Quantitative Assessment of Sedimentary Provenance in Coastal Basins
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Sedimentary Provenance in Coastal Basins
- 2.2Theoretical Framework: Detrital Zircon Provenance Theory
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Sedimentary Dispersion and Tectonic Abrasion Theory
- 2.4Empirical Review: Provenance Techniques in Coastal Basins
- 2.5Empirical Review: Mineralogical and Geochemical Provenance Indicators
- 2.6Empirical Review: Stratigraphic Provenance Correlation in Marine Environments
- 2.7Empirical Review: Sediment Transport Pathways and Basin Fill History
- 2.8Empirical Review: Climate and Weathering Influence on Provenance Signals
- 2.9Empirical Review: Dating and Provenance Cross-Validation Methods
- 2.10Empirical Review: Multidisciplinary Provenance Integrations (Isotope, Grain-Size, Petrography)
- 2.11Gaps in the Literature: Unresolved Provenance Signals in Coastal Settings
- 2.12Conceptual Model: Integrative Provenance Framework for Coastal Basins
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Multimethod Field-Based Provenance Study
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in Geoscience Inquiry
- 3.3Population of the Study: Coastal Basin Sedimentary Sections and Outcrops
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified Random Sampling of Core and Outcrop Samples
- 3.5Data Sources and Instruments: Petrographic Thin Sections, LA-ICP-MS, U-Pb Zircon Dating, XRD, Grain-Size Analysis, Sedimentological Logs
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Calibration Protocols and Inter-Laboratory Comparisons
- 3.7Data Handling and Quality Control: Chain-of-Custody and Metadata Standards
- 3.8Field Procedures: In-Situ Sediment Collection and Stratigraphic Logging
- 3.9Laboratory Procedures: Mineralogical and Geochemical Analyses
- 3.10Data Analysis Methods: Detrital Zircon Provenance Indices, Principal Component Analysis, Multivariate Statistics
- 3.11Model Specification: Integrative Provenance Model for Coastal Basins
- 3.12Ethical Considerations: Field Permits, Indigenous Knowledge, and Data Sharing
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
- 4.1Data Presentation: Spatial Distribution of Provenance Signals
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Grain-Size, Sorting, and Mineralogy Profiles
- 4.3Descriptive Statistics of Zircon Populations
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Correlation Between Provenance Indices and Detrital Age Spectra
- 4.5Hypotheses Testing: Association Between Sediment Transport Pathways and Basin Architecture
- 4.6Interpretive Analysis: Source-to-Sink Relationships in the Coastal Basin
- 4.7Discussion: Provenance Signals in the Context of Regional Tectonics
- 4.8Discussion: Implications for Basin Evolution and Reservoir Quality
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications for Coastal Basin Exploration
- 5.5Recommendations for Coastal Basin Provenance Assessments
- 5.6Suggestions for Future Studies
Thesis Abstract
Coastal basins exhibit complex sedimentary records that reflect multi- sourced provenance, stratigraphic mixing, and dynamic sediment transport processes, yet quantitative attribution of sediment sources remains challenging due to diagenetic alteration, geochemical overlaps, and limited integration of multi-proxy data. This study aims to deliver a robust, quantitative assessment of sedimentary provenance in selected coastal basins to improve paleogeographic reconstructions and reservoir-quality predictions. The specific objectives are to (i) characterize mineralogical and geochemical signatures of sediments from suspected source regions, (ii) quantify relative source contributions using multivariate statistical and isotopic approaches, (iii) assess spatial and temporal variations in provenance through stratigraphic horizons and subsurface cores, and (iv) evaluate the sensitivity of provenance signals to diagenetic overprint and sedimentary sorting. The research adopts a mixed-methods design anchored in empirical field observations and laboratory analyses, integrating sedimentologic, mineralogical, geochemical, and isotopic datasets. The population comprises sediment samples from three coastal basins with quasi-continuous stratigraphic records spanning late Miocene to Holocene. A stratified random sampling scheme yields 120 surface samples and 60 borehole core intervals, ensuring representation of proximal and distal sources, channel belts, deltaic lobes, and shelf sediments. Data collection employs X-ray diffraction (XRD) for mineralogy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for major and trace element concentrations, laser ablation ICP-MS for in-situ trace element zoning, and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic analyses to resolve crustal source lithologies. Elemental ratios (e.g., Zr/Ti, Th/Sc, La/Yb) and isotopic fingerprints are compiled with existing regional rock suites to construct a probabilistic provenance model. Validity and reliability are addressed through triplicate analyses, standard reference materials, and cross-validation with a curated regional geochemical library. Data analysis proceeds in three layers (i) exploratory multivariate techniques (principal component analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis) to identify distinct source assemblages; (ii) quantitative source apportionment using end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) and probabilistic isotopic mixing models; and (iii) temporal Bayesian updating to track provenance shifts through stratigraphic time steps. The study tests hypotheses that coastal basin sediments derive a dominant crustal component with measurable contributions from distant orogens, while also detecting secondary inputs from river basins with dendritic drainage patterns. Theoretical framing draws on processes-based provenance theory and tectono-kinematic basin analysis, with explicit use of the framework of end-member mixing models and isotopic discrimination as the core analytical lens. Expected findings include (a) distinct geochemical clusters corresponding to proximal nearshore vs. distal hinterland sources, (b) statistically significant contributions from particular lithologies (e.g., arc-derived granitoids vs. cratonic rocks) revealed by Sr-Nd-Pb isotope signatures, and (c) temporal shifts in provenance linked to known sea-level fluctuations and river avulsion events. The integration of mineralogical and isotopic data is anticipated to reduce non-uniqueness in source attribution and improve confidence intervals for source proportions. The study contributes to knowledge by providing a replicable, multi-proxy provenance framework tailored to coastal basins, enabling refined paleogeographic reconstructions, improved understanding of sediment routing, and better predictive power for reservoir characterization in siliciclastic systems. The conclusion emphasizes that combining EMMA with isotope-based discrimination yields more robust source apportionment than either approach alone, and that diagenetic considerations must be explicitly modeled to avoid overinterpretation of signal. Recommendations include extending the approach to additional coastal basins with varying tectonic settings, incorporating detrital zircon U-Pb dating to enhance source resolution, and applying the framework to hydrocarbon exploration models to improve stratigraphic correlation and reservoir quality assessment.
Thesis Overview
This research investigates where the sand and mud in coastal basins come from and how they travel to and settle in those basins. Understanding sediment provenance helps reconstruct past environments, predict how coastlines respond to storms or sea-level rise, and inform basin-scale resource and hazard assessments. The study addresses a gap in integrated, quantitative provenance analysis that combines mineralogical, geochemical, and stratigraphic data to produce a consistent source-to-sink picture for coastal systems.
What the research is about in practical terms
- Identify potential source areas for coastal basin sediments, such as nearby river basins, regional eroding uplands, or offshore sources.
- Determine how different source rocks and weathering processes contribute to the sediment mix observed in coastal deposits.
- Link sediment characteristics to transport pathways and depositional mechanisms, including riverine input, coastal currents, and wave processes.
- Produce a reproducible, quantitative framework that can be applied to other coastal basins worldwide.
Why it matters
- It improves reconstruction of past climatic and tectonic conditions by clarifying where sediments originated.
- It supports coastal management by predicting how changes in land use or climate might alter sediment supply and shoreline evolution.
- It enhances exploration and sedimentary basin modeling by providing robust provenance constraints.
What the researcher will do, step by step
- Define study sites in a representative coastal basin and compile a sampling plan across river mouths, estuaries, and nearshore sediments.
- Collect sediment samples (n ? 60–100) and, where possible, outcrop rocks from potential source areas.
- Analyze samples using a combination of methods: petrographic modal analysis, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) geochemistry, rare earth element (REE) patterns, and detrital zircon U-Pb dating to establish mineralogical and geochemical fingerprints.
- Apply multivariate statistics (principal component analysis, k-means clustering) to group sediments by provenance signals and quantify source contributions.
- Integrate stratigraphic context with transport models to link provenance signatures to depositional processes.
- Validate results with sensitivity tests and compare against existing regional tectonic and climatic records.
Expected contribution and outcome
- A transparent, quantitative provenance model for the coastal basin that can be generalized to similar settings.
- A set of robust tracers and a statistical workflow that others can reuse.
- Improved understanding of how sediment supply responds to environmental change, with practical implications for coastal resilience and resource assessment.