The electoral process and national security in nigeria: a comparative study of the 2011 and 2015 elections
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Theoretical Framework
- 2.2Conceptual Framework
- 2.3Historical Overview
- 2.4Electoral Process in Nigeria
- 2.5National Security in Nigeria
- 2.6Relationship between Electoral Process and National Security
- 2.7Challenges in Electoral Process
- 2.8Impact of National Security on Electoral Process
- 2.9International Perspectives
- 2.10Comparative Analysis of 2011 and 2015 Elections
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Research Methodology
- 3.3Population and Sampling
- 3.4Data Collection Methods
- 3.5Data Analysis Techniques
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Limitations of Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data
- 4.3Comparison of 2011 Election Results
- 4.4Comparison of 2015 Election Results
- 4.5Impact on National Security
- 4.6Lessons Learned
- 4.7Policy Recommendations
- 4.8Future Research Directions
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Conclusion
- 5.2Summary of Research
- 5.3Implications of Findings
- 5.4Recommendations for Practice
- 5.5Recommendations for Further Study
Thesis Abstract
Abstract
The electoral process plays a crucial role in shaping the national security landscape of any country. This research conducts a comparative analysis of the 2011 and 2015 elections in Nigeria to examine the relationship between the electoral process and national security. By focusing on these two election cycles, the study aims to identify key differences and similarities in how the electoral process influenced national security dynamics in Nigeria. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research combines quantitative data analysis with qualitative case studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the electoral process on national security. The quantitative analysis involves statistical examination of election-related violence, security incidents, and their implications for overall national security during the 2011 and 2015 elections. This data is supplemented with qualitative insights gathered through interviews with key stakeholders, including government officials, security personnel, election observers, and civil society representatives. The findings of this study reveal significant variations in the patterns of election-related violence and their implications for national security between the 2011 and 2015 elections. While both election cycles experienced challenges such as voter intimidation, electoral fraud, and violence, the nature and extent of these incidents differed. The 2011 elections were characterized by widespread violence, particularly in the northern regions of Nigeria, which had significant implications for national security, including inter-communal conflicts and insurgent activities. In contrast, the 2015 elections witnessed a more coordinated security response, leading to a reduction in election-related violence and overall improvement in national security conditions. Through a comparative analysis of the 2011 and 2015 elections, this research underscores the importance of effective security measures in safeguarding the electoral process and promoting national security. The study highlights the need for proactive security strategies, early warning mechanisms, and stakeholder cooperation to mitigate election-related violence and its potential impact on national security. By shedding light on the nexus between the electoral process and national security, this research contributes to the growing body of literature on elections, security, and governance in Nigeria.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong><br><strong>1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY</strong></p><p>Election is an integral part of a democratic process that enables the citizenry determine fairly and freely who should lead them at every level of government periodically and take decisions that shape their socio-economic and political destiny; and in case they falter, still possess the power to recall them or vote them out in the next election. This was Obakhedo, (2011) aptly defined election thus: Election is a major instrument for the recruitment of political leadership in democratic societies; the key to participation in a democracy; and the way of giving consent to government (Dye, 2001); and allowing the governed to choose and pass judgment on office holders who theoretically represent the governed Obakhedo, (2011).</p><p>In its strictest sense, there can never be a democracy without election. Huntington is however quick to point out that, a political system is democratic ‘to the extent that its most powerful collective decision-makers are selected through fair, honest and periodic elections in which candidates freely compete for votes, and in which virtually all the adult population is eligible to vote’ (Huntington, 1991). In its proper sense, election is a process of selecting the officers or representatives of an organization or group by the vote of its qualified members (Nwolise, 2007). Anifowose (2003) defined elections as the process of elite selection by the mass of the population in any given political system, Bamgbose (2012).</p><p>Elections provide the medium by which the different interest groups within the bourgeois nation state can stake and resolve their claims to power through peaceful means (Iyayi, 2005). Elections therefore determine the rightful way of ensuring that responsible leaders take over the mantle of power. An election itself is a procedure by which the electorate, or part of it, choose the people who hold public office and exercise some degree of control over the elected officials. It is the process by which the people select and control their representatives. The implication of this is that without election, there can be no representative government.</p>
<br><p></p>