A Resilience-Based Framework for Post-Occupancy Evaluation in Green Buildings
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.
- 1.1Introduction
- 2.
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 3.
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 4.
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 5.
- 1.5Research Questions
- 6.
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 7.
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 8.
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 9.
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 10.
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 11.
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 1.
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Defining Resilience in Post-Occupancy Evaluation
- 2.
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Green Building Performance and Occupant Outcomes
- 3.
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Resilience Theory and Systems Theory
- 4.
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Activity Theory and Social-Ecological Systems
- 5.
- 2.5Empirical Review: Post-Occupancy Evaluation Practices in Green Buildings
- 6.
- 2.6Empirical Review: Resilience-Based Evaluations in Built Environment Studies
- 7.
- 2.7Empirical Review: Stakeholder Engagement in OP-E Research
- 8.
- 2.8Empirical Review: Instrumentation and Metrics for Green Building OP-E
- 9.
- 2.9Identified Gaps in the Literature: The OP?E Resilience Nexus
- 10.
- 2.10Conceptual Model Synthesis: From Theory to OP?E in Green Buildings
- 11.
- 2.11Summary of Key Learnings for the New Framework
- 12.
- 2.12Rationale for a Resilience-Based OP-E Framework
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 1.
- 3.1Research Design: Theory-Driven Model Development and Mixed-Methods Validation
- 2.
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in Architectural Research
- 3.
- 3.3Population of the Study: Stakeholders in Green Building OP-E Programs
- 4.
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Stratified and purposive sampling for Sustainability Projects
- 5.
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Surveys, Interviews, OP-E Case Audits
- 6.
- 3.6Instrument Validity and Reliability: Content Validity, Pilot Testing, and Triangulation
- 7.
- 3.7Data Analysis Methods: Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and Thematic Analysis
- 8.
- 3.8Model Specification: Formalizing the Resilience-Based OP-E Framework
- 9.
- 3.9Ethical Considerations: Consent, Confidentiality, and Data Protection
- 10.
- 3.10Pilot Study and Iterative Refinement: Ensuring Robustness of the Framework
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
- 1.
- 4.1Data Presentation: OP-E Case Profiles in Green Buildings
- 2.
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: stakeholder Perceptions of Resilience in Occupant Outcomes
- 3.
- 4.3Factor Structure and Reliability Outcomes: OP-E Instrument Validation
- 4.
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Relationships Between Resilience Constructs and Performance Metrics
- 5.
- 4.5Multivariate Analysis: Pathways from Design Features to Occupant Wellbeing
- 6.
- 4.6Interpretation of Results: How Resilience Modulates OP-E Outcomes
- 7.
- 4.7Discussion in Relation to Theoretical Frameworks: Resilience and Systems Thinking
- 8.
- 4.8Comparative Discussion: Green vs. Conventional Buildings under OP?E Lens
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 1.
- 5.1Summary of Findings: A Resilience-Based OP-E Framework Emerges
- 2.
- 5.2Conclusion: Implications for Theory and Practice in Green Buildings
- 3.
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Advancing OP-E Methodologies and Resilience Theory
- 4.
- 5.4Practical Recommendations for Practitioners and Policymakers
- 5.
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies: Longitudinal Validation and Cross-Context Applications
Thesis Abstract
Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) in green buildings has often focused on biophysical performance, with limited integration of resilience concepts to address post-occupancy realities under evolving climatic, social, and operational stresses. This study develops a resilience-based framework for POE to systematically assess, diagnose, and enhance the long-term adaptive capacity of green buildings. The aim is to (i) operationalize resilience in the POE context, (ii) identify determinants of performance variability across time and occupants, and (iii) propose actionable strategies for design, operation, and policy to sustain green building performance. Specific objectives include (1) conceptualising a resilience-based POE model integrating physical, behavioral, and climatic dimensions; (2) mapping relevant indicators across structural, operational, and social subsystems; (3) validating the framework through empirical POE data from a sample of certified green buildings; (4) examining the interaction between occupant behavior, building management practices, and system resilience; and (5) delivering a practical toolkit for practitioners to monitor, predict, and mitigate performance degradation under disturbance events. A mixed-methods research design will be employed, combining quantitative survey data, building performance metrics, and qualitative interviews. The population comprises green-certified office buildings in a metropolitan region with high adoption of energy efficiency and low-carbon strategies. A stratified random sample of 30 buildings will be selected, with at least 15 providing at least one year of post-occupancy performance data. Within each building, a representative sample of occupants (n ? 20–30 per site) and building managers (n ? 5 per site) will be surveyed and interviewed. Data collection instruments include a resilience-oriented POE questionnaire adapted from established occupant comfort and satisfaction scales, building management records, energy and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) performance data, and semi-structured interview guides. Instrument validity and reliability will be ensured through content validity with a panel of experts and pilot testing (Cronbach’s alpha targets ?0.80 for multi-item scales). Quantitative data will be analyzed using structural equation modeling to test the relationships among physical performance, resilience indicators, and occupant outcomes; regression analysis will identify predictors of post-occupancy resilience; and time-series analyses will examine performance trajectories under disturbances. Qualitative data will be analyzed using thematic analysis to uncover salient resilience mechanisms, with triangulation against quantitative findings. The analytical framework will be anchored in organizational resilience theory and the socio-technical systems perspective, incorporating concepts from the Theory of Planned Behavior to interpret occupant interactions, and the Multi-Level Perspective on sustainability transitions to contextualize scale effects. A conceptual model will be iteratively refined through empirical results. Key expected findings include (i) a validated resilience-based POE model that links structural and environmental performance with occupant behavior and management practices; (ii) identification of critical resilience indicators such as adaptive maintenance capacity, sensor-data reliability, occupant cognitive load, and operational redundancy; (iii) quantified relationships showing that proactive management practices and real-time feedback loops significantly elevate resilience scores and reduce performance volatility during disturbances such as heat waves or unexpected occupancy surges; and (iv) evidence that occupancy patterns and retrofit readiness moderate resilience outcomes, informing prioritization of retrofit investments. The study’s contribution to knowledge lies in integrating resilience theory with POE to produce a practical framework and toolkit that enables continuous learning and adaptive optimization of green buildings. It advances methodological combine of SEM, time-series, and thematic analysis within a POE context and extends understanding of how social and organizational dimensions interact with technical systems to sustain environmental performance. Policy implications include guidance for post-occupancy monitoring requirements, performance-based maintenance regimes, and occupant-oriented strategies that reinforce resilience in green buildings. The main conclusion is that resilience-centered POE provides a robust, integrative approach to maintaining and enhancing green building performance in the face of dynamic disturbances. Practical recommendations include implementing a resilience dashboard for ongoing monitoring, establishing adaptive maintenance protocols, integrating occupant feedback mechanisms into building management systems, and prioritizing retrofit plans that improve system redundancy and data reliability. Further research could explore cross-cultural validations, longer longitudinal studies to capture seasonality and aging effects, and the extension of the framework to other building typologies such as mixed-use developments and high-rise residential towers.
Thesis Overview
This research breaks down how building occupants experience and use green buildings after they are constructed, with a focus on resilience—how buildings continue to perform well under everyday use and unexpected events (like weather shocks, occupancy fluctuations, or maintenance challenges). It combines post-occupancy evaluation (POE), which assesses actual building performance from user perspectives, with resilience theory to identify gaps between design intent and real-life outcomes, and to propose improvements that make green buildings more robust over time.
Why it matters: Green buildings are designed to be energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, but their long-term success depends on how people interact with them and how they adapt to changing conditions. POE alone often misses the dynamic, real-world conditions that threaten performance. A resilience-based POE aims to reveal not only whether a building performs as intended, but how organizational, social, and physical factors enable or hinder sustained performance under disturbance.
What problem or gap it addresses: There is a need for a systematic framework that links occupant experiences, measured performance, and resilience concepts to diagnose why green buildings may underperform or degrade in efficiency, comfort, or functionality over time. Existing POE studies tend to be static and discipline-specific; this study integrates resilience theory to capture temporal and contextual variability.
What the researcher will do, step by step:
- Develop a resilience-informed POE framework that specifies indicators for physical performance, occupant comfort, and organizational responses to disturbances.
- Select a sample of 15–20 green-certified office buildings across a metropolitan area and recruit building occupants and facilities staff as participants.
- Data collection: administer standardized surveys on occupant satisfaction, comfort, and perceived resilience; conduct in-depth interviews with facilities managers; gather building performance data (energy use, indoor environmental quality metrics) from building management systems; perform targeted on-site observations.
- Data analysis: use descriptive statistics and regression analysis to relate occupant responses to measured performance; apply thematic analysis to interview transcripts to extract resilience-related themes; integrate results in a cross-case synthesis.
- Model development: propose a practical, testable framework linking inputs (design features, management practices) to outputs (resilience outcomes, POE indicators).
Expected contributions and outcomes: a validated framework that helps designers, operators, and researchers assess and enhance the resilience of green buildings through POE, with actionable recommendations for design adjustments, operational protocols, and policy guidance to sustain performance under varied conditions. Potentially, a set of resilience indicators and a scalable assessment protocol suitable for different building types.