A Unified Framework for Fault-Tolerant Power Electronics Modeling
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.
- 1.1Introduction to a Unified Framework for Fault-Tolerant Power Electronics Modeling
- 2.
- 1.2Background of the Study on Fault-Tolerant Power Electronics
- 3.
- 1.3Statement of the Problem in Fault-Tolerant Modeling
- 4.
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study for a Unified Framework
- 5.
- 1.5Research Questions Guiding Fault-Tolerant Modeling
- 6.
- 1.6Research Hypotheses on Model Robustness and Tolerance
- 7.
- 1.7Significance of the Study for Power Electronics Reliability
- 8.
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Framework
- 9.
- 1.9Limitations of the Study and Mitigation Strategies
- 10.
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 11.
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms in Fault-Tolerant Modeling
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 12.
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Fault Tolerance in Power Electronics
- 13.
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Digital Twin and Model-Based Design for Fault Tolerance
- 14.
- 2.3Conceptual Review: Redundancy Schemes in Power Converters
- 15.
- 2.4Conceptual Review: Health Monitoring Techniques for Power Electronics
- 16.
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: System Reliability and Degradation Theory
- 17.
- 2.6Theoretical Framework: Robust Control Theory in Fault Scenarios
- 18.
- 2.7Theoretical Framework: Uncertainty Quantification in Electrical Systems
- 19.
- 2.8Empirical Review: Fault-Tolerant Converter Architectures in Practice
- 20.
- 2.9Empirical Review: Sensor Fault Detection and Isolation Methods
- 21.
- 2.10Empirical Review: Recovery and Reconfiguration Strategies
- 22.
- 2.11Identified Gaps in the Literature on Fault-Tolerant Modeling
- 23.
- 2.12Conceptual Model or Summary of the Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 24.
- 3.1Research Design: Model-Driven Framework Development
- 25.
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Constructivist-Realist Stance for Modeling
- 26.
- 3.3Population of the Study: Power Electronics Systems and Components
- 27.
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique for Framework Validation
- 28.
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Simulation, Bench-Test, and Field Data
- 29.
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments in Modeling Context
- 30.
- 3.7Method of Data Analysis: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Hybrid Approaches
- 31.
- 3.8Model Specification: Unified Fault-Tolerant Modeling Equations
- 32.
- 3.9Analytical Framework: Fault Injection and Recovery Scenarios
- 33.
- 3.10Ethical Considerations in Experimental Validation
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
- 34.
- 4.1Data Presentation: Simulation Outputs of the Fault-Tolerant Framework
- 35.
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis of Model Parameters and Health Indicators
- 36.
- 4.3Hypotheses Testing: Robustness Under Fault Scenarios
- 37.
- 4.4Interpretation of Results: Model Accuracy and Reliability Metrics
- 38.
- 4.5Discussion of Findings in Relation to Conceptual Review
- 39.
- 4.6Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Evaluation
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 40.
- 5.1Summary of Findings Relevant to a Unified Framework
- 41.
- 5.2Conclusion on the Efficacy of Fault-Tolerant Modeling
- 42.
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge in Power Electronics Modeling
- 43.
- 5.4Recommendations for Framework Adoption and Improvement
- 44.
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies and Extensions
Thesis Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of power electronics, fault tolerance remains a critical bottleneck for ensuring reliability, safety, and continuous operation across renewable energy interfaces, electric vehicles, and industrial drives. This study addresses the persistent gap between fault-tolerant control strategies and comprehensive modeling that unifies device, circuit, and system-level dynamics under diverse fault scenarios. The aim is to develop a unified modeling framework that integrates physics-based device models, topology-aware circuit representations, and probabilistic fault behavior to enable provable resilience metrics for power electronics systems. The specific objectives are (1) to formulate a multi-scale, physics-informed model that couples semiconductor device degradation mechanisms with switching-level behavior; (2) to construct a topology-aware fault taxonomy and incorporate it into a unified state-space representation; (3) to develop a probabilistic reliability layer employing Markovian and Bayesian approaches to quantify fault propagation and recovery under operational stress; (4) to validate the framework against benchmark converters (DC-DC, inverters, and motor drives) experiencing intentional faults including short-circuits, open-circuits, parameter drifts, and thermal runaway; and (5) to derive resilience metrics and design guidelines for fault-tolerant operation, control reconfiguration, and diagnostic decision support. The methodology adopts a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design rooted in systems theory and reliability engineering. The research will employ a mixed population comprising 60 commercial and 20 wide-bandgap-oriented silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) power devices tested under accelerated aging conditions. Data collection will involve (i) high-fidelity circuit simulations using SPICE with parasitic models and physics-based device models, (ii) laboratory experiments on three representative converter topologies using a programmable load bank and thermal chamber to induce controlled faults, and (iii) field data from industrial drives to capture real-world fault patterns. Instrumentation includes high-speed data acquisition (?1 MHz sampling) for voltage, current, temperature, and switching signals; device failure logs; and diagnostic outputs from built-in self-test modules. Validity and reliability will be established through cross-validation of simulation results with hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) experiments and adherence to traceable calibration standards. Data analysis will combine quantitative and qualitative techniques (i) regression analysis and time-series forecasting to quantify fault impact on performance margins, (ii) stochastic modeling using Markov chains and Bayesian networks to capture fault progression and recovery probabilities, (iii) modal and sensitivity analysis to identify dominant fault pathways and parameter sensitivities, (iv) ANOVA and multivariate analysis to compare topology-induced resilience across device chemistries and operating regimes, and (v) thematic analysis of diagnostic logs to extract actionable fault signatures. The analytical framework will be implemented in a unified modeling environment that interlinks device physics, circuit dynamics, and reliability forecasting. Expected findings include (i) a cohesive multi-scale model that accurately predicts performance degradation and fault propagation under thermal, electrical, and aging stresses; (ii) a probabilistic resilience metric set enabling comparative assessment of fault-tolerant configurations and control reconfigurations; (iii) validated guidelines for selecting device technologies and topologies that optimize reliability without compromising efficiency; and (iv) a diagnostic decision-support framework capable of early fault detection, isolation, and mitigation strategies embedded within a model-based controller. The study contributes to knowledge by delivering the first integrated framework that harmonizes physics-based device models with topology-aware circuit representations and probabilistic reliability analysis for fault-tolerant power electronics. It provides a transferable modeling approach applicable to grid-tied converters, electric vehicle powertrains, and industrial drives, along with design guidelines and diagnostic strategies that bridge the gap between theoretical resilience and practical implementation. The central conclusion anticipates that the unified framework significantly enhances prediction accuracy of fault impact and enables proactive fault management, thereby extending mean time between failures and reducing downtime. Recommendations include adopting a standardized data collection protocol for fault signatures, integrating the framework into HIL testing for new converter designs, and extending the model to accommodate emerging wide-bandgap materials as standard practice in reliability-oriented design.
Thesis Overview
This research explores a unified framework for fault-tolerant power electronics modeling, aiming to create a comprehensive and coherent approach that can automatically handle faults across different power-electronic systems. It matters because fault conditions—such as short circuits, open circuits, component aging, and control-loop disturbances—can cause reduced performance, safety risks, or system failure in converters, inverters, and motor drive platforms. A unified model helps designers reason about reliability, diagnose issues, and validate control strategies more efficiently than fragmented, system-specific methods.
The central problem is the lack of a generalizable modeling framework that integrates electrical, thermal, and control-domain fault effects with consistent assumptions across devices (e.g., IGBTs, MOSFETs, diodes) and topologies (DC-DC, DC-AC, AC-AC). This leads to ad hoc fault analysis that scales poorly when new topologies or devices are introduced. The research addresses this gap by proposing a modular, multi-domain model skeleton that can accommodate different devices, fault modes, and operating conditions while preserving mathematical tractability.
Step-by-step plan
- Define scope and select representative topologies (e.g., bidirectional DC-DC, two-level inverter) and devices.
- Develop a modular modeling framework that couples electrical, thermal, and control subsystems under fault conditions.
- Incorporate fault taxonomy (short circuit, open-circuit, parameter degradation, sensor/actuator faults) and represent them within the framework.
- Derive state-space or bond-graph representations for each module with parameters that reflect aging and fault states.
- Collect data from publicly available datasets and experimental rigs with controlled fault injections; target a sample size of 20–30 fault scenarios per topology.
- Validate the framework using simulation (MATLAB/Simulink, Python) and experimental tests to compare fault propagation and system response.
- Analyze results using regression-based sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulations to assess robustness and reliability.
- Provide guidelines for model calibration, validation, and extension to new devices.
Expected contribution and outcome
- A reusable, scalable fault-tolerant modeling framework with clearly defined interfaces between modules.
- A formal method to integrate multi-domain fault effects into power-electronic system analysis.
- Practical validation across multiple topologies showing improved predictability of fault impact and more efficient design exploration.
This work enables engineers to design more reliable power-electronic systems and to simulate and compare fault-tolerant strategies with a consistent, theory-backed approach.