A Framework for Integrating One Health in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: One Health and Antimicrobial Stewardship Intersections
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Veterinary Medicine’s Role in AMR Ecology
- 2.3Conceptual Review: Human Health Systems and AMR Policy Interfaces
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: One Health Borrows and Integrates Systems Thinking
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: Collective Impact Theory in Health Governance
- 2.6Theoretical Framework: Transactional Sex? No; Stakeholder Theory in Public Health
- 2.7Empirical Review: Global AMR Stewardship Initiatives and Outcomes
- 2.8Empirical Review: One Health Implementation in Veterinary Settings
- 2.9Empirical Review: Cross-Sector Surveillance for AMR
- 2.10Empirical Review: Governance and Policy Instruments for AMR
- 2.11Empirical Review: Education, Communication and Behavior Change in AMS
- 2.12Gaps in the Literature: Insufficient Integration Frameworks across Sectors
- 2.13Conceptual Model: Synthesis of One Health-AMS Interactions
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Model-Driven Framework Development and Validation
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Critical Realism in Health Systems Research
- 3.3Population of the Study: Stakeholders in Animal Health, Human Health, and Environment
- 3.4Sampling Frame and Technique: Purposive and Snowball Sampling for Multisector Stakeholders
- 3.5Sample Size Determination: Justified for Qualitative and Quantitative Components
- 3.6Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Surveys, Interviews, Policy Documents, and Field Observations
- 3.7Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Content, Construct, and Triangulation Strategies
- 3.8Data Collection Procedures: Protocols for Cross-Sector Data Gathering
- 3.9Data Analysis Methods: Thematic Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling
- 3.10Model Specification or Analytical Framework: The One Health-AMS Integration Framework
- 3.11Ethical Considerations: Approvals, Consent, and Data Privacy
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Participant Demographics and Contextual Settings
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Stakeholder Perceptions of One Health in AMS
- 4.3Validity Checks and Data Triangulation Outcomes
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Multisector Relationships and Framework Viability
- 4.5Model Evaluation: Fit, Feasibility, and Adaptability Across Contexts
- 4.6Interpretation of Results: How Findings Inform the Framework
- 4.7Discussion of Findings in Relation to Conceptual Review
- 4.8Implications for Policy and Practice in Veterinary Medicine and AMR Control
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion: Efficacy of a One Health-Integrated AMS Framework
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Theoretical and Practical Advances
- 5.4Recommendations for Policy, Practice, and Education
- 5.5Recommendations for Implementation and Monitoring
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
This study investigates how a One Health framework can be operationalized within antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to optimize antimicrobial use across human, animal, and environmental sectors. The problem addressed is the persistent fragmentation between sectors that undermines stewardship efficacy, enabling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) progression. The aim is to develop and validate a comprehensive integrative framework that aligns governance, surveillance, and practice across sectors to enhance ASP performance. Specific objectives include (1) mapping current ASP architectures across human and veterinary health and environmental interfaces; (2) identifying determinants that facilitate or hinder cross-sector collaboration; (3) developing a theoretically grounded framework that specifies roles, processes, and indicators for One Health–oriented ASP implementation; (4) testing the framework's predictive validity against AMR trends and antibiotic use metrics; and (5) generating actionable recommendations for policy and practice. A mixed-methods design is employed, combining qualitative and quantitative strands to ensure depth and generalizability. The qualitative component uses purposive sampling to select 40 stakeholders across tertiary hospitals, veterinary clinics, agricultural settings, and environmental monitoring programs in three metropolitan regions. In-depth interviews (n=30) and focus groups (n=10) are analyzed using thematic analysis underpinned by the Institutional Theory and the Social Ecological Model to identify governance mechanisms, communication pathways, and operational barriers. The quantitative component collects cross-sectional survey data from a broader sample of 300 clinicians, veterinarians, farm managers, and environmental health professionals, and aggregates antimicrobial usage and resistance indicators from 24 facilities over a 24-month period. Instrument validity and reliability are established through content validity indices, Cronbach’s alpha, and pilot testing. Data integration employs a convergent parallel design with joint display matrices to triangulate qualitative themes with quantitative indicators. Analytical techniques include thematic analysis for interview transcripts, descriptive statistics and cluster analysis to profile ASP maturity, multiple regression to assess predictors of cross-sector collaboration, and time-series analysis (ARIMA) on AMR and antibiotic consumption data to evaluate framework impact. The analytical model integrates components from the One Health Systems Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavioral (COM-B) model to define indicators of institutional readiness, stakeholder engagement, and behavioral change in prescribing and dispensing practices. Model specification entails specifying endogenous variables representing cross-sector communication quality, integrated surveillance capacity, and policy alignment, with exogenous controls for region, facility type, and baseline AMR prevalence. Ethical approvals are obtained from institutional review boards, with informed consent, data anonymization, and cross-sector data-sharing agreements strictly observed. Key expected findings include (i) a diagnostic map of existing silos and enablers across human, animal, and environmental health sectors; (ii) a set of core process indicators and governance mechanisms that reliably predict improved antimicrobial use and reduced AMR trajectories; (iii) a validated One Health ASP framework comprising governance structures, integrated surveillance protocols, joint education and training modules, and standardized data-sharing procedures; and (iv) demonstration of the framework’s explanatory power for observed variations in AMR trends across settings. The study anticipates identifying context-specific adaptations required for different regional ecologies and stakeholder configurations. Contribution to knowledge centers on providing a theoretically informed, practically implementable framework that bridges One Health theory and antimicrobial stewardship practice, enabling systematic cross-sector collaboration and harmonized surveillance. The research advances methodological approaches to framework development in transdisciplinary health, combining Institutional Theory, COM-B, and integrated time-series analytics within a robust mixed-methods design. The main conclusion expected is that an operationalized One Health framework substantially enhances ASP effectiveness by institutionalizing cross-sector governance, shared surveillance data, and coordinated intervention strategies. Recommendations include policy directives for mandatory intersectoral antimicrobial surveillance data sharing, capacity-building programs for joint stewardship education, development of interoperable information systems, and phased scale-up plans tailored to regional AMR profiles.
Thesis Overview
This research investigates how to harmonize human, animal, and environmental perspectives within antimicrobial stewardship programs to reduce misuses and resistance across sectors. It matters because antimicrobial resistance (AMR) spreads through interconnected pathways—humans, livestock, pets, wildlife, and the environment—yet many stewardship efforts operate in silos. The study addresses the knowledge gap on how a One Health approach can be practically designed, implemented, and evaluated within existing stewardship frameworks.
What the researcher will do
- Clarify concepts: Define One Health, antimicrobial stewardship, and the integration points across sectors; situate within current policy and practice.
- Review and synthesize relevant theories: Use systems thinking and the socio-ecological model to explain cross-sector interactions and behavior change.
- Design a mixed-methods study to develop and test a framework that links surveillance data, governance, and practice in human, veterinary, and environmental health contexts.
- Data collection plan:
- Qualitative: Conduct 25 to 30 semi-structured interviews with policymakers, veterinarians, physicians, microbiologists, and farmers; perform 8 focus groups with frontline staff; collect 20 document artifacts (policies, guidelines, reporting forms).
- Quantitative: Gather antimicrobial usage and resistance indicators from 10 mixed-use farms and 5 hospitals over 12 months; administer a survey to 200 stakeholders to assess attitudes, knowledge, and perceived barriers.
- Data analysis plan:
- Qualitative data: Thematic analysis guided by grounded theory to identify cross-sector themes; triangulate with document analysis.
- Quantitative data: Descriptive statistics, regression analyses to examine associations between stewardship practices and resistance indicators, and network analysis to map data flows and governance links.
- Model development: Build a practical One Health–oriented antimicrobial stewardship framework and validate it through expert panels and pilot testing.
Expected contribution
- A concrete, contextually adaptable framework that operationalizes One Health principles within antimicrobial stewardship, including governance structures, data integration pathways, and cross-sector decision-making tools.
- Evidence on how integrated surveillance, policy alignment, and stakeholder engagement influence stewardship outcomes.
Anticipated outcome
- Improved cross-sector collaboration, more effective reduction in inappropriate antimicrobial use, and better alignment of policies and practices across human, animal, and environmental health domains. Recommendations for policymakers, healthcare and veterinary professionals, and facility managers are provided to foster durable One Health stewardship.