Civil society organization and democratic consolidation in nigeria and ghana, 2003 – 2013
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Civil Society Organizations
- 2.2Historical Development of Civil Society Organizations
- 2.3Role of Civil Society Organizations in Democracy
- 2.4Challenges Faced by Civil Society Organizations
- 2.5Impact of Civil Society Organizations on Democratic Consolidation
- 2.6Civil Society Organizations in Nigeria
- 2.7Civil Society Organizations in Ghana
- 2.8A Comparative Analysis of Civil Society Organizations in Nigeria and Ghana
- 2.9Best Practices of Civil Society Organizations
- 2.10Future Trends in Civil Society Organizations
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Sampling Techniques
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Validity and Reliability
- 3.7Limitations of the Methodology
- 3.8Research Assumptions
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Civil Society Organizations' Impact on Democratic Consolidation
- 4.3Comparison of Findings in Nigeria and Ghana
- 4.4Key Success Factors of Civil Society Organizations
- 4.5Challenges Hindering the Effectiveness of Civil Society Organizations
- 4.6Recommendations for Strengthening Civil Society Organizations
- 4.7Implications of Findings
- 4.8Future Research Directions
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Implications for Policy and Practice
- 5.5Recommendations for Future Research
Thesis Abstract
Civil Society Organizations played an instrumental role in the restoration of democracy in Nigeria and Ghana and in recognition of their important role in democratic transition in both countries they were considered by both scholars and international organizations as a veritable tool for democratic consolidation. The argument that CSOs aid democratic consolidation in both countries and account for the dissimilarities in democratic consolidation necessitated this study. Therefore, the study examined the nexus between civil society organizations and democratic consolidation in Nigeria and Ghana and noted like in other studies that CSOs in both countries suffer from lack of unity, communication gap, inadequate personnel, among others. Hence, this study deduced that civil society organizations in both states perform similar functions and share the same problems. In this context, the study argues that it is not CSOs that account for the differences in democratic consolidation as regards free and fair election and the alternation of power between the two major political parties in Ghana. The study posited that the differences in the nature and character of both states are the underlying factor that account for the marked differences in democratic consolidation in both states. The study made use of ex-post facto research design, qualitative method of data collection, qualitative/descriptive method of data analysis and adopted the theory of post-colonial states. The study noted that CSOs do contribute to democratic consolidation in both states but are facing problems associated with post-colonial states and that the nature and character of both states influence the roles of CSOs in the process of democratic consolidation and this is what account for the differences in democratic consolidation in both countries. It recommended among others, the strengthening of CSOs by government of both states, adequate funding by donor agencies and adoption of effective method by CSOs stakeholders to engage the state.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><div><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong><br><strong>1.1</strong> <strong>Background to the Study</strong><br>Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) among several forces played an instrumental role in the restoration of democracy in developing countries, and such pivotal roles ushered in the third wave of democratization in Africa especially in Nigeria and Ghana (Huntington, 1993; Diamond, 1999; Gyimah-Boadi, 1996; Aidoo, 2006; Imade, 2007; Ojo, 2011; Majeed, 2011; Odeh , 2012). Before the return to democracy in Nigeria and Ghana, the governments in both states especially during the military regimes, hitherto were unaccountable and despotic, and became even more authoritarian as they embarked on unpopular and belt-tightening policies like Austerity Measures, Structural Adjustment Programmes, among others. Also, during this period, the governments were marred by executive lawlessness, human rights abuse and reckless political decisions making. This activated the civil society, determined to check-mate the erosion of rights, freedom and civic values. The conjecture was characterized by intense restlessness among citizens and civic groups, which demanded for democracy, participation and justice (Odeh, 2012).<br>As a result of their above roles, CSOs are considered very central to the current wave of democratization in Africa, in terms of its restoration; were democracy has been absent or was scuttled and consolidation; were their exist democratic institutions but requires to be strengthened. Little wonder, scholars like Diamond (1999); Young (2000); Kew (2005); Imade (2007); Ojo (2011); Majeed (2011); among others have in their various studies posited strongly that civil society organizations were crucial in the restoration of democracy in Africa and according to these scholars, CSOs have greater roles to play in the consolidation and deepening of democracy in Africa. They argued separately and strongly that, if democracy is to be sustained and consolidated in Africa, then vibrant CSOs are not only important but necessary. In line with<br>the above, Hadenius and Uggla (1996) cited in Majeed (2011:12) contends that:<br>An active civil society is a necessary condition for the<br>development of a democratic system of governance…….only the free practice of democracy found<br>in civil sphere can promote the development of the democratic popular culture that makes the rule by the people a feasible option<br>According to Encarnacion (2003), a consolidated democracy appears to depend on the existence<br>of a vibrant civil society. They do this by performing the following functions thus:<br>In recent times……, CSOs do execute diverse programs<br>such as voter’s education, election observation, campaign finance monitoring, election tribunal monitoring, electoral reforms advocacy, conflict mitigation, access to justice, public interest litigation, budget tracking, constituency outreaches as well as research and documentation in thematic areas of democracy and governance (Odeh, 2012:61).<br>Furthermore, CSOs are considered catalyst for change, healthy for enhancing good governance<br>and democracy because they are placed in the limelight to fight for, maintain as well as deepen<br>democratic values in Nigeria and Ghana. According to Monga (2009) CSOs have been identified<br>as one of the key actors that are capable of facilitating the processes of democratic consolidation,<br>particularly in emerging democracies (Nigeria and Ghana). In this context, Hearn (1999) posited<br>that a thriving civil society can widen democracy by promoting pluralism, and can deepen<br>democracy by embedding the values and institutions of liberal democracy within society at large,<br>not simply at the state level but also nationally, and indeed, globally. Hence, international<br>organization and governments tend to invest significant amount of resources in strengthening<br>civil society, particularly in developing countries (Nigeria and Ghana) with the goal of<br>consolidating their democracies.</p><p></p></div><h3></h3><br>
<br><p></p>