A multivariate analysis on the response of crops to fertilizer and soil types. (a case study of the federal university of agriculture umudike, abia st…
Table Of Contents
Thesis Abstract
Abstract
This study conducted a comprehensive multivariate analysis on the response of crops to fertilizer application and different soil types at the Federal University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State. The research aimed to evaluate the interactive effects of fertilizer application and soil types on crop growth and yield. The study focused on major crops grown in the region, including maize, cassava, and soybeans, commonly cultivated by local farmers. A field experiment was set up with various treatments combining different types of fertilizers and soil types to assess their impact on crop performance. Data on plant height, leaf area, number of leaves, and yield were collected and subjected to multivariate analysis techniques. The analysis included principal component analysis (PCA) to identify patterns and relationships among the variables and discriminate between the different treatments. Results of the study revealed significant interactions between fertilizer application, soil types, and crop responses. The PCA showed distinct groupings of the different treatments based on the variables measured, indicating specific trends in crop growth and yield. The findings suggested that certain fertilizers were more effective in specific soil types, highlighting the importance of considering both factors in agricultural practices. Furthermore, the study identified key factors influencing crop productivity, such as nutrient availability, soil pH, and organic matter content. These factors were found to have a significant impact on crop growth and development, emphasizing the need for tailored fertilizer application based on soil characteristics. The research also highlighted the importance of sustainable agricultural practices to ensure long-term soil fertility and crop productivity. Overall, the multivariate analysis provided valuable insights into the complex relationships between fertilizer application, soil types, and crop responses. The findings contribute to the existing knowledge on optimizing agricultural practices for improved crop production and yield. The results of this study can guide local farmers and agricultural practitioners in making informed decisions regarding fertilizer use and soil management to enhance crop productivity and sustainability in the region.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><p><b>1.0. <br></b><b>INTRODUCTION</b></p><p>Crop<br>production is an integral part of agriculture, the other half is animal<br>production or husbandry. Crop production can either be on a subsistence or<br>commercial level. It is subsistence when the farmer produces for himself and<br>family with a little for sale but it can be commercial when the farmer produces<br>in a large scale for market consumption. Whichever type of production a farmer<br>wants to embark upon, the knowledge of fertilizer and the nature of the soil is<br>of utmost importance as this would go a long way in determining the farmers<br>output. Since the 90’s agriculture in Nigeria that use to be at the front<br>burner as the nation’s chief income earner as suddenly taken a back stage as a<br>result of over dependency on crude. Agriculture overtime as been a major<br>sustainer of Nigeria’s economy before the discovery of crude oil otherwise<br>known as black gold (okoro 2005). Since its relegation to the background in<br>Nigeria, it has been practiced at an alarming peasant level with most of the<br>active stakeholder been largely subsistence agriculturists. Soil and fertilizer<br>type are very significant factors in crop production. It is highly<br>heterogeneous and this is the cause of differential rates of growth and yield<br>on a parcel of land planted to the same crop at the same time and with the same<br>management package (Olalokun, 1998). This is a source of frustration to crop<br>farming as farmers cannot think of a particular management package suitable for<br>their farmlands. Intensive cultivation and fertilizer application have become<br>the cardinal aspect of soil management especially in the West African sub<br>region. The Response to fertilizer<br>application in some cases is nothing to write home about; hence many farmers<br>have been forced to abandon their farmlands.</p><p><b>Types of fertilizers</b></p><p>Fertilizers<br>can broadly be grouped into two parts namely:</p><p><b>i. <br></b><b>Organic<br>fertilizers</b></p><p>As<br>the name implies, these are fertilizers derived from human excreta, animal and<br>plant matter such as compost and manure. Organic fertilizers generally have<br>lower nutrient concentration than inorganic fertilizers.</p><p><b>Advantages of organic<br>fertilizers</b></p><p>The<br>following are the advantages of organic fertilizers</p><p>· <br>They do not harm or burn plants when<br>excessively applied on crops.</p><p>· <br>They do not damage ground water.</p><p>· <br>When applied on farmlands, they have long<br>term positive effects on farmlands.</p><p>· <br>Organic fertilizers are renewable, biodegradable, sustainable, and<br>environmentally friendly.</p><p>· <br>Although rather expensive in packages, you can make your own<br>organic fertilizer by composting or find inexpensive sources—such as local<br>dairy farms—that may sell composted manure.</p><p><b>Disadvantages of organic fertilizers</b></p><ul><li>Organic fertilizers break down according to nature’s<br>rules, so they may not release nutrients as soon as you need them. You<br>have to be patient – you won’t see improvement overnight. In fact, you may<br>actually see a deficiency in your plants during the first couple of months<br>until the first application breaks down. Hang in there! You’ll most<br>definitely be rewarded.</li><li>Nutrient ratios are often unknown, and the overall<br>percentage is lower than chemical fertilizers. However, some organic<br>products are actually higher in certain nutrients.</li></ul><p><b>ii. <br></b><b>Inorganic<br>fertilizer</b></p><p>Inorganic<br>fertilizers are synthetic fertilizers that are produced from chemical or<br>synthetic materials with defined proportion of desired chemicals that are<br>beneficial to crops.</p><p><b> Advantages of inorganic fertilizers</b></p><ul><li>Since nutrients are available to the plants<br>immediately, improvement occurs in days.</li><li>They are highly analyzed to produce the exact ratio of<br>nutrients desired.</li><li>Standardized labeling makes ratios and chemical sources<br>easy to understand.</li><li>They’re inexpensive.</li></ul><p><b>Disadvantages of inorganic<br>fertilizers</b></p><p>· <br>If excessively applied, they can burn or<br>harm plants.</p><p>· <br>When applied, it can cause water or air<br>pollution.</p><ul><li>Chemical<br>fertilizers tend to leach, or filter away from the plants, requiring<br>additional applications.</li><li>Long-term<br>use of chemical fertilizer can change the soil pH, upset beneficial<br>microbial ecosystems, increase pests, and even contribute to the release<br>of greenhouse gases.</li></ul><p><b>1.1. <br></b><b>STATEMENT OF THE GENERAL<br>PROBLEM</b></p><p>In Nigeria today, crop production has been<br>largely inconsistent resulting to the lack of knowledge of the combination of<br>soil type and fertilizer. This has led to general under production of crops in<br>Nigeria. An adequate knowledge on the right combination would help to increase<br>crop production and maintain that for a long time. There is equally a concern<br>by farmers and researchers on the best type of fertilizer between organic and<br>inorganic fertilizers to be used to increase crop yield. Researchers are also<br>interested in knowing if inorganic or organic fertilizers performances are soil<br>based. Another problem of farmers is to know the relationship between soil type<br>and crop yield.</p><p><b>1.2. <br></b><b>AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF<br>THE STUDY</b></p><p>This<br>study is aimed at the following:</p><p>1. To<br>know if there is a relationship and the nature of this relationship (if any)<br>between soil type, fertilizer type and crop yield.</p><p>2. To<br>know if there is a relationship between soil type and crop yield.</p><p>3. To<br>know if there is a relationship between fertilizer type and crop yield.</p><p>4. To<br>know the best combination of fertilizer and soil type that yields more crops.</p><p><b>1.3. <br></b><b>SIGNIFICANCE<br>OF THE STUDY</b></p><p>The<br>significance or importance of this study is mainly to know if there is any<br>relationship between fertilizer type, nature of soil and crop yield. Another<br>importance of this survey is to know the soil type that encourages more crop<br>yield. A major significance of this<br>study is to know if there is a relationship between the following:</p><p>Soil<br>type and crop yield, soil fertilizer type and crop yield. The nature of these<br>relationships (if any) is also of utmost importance to us.</p><p><b>1.4. <br></b><b>SCOPE<br>AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY</b></p><p>For<br>the purpose of this study as the topic depicts, the scope of the study will be<br>focused on how crops respond to the types of fertilization in each of the<br>different types of soils. Another scope is to know if a relationship exists<br>between fertilizer type, soil type and crop yield. A major scope is to know the<br>best combination of fertilizer type and soil nature or type that enhances crop<br>yield. In the earlier stage of the study there is a detailed coverage of the<br>techniques and methods used in judging whether crops responded well or not to<br>fertilization by looking at their performances.</p><p><b>LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY</b></p><p>It<br>is necessary to mention some of the limitation of this research work. The chief<br>limitation is the difficulty in obtaining relevant information in that a few of<br>our values were missing but these missing values were not statistically<br>significant enough to be noticed.</p><p>Notwithstanding,<br>in the highlighted limitation above, it is hoped that this research will be<br>useful to agricultural researchers, farmers and other similar organization that<br>may want to know the general response of crops to the types of fertilization on<br>different soils.</p><p><b>1.5. <br></b><b>DEFINITION<br>OF TERMS</b></p><p>i. <br><b>Organic:<br></b>produced<br>by or from living things.</p><p>ii. <br><b>Inorganic:</b><br>not consisting of or coming from any living substances.</p><p>iii. <br><b>Fertilizer:</b> a substance added to soil to make plants grow<br>more successfully.</p><p>iv. <br><b>Crops:</b><br>a plant that is grown in large quantities, especially as food.</p><p>v. <br><b>Synthetic:</b><br>artificial; made by combining chemical substances rather than being produced<br>naturally by plants or animals.</p><p>vi. <br><b>Soil:</b><br>the top layer of the earth, in which plants, trees etc grow.</p><br>
<br><p></p>