Conception, implémentation et évaluation d’un système de recommandation énergétique
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction to Energy Consumption and Personalised Recommendations
- 1.2Background of the Energy Efficiency Context and Digital Advisory Systems
- 1.3Statement of the Problem in Home Energy Management and User Engagement
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study in Designing a Recommender System
- 1.5Research Questions Driving the System’s Design and Evaluation
- 1.6Research Hypotheses on System Performance and User Adoption
- 1.7Significance of the Study for Households, Utilities, and Policy
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Energy Recommender System
- 1.9Limitations of the Study in Real-World Deployment
- 1.10Organisation of the Study Across Chapters
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms Used in the Recommender Context
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Personalised Energy Recommenders and Behavior Change
- 2.2Conceptualization of Energy Efficiency and User-Centric Design Principles
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Self-Determination Theory
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Contextual Fit
- 2.5Empirical Review: Recommender Systems in Energy Management
- 2.6Empirical Review: Data Sources for Home Energy Advisories
- 2.7Empirical Review: User Interface Design for Energy Feedback
- 2.8Empirical Review: Privacy, Trust and Data Governance in Energy Advice
- 2.9Empirical Review: Evaluation Metrics for Recommender Effectiveness
- 2.10Empirical Review: Behavioral Change Outcomes from Energy Feedback
- 2.11Identified Gaps in the Literature on Energy Recommenders
- 2.12Conceptual Model or Summary of the Review: Linking Data, Algorithms and User Outcomes
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Design-Science Approach for a Recommender System
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in Design and Evaluation
- 3.3Population of the Study: Domestic Users, Home Energy Devices and Utilities Partners
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified and Convenience Sampling
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Sensor Data, User Surveys, Interviews
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Pre-Tests and Triangulation
- 3.7Data Preprocessing and Feature Engineering Methods
- 3.8Recommender Algorithm Selection and System Architecture
- 3.9Model Specification or Analytical Framework: Evaluation Metrics and Hypothesis Testing
- 3.10Ethical Considerations: Consent, Privacy, and Data Protection
- 3.11Implementation Protocol: System Development Lifecycle and Prototyping
- 3.12Pilot Testing and Iterative Refinement
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: System Usage and Interaction Logs
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: User Demographics and Baseline Energy Profiles
- 4.3Descriptive Analysis: Recommender Interaction Patterns
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Recommendation Relevance and Energy Savings
- 4.5Hypotheses Testing: User Acceptance and Engagement Levels
- 4.6Interpretation of Results: Algorithm Performance and Computational Efficiency
- 4.7Interpretation of Results: Behavioral Change Indicators across User Segments
- 4.8Discussion of Findings in Relation to Reviewed Literature
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Key Findings and System Capabilities
- 5.2Conclusion on the Feasibility and Impact of the Energy Recommender
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Methodological and Practical Advances
- 5.4Recommendations for System Enhancement and Deployment
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies and Long-Term Evaluation
Thesis Abstract
This study addresses the escalating energy consumption in multi-tenant buildings and the consequent need for personalized, actionable guidance to reduce carbon footprints without compromising occupant comfort. The problem centers on the low adoption rates of energy-saving practices due to suboptimal personalization and real-time feedback. The objective is to design, implement, and evaluate an intelligent energy-recommendation system that delivers adaptive, user-specific guidance for energy optimization in commercial buildings. Specific objectives include (1) to develop a data-driven recommendation engine that integrates building energy meters, occupant behavior signals, and weather data; (2) to implement a modular architecture enabling plug-and-play integration with existing Building Management Systems (BMS) and consumer devices; (3) to evaluate the system’s effectiveness in reducing energy intensity and peak demand; (4) to assess user acceptance and perceived usefulness to identify barriers and facilitators of adoption. The methodological approach combines design science research with empirical evaluation. The research adopts a mixed-methods design in three phases. Phase 1 involves a design and prototyping phase in which an energy-recommendation prototype is developed using a modular microservices architecture and deployed within a 12-floor commercial building pilot. Phase 2 entails a quasi-experimental field study over six months with two comparable buildings assigned as intervention (n=150 occupants) and control (n=150 occupants). Phase 3 comprises a follow-up qualitative evaluation to explore user experience and behavioral adaptation, using purposive sampling to conduct 20 in-depth interviews and 6 focus groups with occupants, facility managers, and system administrators. Data sources include smart meter data with hourly granularity, building occupancy logs, weather data from the local meteorological station, BMS events, and user interaction traces from the recommendation interface. Instruments include calibrated energy consumption dashboards, a validated user acceptance survey (Technology Acceptance Model adapted for energy guidance), semi-structured interview protocols, and a system log audit trail. Validity and reliability are ensured through triangulation, pretesting of instruments, pilot testing of the prototype, and inter-rater reliability checks for qualitative coding. Data analysis utilizes a combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques regression analyses (fixed-effects, panel data) to quantify energy savings attributable to the recommendations, time-series decomposition to identify trends and seasonality, and ANOVA to compare intervention and control groups. The recommender employs collaborative filtering augmented with content-based rules and a reinforcement-learning module to adjust recommendations based on user feedback and energy impact. The theoretical underpinning draws on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to frame user adoption and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to elucidate behavioral intentions, complemented by the Information-Cowerdedness-Action framework to assess how information disclosure affects decision-making. A conceptual model links system inputs (metered energy, occupancy, weather), processing (prediction, optimization, advisories), outputs (personalized recommendations), and outcomes (energy savings, occupant satisfaction). Expected findings include statistically significant reductions in site-wide energy intensity (target ?12% annualized reduction) and peak demand (target ?8% during peak hours) in the intervention building relative to the control. It is anticipated that personalized, context-aware recommendations will yield higher perceived usefulness (mean TAM score ?4.0 on a 5-point scale) and greater behavioral intention to adopt energy-saving actions (TPB constructs showing positive shifts with p<0.05). Qualitative results are expected to reveal enablers such as clear feedback, trust in data provenance, perceived autonomy, and seamless integration with existing workflows, alongside barriers including notification fatigue and data privacy concerns. The study contributes to knowledge by operationalizing a scalable energy-recommendation architecture that blends machine learning with human-centered design, enriching the evidence base on real-time, personalized energy guidance in commercial settings. It advances understanding of how behavioral and technological factors interact to drive energy-saving practices and provides a tested blueprint for integrating recommender systems within BMS ecosystems. Policy and practice implications include recommendations for standardizing data interfaces, ensuring occupant privacy, and aligning incentive structures with energy-saving outcomes. Concluding, the research is expected to demonstrate that a modular, user-centric energy-recommendation system can achieve meaningful energy savings while maintaining occupant comfort and acceptance. Recommendations emphasize extending the prototype to different building typologies, exploring long-term behavioral adaptation, enhancing explainability of recommendations, and refining the governance framework for data management and system updates.
Thesis Overview
This research explores how to design, build, and evaluate a personalized energy-recommendation system that helps households or buildings reduce energy consumption while maintaining comfort. It matters because energy waste in buildings contributes significantly to costs and environmental impact, and smart recommendations can steer user behavior and appliance use toward more efficient patterns.
What problem or knowledge gap it addresses: While many energy-monitoring tools exist, there is a lack of robust, user-centered recommender systems that tailor energy-saving suggestions to individual routines, preferences, and local weather conditions. Prior work often lacks rigorous evaluation in real-world settings or fails to integrate heterogeneous data sources (consumption data, occupancy signals, appliance-level information, and user feedback). The study aims to bridge this gap by delivering a system that combines data-driven models with human-centered evaluation.
Step-by-step plan:
- Phase 1: Requirements and scope. Define target users (e.g., apartment dwellers, small offices) and collect initial usage data and comfort constraints.
- Phase 2: Data collection. Gather multi-source data over three months: smart meter half-hourly energy data, occupancy indicators, weather data, appliance metadata, and user interaction logs. Recruit a sample of 120 households or offices, with 60 in a control group and 60 in an intervention group.
- Phase 3: Model development. Develop a hybrid recommendation engine that blends collaborative filtering for personalized patterns with content-based rules reflecting building physics and occupancy. Employ regression analysis and time-series forecasting to predict energy-saving opportunities, and use reinforcement learning to optimize the sequencing of recommendations.
- Phase 4: Implementation. Deploy the system in a pilot environment, delivering daily energy-saving tips and actionable automation suggestions through a user interface.
- Phase 5: Evaluation. Use a mixed-methods approach: quantitative analysis with paired t-tests and ANOVA to compare energy use between groups; regression to identify drivers of savings; and qualitative surveys or interviews to assess user acceptance and perceived usefulness.
- Phase 6: Validation and refinement. Based on results, refine models and guidance rules, and assess scalability and robustness.
Expected contributions: a validated, real-world energy-recommendation framework that integrates heterogeneous data, demonstrates measurable energy reductions, and provides design guidelines for user-centric, deployable energy recommender systems.
Anticipated outcomes: improved energy efficiency in the intervention group, higher user engagement with tailored recommendations, and a transferable blueprint for similar applications in diverse building types.