A Dynamic Framework for Endogenous Climate Risk and Asset Prices
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.
- 1.1Introduction: Contextualizing Endogenous Climate Risk in Asset Pricing
- 2.
- 1.2Background of the Study: Climate-Asset Interaction under Structural Uncertainty
- 3.
- 1.3Statement of the Problem: Gaps in Dynamic Modeling of Climate Risk and Prices
- 4.
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study: Constructing a Dynamic Endogenous Framework
- 5.
- 1.5Research Questions: What Drives Endogenous Climate Risk Shocks to Prices?
- 6.
- 1.6Research Hypotheses: Mechanisms Linking Climate States to Asset Valuations
- 7.
- 1.7Significance of the Study: Policy and Market Implications of the Dynamic Framework
- 8.
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study: Temporal and Cross-Asset Boundaries
- 9.
- 1.9Limitations of the Study: Model Assumptions and Data Constraints
- 10.
- 1.10Organisation of the Study: Roadmap from Theory to Empirical Validation
- 11.
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms: Key Variables and Indicators
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 12.
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Climate Risk as a Dynamic State Variable
- 13.
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Asset Pricing under State-Dependent Risk Premia
- 14.
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium with Climate States
- 15.
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: RealOptions and Climate-Driven Asset Valuation
- 16.
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: Heterogeneous Agents and Endogenous Risk Formation
- 17.
- 2.6Empirical Review: Climate Risk Channels in Equity Markets
- 18.
- 2.7Empirical Review: Climate Risk and Fixed Income Prices
- 19.
- 2.8Empirical Review: Commodity Markets and Climate Shocks
- 20.
- 2.9Empirical Review: Volatility and Tail Risk in Climate-Linked Assets
- 21.
- 2.10Empirical Review: Network Effects of Climate Policy on Prices
- 22.
- 2.11Identified Gaps in the Literature: Where Endogeneity Has Been Understated
- 23.
- 2.12Conceptual Model or Summary of the Review: Integrating Climate States with Asset Pricing
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 24.
- 3.1Research Design: Dynamic Model Building and Simulation with Real-World Data
- 25.
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Post-Positive Realism in Economic Modelling
- 26.
- 3.3Population of the Study: Global Financial Markets and Climate-Linked Assets
- 27.
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Asset Classes Across Time and Regions
- 28.
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Market Data, Climate Indices, and Policy Announcements
- 29.
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Construct Validity for Climate State Proxies
- 30.
- 3.7Data Harmonization and Pre-Processing: Syncing Climate and Financial Series
- 31.
- 3.8Model Specification or Analytical Framework: Dynamic Endogenous Climate-Asset Pricing Model
- 32.
- 3.9Estimation Techniques: Maximum Likelihood, Kalman Filtering, and Bayesian Methods
- 33.
- 3.10Hypothesis Testing Procedures: State-Dependent Price Responses and Risk Premia
- 34.
- 3.11Simulation and Scenario Analysis: Policy Shock Scenarios and Climate Transitions
- 35.
- 3.12Ethical Considerations: Data Privacy, Transparency, and Reproducibility
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 36.
- 4.1Data Presentation: Descriptive Overview of Climate States and Asset Prices
- 37.
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Summary Statistics and Stationarity Diagnostics
- 38.
- 4.3Model Estimation Results: Parameter Estimates for Endogenous Climate Risk
- 39.
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Evidence of State-Dependent Price Dynamics
- 40.
- 4.5Robustness Checks: Alternative Specifications and Sub-Sample Analyses
- 41.
- 4.6Interpretation of Results: Mechanisms Linking Climate States to Asset Prices
- 42.
- 4.7Discussion of Findings: Alignment with or Divergence from Theoretical Predictions
- 43.
- 4.8Implications for Investors and Policy Makers: Practical Consequences of the Dynamic Framework
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 44.
- 5.1Summary of Findings: Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Insights
- 45.
- 5.2Conclusion: The Viability and Limitations of the Dynamic Endogenous Framework
- 46.
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Advancing Theory of Climate-Asset Interactions
- 47.
- 5.4Recommendations for Practice: Market and Regulatory Implications
- 48.
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies: Extensions and Data Enhancements
Thesis Abstract
This study develops a dynamic framework to quantify endogenous climate risk and its impact on asset prices, addressing the gap in traditional asset pricing models that treat climate shocks as exogenous disturbances. The research responds to the rising evidence that climate risk is embedded within macro-financial markets and can influence risk premia, beta dynamics, and intertemporal consumption–investment decisions. The aim is to construct a parsimonious yet flexible model that jointly characterizes climate-driven risk channels, including physical risk, transition risk, and policy uncertainty, and to evaluate their effects on asset pricing in equity and fixed-income markets. Specific objectives are (i) to formulate a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) framework augmented with climate state variables that are endogenously determined by emissions trajectories, technological transitions, and policy regimes; (ii) to derive asset pricing implications for equity returns, option premia, and sovereign yields under climate-induced risk scenarios; (iii) to calibrate the model using multi-country panel data covering 25 developed and emerging markets over 1995–2024 and a climate risk index constructed from IPCC scenarios, policy announcements, and carbon intensity metrics; and (iv) to perform counterfactual analyses to isolate the contribution of endogenous climate risk to observed asset price dynamics. The methodology employs a combination of structural estimation and simulation. The population comprises macro-financial variables and climate indicators at the annual frequency; a balanced panel of 25 countries with data on stock index returns, government bond yields, GDP, consumption, investment, and emissions forms the sample. Data collection combines (a) financial time series from Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters Eikon, (b) climate data from the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) scenarios and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, and (c) policy variables from central bank and government sources. The instrument set includes global risk factors, term structure signals, and climate policy announcements to identify exogenous variation in climate risk channels. The model specification extends a two-country DSGE framework with endogenous climate dynamics by embedding climate state variables that respond to accumulation of emissions, technological progress, carbon pricing, and policy stringency. Asset prices are derived via a no-arbitrage condition in a representative agent setting, with preferences incorporating Epstein–Zin utility to capture risk and intertemporal substitution. The estimation strategy combines maximum likelihood with Bayesian nested sampling and particle filtering to fit the dynamic system, while impulse response analysis and variance decomposition assess the relative importance of climate channels. The analysis of equity markets uses panel regression cases with asset pricing tests focusing on the equity risk premium, conditional beta, and downside risk measures, and sovereign markets are examined through term premium and yield curve dynamics under climate stress scenarios. Key expected findings include (i) endogenous climate risk significantly amplifies time-varying risk premia during high policy uncertainty periods, (ii) transition risk, captured through policy stringency and technology diffusion parameters, systematically lowers the price of carbon-intensive assets while raising the risk-adjusted required return on greener assets, (iii) climate state variables contribute to a downward-sloping term premium in long-duration bonds during transition phases, and (iv) model-implied asset prices exhibit improved fit and forecast accuracy relative to standard consumption-based or CAPM-like models, particularly in episodes of climate policy shocks. Robustness checks are performed using subsamples, alternative climate indices, and out-of-sample forecasting. The study contributes to knowledge by providing a coherent dynamic framework that embeds endogenous climate risk into asset pricing, offering a measurable link between climate dynamics and financial decisions, and delivering policy-relevant insights on how climate policy and technological transitions shape asset valuations. The main conclusion is that endogenous climate risk constitutes a systemic channel through which macro-financial linkages operate, warranting explicit monitoring in risk management and asset allocation. Recommendations include integrating climate state variables into central bank stress testing, improving cross-market climate risk disclosure, and prioritizing investments in climate-resilient and low-carbon assets to mitigate Climate-Related Financial Risk.
Thesis Overview
This thesis aims to develop a dynamic framework in which climate risk emerges endogenously from economic and financial interactions, and in turn drives asset prices. In other words, rather than treating climate risk as an exogenous shock, the study models how market participants, firm investment decisions, policy responses, and physical climate processes interact over time to generate climate-related financial risks that feed back into asset valuations. This matters because the growing visibility of climate-related events can alter risk premia, corporate cash flows, debt sustainability, and portfolio diversification, potentially creating systemic financial implications.
Key problem and knowledge gap
- Existing models often treat climate risk as exogenous or rely on static risk assessments that fail to capture feedback loops between macro-financial dynamics and evolving climate outcomes.
- There is limited understanding of how endogenous climate risk affects asset prices across different asset classes (equities, bonds, derivatives) and time horizons.
- A coherent framework that integrates stochastic climate processes, firm-level adaptation, and financial market dynamics is needed to improve pricing, risk management, and policy evaluation.
What the researcher will do (step by step)
1. Develop a theoretical model where climate risk factors are generated by interacting agents (investors, firms, policymakers) and natural climate processes, producing time-varying risk premia.
2. Specify an econometric or agent-based representation to capture feedback loops between investment decisions, adaptation expenditures, and climate transitions.
3. Collect data on macro-financial indicators, climate policy signals, firm-level earnings and capital expenditure, and asset prices for a multi-year panel across developed and emerging markets.
4. Calibrate the model to historical episodes of climate shocks and policy changes; implement scenario analysis for future emissions pathways.
5. Estimate the model using appropriate methods (multivariate time-series with regime-switching, structural VAR, or agent-based simulations) to identify how endogenous climate risk propagates to asset prices.
6. Test hypotheses about risk premia, price volatility, and cross-asset spillovers under different adaptation and policy scenarios.
7. Validate results through out-of-sample forecasting exercises and robustness checks.
Expected contribution and outcome
- A unified framework that endogenizes climate risk within financial dynamics, improving understanding of asset price formation under climate stress.
- Insights into how adaptation, policy, and market expectations shape risk premia and asset valuations.
- Practical implications for risk management, asset pricing models, and climate-related financial disclosure.
Possible applications
- Forecasting asset price responses to climate announcements, insurance losses, and transition policies.
- Informing central banks and regulators on systemic risk from climate dynamics.