Comparative Seroprevalence of Antibodies in Canine and Feline Populations | Blazingprojects Postgraduate Thesis
Home / Veterinary Medicine / Comparative Seroprevalence of Antibodies in Canine and Feline Populations

Comparative Seroprevalence of Antibodies in Canine and Feline Populations

 

Table Of Contents


Chapter ONE

INTRODUCTION

  • 1.
  • 1.1Introduction
  • 2.
  • 1.2Background of the Study
  • 3.
  • 1.3Statement of the Problem
  • 4.
  • 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
  • 5.
  • 1.5Research Questions
  • 6.
  • 1.6Research Hypotheses
  • 7.
  • 1.7Significance of the Study
  • 8.
  • 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
  • 9.
  • 1.9Limitations of the Study
  • 10.
  • 1.10Organisation of the Study
  • 11.
  • 1.11Operational Definition of Terms

Chapter TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

  • 1.
  • 2.1Conceptual Review: Seroprevalence in Companion Animals
  • 2.
  • 2.2Conceptual Review: Antibody–Pathogen Dynamics in Dogs and Cats
  • 3.
  • 2.3Theoretical Framework: Epidemiological Triad in Companion Animal Serology
  • 4.
  • 2.4Theoretical Framework: One Health and Integrated Surveillance Theory
  • 5.
  • 2.5Empirical Review: Seroprevalence of Canine Antibodies Across Regions
  • 6.
  • 2.6Empirical Review: Seroprevalence of Feline Antibodies Across Regions
  • 7.
  • 2.7Comparative Serology Methodologies in Veterinary Studies
  • 8.
  • 2.8Representativeness and Sampling in Veterinary Serology
  • 9.
  • 2.9Diagnostic Tests, Sensitivity, and Specificity in Dogs and Cats
  • 10.
  • 2.10Host Factors Influencing Seroprevalence in Canines
  • 11.
  • 2.11Host Factors Influencing Seroprevalence in Felines
  • 12.
  • 2.12Gaps in the Literature on Cross-Species Seroprevalence
  • 13.
  • 2.13Conceptual Model: Cross-Species Seroprevalence Framework

Chapter THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 1.
  • 3.1Research Design: Cross-Sectional Comparative Serology
  • 2.
  • 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism and Mixed-Bias Assessment
  • 3.
  • 3.3Population of the Study: Dogs and Cats Under Veterinary Care
  • 4.
  • 3.4Sample Size Determination and Sampling Technique
  • 5.
  • 3.5Sources of Data: Field Samples and Veterinary Records
  • 6.
  • 3.6Instruments of Data Collection: Serology Assays and Questionnaire
  • 7.
  • 3.7Validity and Reliability of Instruments
  • 8.
  • 3.8Data Collection Procedures and Quality Control
  • 9.
  • 3.9Data Management and Ethical Considerations in Sample Handling
  • 10.
  • 3.10Data Analysis Plan: Statistical Models for Seroprevalence Comparison
  • 11.
  • 3.11Model Specification: Logistic Regression and Multilevel Modeling
  • 12.
  • 3.12Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

Chapter FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

  • ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
  • 1.
  • 4.1Data Presentation: Descriptive Profile of Study Populations
  • 2.
  • 4.2Seroprevalence Estimates in Canines
  • 3.
  • 4.3Seroprevalence Estimates in Felines
  • 4.
  • 4.4Comparative Seroprevalence Across Species
  • 5.
  • 4.5Hypotheses Testing: Species-Based Differences
  • 6.
  • 4.6Multivariable Analysis: Predictors of Seropositivity in Dogs
  • 7.
  • 4.7Multivariable Analysis: Predictors of Seropositivity in Cats
  • 8.
  • 4.8Interpretation of Findings in Context of Literature

Chapter FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

  • CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 1.
  • 5.1Summary of Findings
  • 2.
  • 5.2Conclusions Drawn from Comparative Seroprevalence
  • 3.
  • 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Cross-Species Serology Insights
  • 4.
  • 5.4Practical Implications for Veterinary Public Health
  • 5.
  • 5.5Recommendations for Policy and Practice
  • 6.
  • 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies

Thesis Abstract

Understanding seroprevalence patterns of infectious diseases in companion animals is essential for informing vaccination strategies, disease surveillance, and public health risk assessment. This study addresses the comparative seroprevalence of antibodies against common canine and feline pathogens—specifically Canine Parvovirus (CPV), Canine Distemper Virus (CDV), Feline Panleukopenia Virus (FPV), and Feline Herpesvirus (FHV-1)—in urban and peri-urban populations within a defined metropolitan region, where disparate vaccination uptake and owner practices may influence exposure risk. The aim is to quantify interspecies differences in seroprevalence, identify associated risk factors, and evaluate the concordance between reported vaccination status and serological evidence. Specific objectives are to (i) determine the seroprevalence of CPV, CDV, FPV, and FHV-1 antibodies in dogs and cats; (ii) compare seroprevalence by species, breed, age, sex, and vaccination status; (iii) assess the influence of habitat (household, shelter, or clinic populations) and owner-reported preventive practices on serostatus; (iv) examine associations between seroprevalence and documented vaccination histories using logistic regression; and (v) propose evidence-based recommendations for vaccination and surveillance programs. A cross-sectional design with a stratified sampling approach will be employed. Blood samples (n = 1,200; 600 canine and 600 feline) will be collected from veterinary clinics, animal shelters, and households over 12 months to account for seasonal variation in exposure. Serological analysis will utilize commercially validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for CPV, CDV, FPV, and FHV-1 antibodies, with neutralization tests conducted for a subset (n = 200 per species) to confirm equivocal results. Data on demographics, vaccination history, prior infection, living conditions, and preventive practices will be captured via structured owner questionnaires and veterinary records. Data analysis will proceed in three stages (i) descriptive statistics to estimate seroprevalence and 95% confidence intervals by species, age group, and habitat; (ii) bivariate analyses using chi-square tests and t-tests to identify potential associations; and (iii) multivariable logistic regression models to determine independent predictors of seropositivity for each pathogen, including interaction terms between species and vaccination status. Model fit will be evaluated with Hosmer-Lemeshow tests and area under the ROC curve. A secondary analysis will apply a Bayesian hierarchical framework to account for clustering by collection site and to estimate posterior probabilities of seropositivity given vaccination and exposure variables. Theoretical grounding will draw on the Health Belief Model to interpret owner preventive behaviors and the One Health framework to contextualize cross-species seroprevalence within shared environmental exposures. Expected findings include higher seroprevalence for vaccine-targeted antibodies in vaccinated individuals, residual seropositivity in unvaccinated animals suggesting natural exposure or maternal antibodies, and notable interspecies differences in exposure risk linked to owner practices and living conditions. The study anticipates potential under-vaccination in specific subgroups, with shelter populations exhibiting higher exposure to CPV and FPV compared with household pets. The contribution to knowledge lies in providing robust comparative seroprevalence estimates, identifying actionable risk factors for targeted vaccination and surveillance, and highlighting gaps between vaccination records and serological protection. The study will inform policy recommendations for veterinarian-led vaccination campaigns, guidance for shelter infection control, and community education to improve preventive care. Conclusion and recommendations will emphasize strengthening vaccination uptake, aligning serological surveillance with vaccination records, and enhancing owner awareness of durability of immunity and the potential need for booster doses. Limitations include potential seroreversion over time, cross-reactivity in serological assays, and reliance on owner-reported data. Further research suggestions include longitudinal cohort studies to track seroconversion dynamics, evaluation of maternally derived antibody decay in kittens and puppies, and cost-effectiveness analyses of integrated vaccination-surveillance programs.

Thesis Overview

This study examines how common antibodies are in dogs and cats and what this reveals about exposure to infectious agents and vaccination patterns across species. Seroprevalence is the proportion of animals with detectable antibodies in a population, indicating prior infection or immunization. By comparing canines and felines, the research aims to identify species-specific differences in exposure risk, immune responses, and the impact of management practices such as vaccination schedules and preventive care. Why it matters: Understanding cross-species differences in seroprevalence helps veterinarians tailor vaccination and prevention programs, supports surveillance for emerging pathogens, and informs public health strategies where companion animals interact with humans. The study fills gaps where few direct, contemporary comparisons exist across large, representative canine and feline populations using standardized serological methods. What problem or gap it addresses: There is a need for robust cross-species data on antibody prevalence for key pathogens (e.g., vector-borne, respiratory, or enteric agents) to assess herd-level immunity, guide vaccine policy, and interpret seroprevalence in clinical diagnostics. Differences in lifestyle, exposure, and vaccine uptake between dogs and cats complicate direct comparisons, which this study will address with consistent methodology. What the researcher will do step by step: - Define target pathogens or broad antibody panels based on regional relevance and vaccine schedules. - Design a cross-sectional study and determine an appropriate sample size for each species to achieve adequate statistical power. - Recruit and sample dogs and cats from veterinary clinics, shelters, and community settings to obtain diverse representation. - Collect data using standardized questionnaires (age, sex, vaccination history, living conditions) and biological samples (blood for serology). - Perform serological assays (e.g., ELISA, IFA, or quantitative antibody titers) using validated tests with known sensitivity and specificity. - Analyze data with descriptive statistics to estimate seroprevalence by species, age group, vaccination status, and region. Use inferential methods such as chi-square tests for proportions and logistic regression to identify predictors of seropositivity. - Interpret findings in the context of existing literature and vaccination programs. - Discuss limitations and potential biases, and propose recommendations for practice and policy. What contribution the study will make: It will provide a direct, standardized comparison of antibody prevalence between dogs and cats, offering evidence to optimize vaccination strategies, improve preventive care, and enhance cross-species understanding of exposure risks. What outcome is expected: Clear characterization of relative seroprevalence between the two species across key factors, with actionable insights for clinicians and policymakers to refine companion animal health management.

Blazingprojects Mobile App

📚 Over 50,000 Research Thesis
📱 100% Offline: No internet needed
📝 Over 98 Departments
🔍 Thesis-to-Journal Publication
🎓 Undergraduate/Postgraduate Thesis
📥 Instant Whatsapp/Email Delivery

Blazingprojects App

Related Research

Communication and li. 3 min read

Comparative Analysis of Online Political Discourse Across Languages and Platforms...

This research examines how political talk online differs when it is expressed in different languages and across various digital platforms, such as social media,...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Art and Design. 3 min read

Comparative Analysis of AI-Assisted Design in East Asia and Europe...

This research investigates how AI-assisted design practices differ between East Asia and Europe, focusing on designers’ workflows, tool adoption, and the resu...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Applied science. 3 min read

Comparative Analysis of Soil Contaminant Removal by Phytoremediation Systems...

This research investigates how different phytoremediation systems remove soil contaminants and compares their effectiveness. Phytoremediation uses plants to sta...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Agriculture and fore. 4 min read

Comparative Impacts of Agroforestry on Yield in Smallholder Farms...

This research investigates how integrating trees with crops and/or livestock (agroforestry) affects crop and total farm yield on smallholder holdings, compared ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Agricultural science. 2 min read

Comparative Analysis of Agricultural Science Education Across Rural and Urban School...

This research examines how Agricultural Science education differs between rural and urban schools, aiming to understand whether teaching materials, pedagogy, st...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Adult education. 3 min read

Comparative Analysis of Digital Literacy in Adult Education Programs across Countrie...

This research examines how adults learn digital skills through formal and informal programs in different countries, comparing curricula, delivery methods, and l...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Zoology. 2 min read

Comparative Vocalization Ecology Across Ant-Symbiotic Birds and Relatives...

This research investigates how birds that live in close association with ants use vocalizations, and how their calls compare with related species that do not ha...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Veterinary Medicine. 4 min read

Comparative Seroprevalence of Antibodies in Canine and Feline Populations...

This study examines how common antibodies are in dogs and cats and what this reveals about exposure to infectious agents and vaccination patterns across species...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Urban and Regional P. 4 min read

Comparative Analysis of Transit-Oriented Development Impacts in Global Cities...

Transit-Oriented Development TOD is about shaping cities so that high-density, mixed-use neighborhoods cluster around well-connected public transport hubs, enco...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
WhatsApp Click here to chat with us