Laboratory Protocols
- 6.
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies and Future Research Directions
Thesis Abstract
Quantitative geochemical provenance analysis of sandstones within coastal basins addresses the critical question of sediment source-to-sink pathways under dynamic sea-level and tectonic forcings. The study targets improving resolution of provenanced end-member contributions and sediment redistributions that shape reservoir quality in shallow to marginal marine settings. The aim is to quantify multiple provenance signals and establish robust mixing models that link sandstone compositions to hinterland sources while accounting for diagenetic overprints and tectonic setting. Specific objectives are (i) to characterize mineralogical and major- and trace-element composition of sandstone samples (n = 210) across three coastal basins using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry and X-ray diffraction (XRD); (ii) to determine detrital zircon U-Pb ages (n = 120 grains) and Hf isotopic compositions to constrain source terrane contributions; (iii) to apply quantitative provenance techniques including end-member normalization, principal component analysis (PCA), mixing models, and multivariate regression to apportion source contributions; (iv) to evaluate the influence of weathering intensity, sedimentary transport distance, and tectonic uplift on element geochemistry through regression and analysis of variance (ANOVA); and (v) to develop a basin-scale provenance framework applicable to similar coastal systems. The methodology adopts a field-based, cross-section sampling strategy across three coastal basins, with stratigraphic control and documented lithofacies. The population comprises siliciclastic sandstones of late Cretaceous to Miocene age. A stratified random sampling approach yields representative samples from 35 outcrops, with duplicate samples for quality assurance, resulting in a dataset of 420 sandstone samples for XRF/XRD and 210 for microprobe-based minor elements. Detrital zircon grains are extracted from 12 representative sandstones, yielding 120 grains for U-Pb dating and Hf isotopes. Data collection combines laboratory-based geochemical analyses and in situ geochronology. XRF determines major and trace element concentrations; XRD identifies modal mineralogy and clay transitions; laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) provides trace element fingerprinting; LA-ICP-MS zircon analysis yields U-Pb ages and Hf isotopic ratios. Provenance modeling integrates end-member mixing, PCA, and discriminant function analysis, followed by regression-based evaluation of environmental and tectonic correlates. The study employs the theoretical framework of detrital geochronology and crustal evolution theory, with relevant terrestrial end-member concepts such as Apachean-type and nappe-related sources, and the cosmopolitan principle of incremental sediment addition through riverine and coastal processes. Validity and reliability are ensured through standardized sample preparation, duplicate analyses, cross-laboratory calibration, and blind duplicates. Data analysis uses descriptive statistics for compositional ranges, PCA for dimensionality reduction, and hierarchical clustering to identify source affinities. End-member mixing models estimate relative contributions from paleoisland, continental shield, and orogenic belt sources, validated against the U-Pb age spectra and Hf isotopic signatures. Regression analyses test hypotheses linking provenance indicators with basin tectonics, climate-driven sediment supply, and shoreline progradation rates; ANOVA assesses differences among basins and facies. Ethical considerations include transparent handling of samples, data provenance, and adherence to field collection permits. Key expected findings include (i) a dominant mix of hinterland sources with varying contributions across basins, (ii) coherent detrital zircon age spectra that reflect multiple tectonic blocks, (iii) robust correlations between major/trace element ratios (e.g., Th/Sc, La/Sc, Cr/Th) and source terrain lithologies, and (iv) discernible impacts of tectonic uplift and climate on sediment routing and diagenetic overprinting. The study contributes to knowledge by refining quantitative provenance methodologies for coastal sandstone systems, integrating detrital zircon geochronology with conventional geochemical fingerprints to improve source-to-sink inferences, and providing a transferable framework for petroleum and hydrogeological applications in similar coastal basins. The main conclusion anticipates that coastal basins record complex, multi-source contributions with differential preservation of geochemical signals due to diagenesis and transport, necessitating a multi-proxy approach for reliable provenance. Recommendations include adopting integrated multi-proxy provenance workflows in regional exploration models, expanding sample coverage to nearshore deposits to capture littoral reworking, and applying the framework to assess reservoir compartmentalization and sedimentary filtration processes in hydrocarbon systems.
Thesis Overview
This research investigates where the sand in coastal basin sandstones comes from by using quantitative geochemical measurements to trace the source rocks that contributed sediment. Understanding provenance helps reconstruct past landscapes, tectonic settings, and sediment transport paths, which are important for basin analysis, resource exploration, and predicting sedimentation in coastal environments.
Why it matters: Coastal basins host economically important sandstones used for construction materials and potential hydrocarbon reservoirs. Clarifying provenance improves interpretations of basin evolution, helps assess mineralogical and geochemical controls on sandstone quality, and reduces uncertainties in stratigraphic correlations and reservoir models.
What problem it addresses: Previous studies often rely on qualitative or single-proxy approaches, which can misidentify source regions in complex coastal systems where multiple provenances mix. This study adopts a quantitative, multi-proxy framework to provide robust, statistically testable source allocations.
Research plan in steps:
- Study area and sampling: Select a coastal basin with mixed sediment input; collect 50 sandstone samples across stratigraphic sections and different sub-basins to capture lateral variability.
- Field data: Record stratigraphic position, grain size, weathering indicators, and relative tectonic hints to contextualize geochemical signals.
- Laboratory analyses: Perform major and trace element geochemistry using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS); analyze mineralogy with X-ray diffraction (XRD); obtain zircon U-Pb ages and hafnium isotopes from detrital zircon for refined source age constraints.
- Data processing: Normalize geochemical data, calculate discrimination diagrams, and apply multivariate statistics (principal component analysis, cluster analysis) to identify dominant provenances.
- Provenance modeling: Use statistical mixing models and Regression/ANOVA to quantify contributions from competing source areas; test hypotheses about transport pathways and weathering intensities.
- Synthesis: Integrate geochemical results with stratigraphic and sedimentological context to reconstruct sediment-routing systems.
Expected contribution: A rigorous, quantitative provenance framework for coastal sandstones that improves source discrimination, enhances interpretation of basin evolution, and provides a reproducible methodology adaptable to other coastal or mixed-sediment systems.
Expected outcome: Clear identification and quantification of primary and secondary source contributions, with explicit confidence levels, and a set of guidelines for applying multi-proxy provenance approaches to similar settings.