Integrated Surfactant-Polymer Flooding Design for Low-Permeability Reservoirs: Implementation and Evaluation
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Surfactant-Polymer Flooding in Low-Permeability Reservoirs
- 2.2Conceptual Review: Reservoir Characterization for Low-Permeability Systems
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Principles of Surfactant-Polymer Interactions in EOR
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Transport Phenomena in Polymer-Modified Fluids
- 2.5Theoretical Framework: Wettability Alteration and Interfacial Tension Reduction
- 2.6Empirical Review: Field-Scale Surfactant-Polymer Flood Projects in Tight Reservoirs
- 2.7Empirical Review: Laboratory Corefloods and Core-Scale Experiments
- 2.8Empirical Review: Polymer Retention, Adsorption and Compatibility in Low-Permeability Rocks
- 2.9Empirical Review: Surfactant Flood Design Parameters (Concentration, Salinity, pH)
- 2.10Empirical Review: Cost, Economic Viability and Lifecycle Assessment
- 2.11Identified Gaps in the Literature
- 2.12Conceptual Model: Integrated Surfactant-Polymer Flooding for Low-Permeability Reservoirs
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Framework
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism for Engineering Design Research
- 3.3Population of the Study: Representative Low-Permeability Reservoir Analogues
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique: Laboratory Cores, Fluids, and Field Analogues
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection: Laboratory Experiments, Field Data, and Modelling Tools
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments: Calibration, Replicates, and Sensitivity Analysis
- 3.7Data Analysis Methods: Descriptive Statistics, Regression, and Multivariate Analysis
- 3.8Model Specification: Governing Equations for Surfactant-Polymer Transport and Altered Mobility
- 3.9Evaluation Framework: Performance Metrics for Sweep Efficiency and Oil Recovery
- 3.10Ethical Considerations in Material Use and Data Reporting
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Coreflood Experimental Dataset and Field Analogues
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Fluid Properties, Rock Permeability, and Reservoir Conditions
- 4.3Hypotheses Testing: Effect of Polymer Viscosity on Sweep Efficiency
- 4.4Hypotheses Testing: Impact of Surfactant Concentration on Interfacial Tension Reduction
- 4.5Hypotheses Testing: Salinity and pH Optimization for Stability
- 4.6Model Validation: Transport and Adsorption Model Fitting
- 4.7Interpretation of Results: Mechanisms of Mobility Control in Low-Permeability Rocks
- 4.8Discussion in Relation to the Reviewed Literature
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Integrated SP Flooding
- 5.4Practical Recommendations for Field Implementation
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
This study investigates the design, implementation, and evaluation of an integrated surfactant-polymer (SP) flooding strategy for low-permeability reservoirs, addressing the persistent challenge of achieving economically viable oil recovery in tight formations where conventional waterfloods are inefficient and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) schemes often suffer from unfavorable transport and adsorption behaviors. The aim is to develop a robust SP protocol that optimizes chemical formulation, injection strategy, and reservoir management to maximize incremental oil recovery while maintaining injectivity and favorable flow assurance. Specific objectives are (1) to characterize rock-fluid interactions in representative low-permeability cores (pore throat diameters 0.1–0.5 ?m) and quantify adsorption, wettability alteration, and interfacial tension reduction under reservoir-relevant conditions; (2) to design a tailored SP formulation with optimized surfactant and polymer concentrations, salinity, and slug sizing using a design-of-experiments (DoE) framework; (3) to evaluate core-scale sweep efficiency, fractional-flow behavior, and end-point recovery through high-pressure coreflood experiments; (4) to develop a numerically implementable reservoir model incorporating SP transport, adsorption, and rheological effects for scale-up; and (5) to perform a field-credible techno-economic assessment of the proposed design under uncertainty.Under a positivist research paradigm, the methodology integrates experimental and numerical approaches. The population comprises core samples from tight sandstone and carbonate analogues with porosities of 8–14% and permeabilities in the millidarcy range. A stratified sampling approach will select 12 core plugs per lithology, with replicate measurements to ensure statistical rigor. Laboratory data will be collected from (a) static rock/fluid interaction tests, (b) dynamic coreflood experiments at reservoir-relevant temperatures (60–90°C) and downhole pressures, and (c) rheological characterization of SP slugs using a rotational viscometer across shear rates (0.1–1000 s-1). Data collection instruments include contact angle goniometry, zeta potential measurement, high-resolution CT scanning for pore-scale visualization, high-pressure decanting methods, and LC-MS/IC for chemical characterization of injected formulations. The SP formulations will be designed via a DoE matrix to identify optimal combinations of anionic/nonionic surfactants, partial hydrolyzed polyacrylamide or hydrolyzed polyacrylate polymers, salinity, and surfactant-to-polymer ratios, with slug sizes ranging from 0.2 to 0.6 pore volumes. Validity and reliability will be ensured through calibration runs, standard operating procedures, and replication. Data analysis will employ (i) multivariate regression and response-surface methodology to map performance surfaces, (ii) non-Newtonian rheology modeling to capture polymer solution behavior under reservoir temperatures, and (iii) a three-dimensional compositional reservoir simulator augmented with adsorption isotherms, interfacial tension reduction curves, and SP transport equations. Model validation will compare simulated production profiles with coreflood results and pressure transient analyses. Theoretical underpinnings will draw on capillary number optimization, wettability alteration theory, and adsorption-desorption kinetics, with references to the Theory of Phase Equilibria and the Surfactant-Polymer EOR framework. Expected findings include (a) quantitative relationships between SP formulation parameters and incremental oil recovery in tight rocks, (b) identification of slug sequences and injection schedules that maximize sweep efficiency while preserving injectivity, and (c) a validated upscaling methodology for translating core-scale results to field-scale performance. The study anticipates incremental recoveries between 8% and 20% of original oil in place (OOIP) for targeted low-permeability reservoirs, contingent on reservoir temperature and salinity constraints. The contribution to knowledge comprises a rigorously developed SP design protocol tailored to tight formations, an integrated coreflood-digital-twin workflow for rapid screening and optimization, and a transparent uncertainty quantification framework for field deployment. The main conclusion posits that a carefully engineered SP system, coupled with an optimized injection strategy and a validated reservoir model, can achieve meaningful recovery gains in low-permeability reservoirs without compromising injectivity. Recommendations include adopting adaptive DoE-guided SP formulation updates during field pilots, implementing real-time monitoring of surfactant and polymer concentrations in produced fluids, and further research into polymer aging and surfactant-polymer synergistic interactions under varying mineralogical conditions.
Thesis Overview
Integrated Surfactant-Polymer Flooding Design for Low-Permeability Reservoirs: Implementation and Evaluation
This research explores how to improve oil recovery from tight, low-permeability reservoirs by using a combined chemical flood that leverages surfactants to lower interfacial tension and polymers to improve fluid viscosity and mobility control. In such rocks, traditional waterflooding leaves substantial recoverable oil behind due to high capillary forces and unfavorable flow paths. The integrated approach aims to design a tailored chemical formulation and injection strategy that works effectively under the specific geochemical and geological conditions of low-permeability formations, then test its performance from lab to field-like conditions.
Why it matters: Low-permeability reservoirs account for a significant portion of global unconventional resources. Enhancing recovery from these plays can substantially extend field life and improve project economics. The research fills a knowledge gap on how to optimally combine surfactants and polymers for tight rocks, including how formulation, aging, salinity, and rock wettability affect performance.
What the researcher will do, step by step:
1. Define objectives and select representative low-permeability rock samples (0.01–1 Darcy) and formation brines to reflect realistic field conditions.
2. Develop a design of experiments to test multiple surfactant chemistries and polymer types/concentrations, focusing on oil-water interfacial tension reduction and viscosity-enhancement while evaluating adsorption and stability.
3. Conduct coreflood laboratory experiments under controlled temperature and reservoir-like pressure to measure oil recovery, pressure drop, and sweep efficiency.
4. Characterize rock-fluid interactions using contact angle measurements, zeta potential, and spectroscopy to understand wettability and adsorption behavior.
5. Analyze data with regression and response surface methodology to identify optimal formulations and operating windows; validate findings with sensitivity analyses.
6. Develop a scalable injection strategy and economic screening to assess field applicability.
Expected contribution and outcome: The study will provide a validated design framework for integrated surfactant-polymer flooding in low-permeability reservoirs, including recommended chemical formulations, concentrations, salinity tolerance, and injection schedules. It aims to advance practical guidelines for field implementation and offer a basis for comparative techno-economic assessments.
Potential limitations and use: Results will guide pilot testing, with emphasis on translating lab outcomes to field conditions and informing risk assessments related to chemical costs, compatibility, and reservoir heterogeneity.