Assessment of Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques in Mature Fields Using Reservoir Performance Data
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Framework of Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
- 2.2Theoretical Models Underpinning Reservoir Performance Evaluation
2.
- 2.1Darcy’s Law and Its Extensions
2.
- 2.2The Buckley-Leverett Theory
- 2.3Empirical Studies on EOR Effectiveness in Mature Fields
- 2.4Reservoir Performance Data and Its Role in EOR Assessment
- 2.5Technologies for Data Collection and Monitoring in Mature Fields
- 2.6Comparison of Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Recovery Methods
- 2.7Factors Influencing EOR Technique Selection
- 2.8Challenges and Limitations in EOR Implementation
- 2.9Gaps in Existing Literature on EOR Performance Assessment
- 2.10Conceptual Model for EOR Evaluation Using Reservoir Data
- 2.11Summary and Critical Analysis of the Literature Review
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design and Approach
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm Guiding the Study
- 3.3Population of the Study: Data Sources and Reservoirs
- 3.4Sample Size Determination and Sampling Technique
- 3.5Data Collection Instruments and Procedures
- 3.6Validation and Calibration of Data Collection Tools
- 3.7Methods of Data Processing and Analysis
- 3.8Analytical Framework: Model Specification for EOR Evaluation
- 3.9Ethical Considerations in Data Collection and Analysis
- 3.10Summary of Methodological Procedures
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
- 4.1Data Presentation and Descriptive Statistics
- 4.2Reservoir Performance Trends Under Different EOR Techniques
- 4.3Testing of Research Hypotheses
- 4.4Interpretation of Key Findings in Relation to Hypotheses
- 4.5Comparison with Existing Literature: Results and Discrepancies
- 4.6Discussion of EOR Effectiveness and Oil Recovery Enhancement
- 4.7Implications for Field Management and EOR Strategy
- 4.8Limitations of Data and Analytical Challenges
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Major Findings
- 5.2Conclusions Derived from the Study
- 5.3Contributions to Petroleum Engineering Knowledge
- 5.4Recommendations for EOR Practice and Policy
- 5.5Suggestions for Further Research
Thesis Abstract
The depletion of primary reservoir energy in mature oil fields necessitates the application of effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques to maximize hydrocarbon extraction and prolong field life. This study aims to systematically assess the performance and effectiveness of selected EOR methods—namely waterflooding, gas injection, and chemical EOR—within mature reservoirs by analyzing reservoir performance data. The specific objectives include quantifying the incremental recovery attributed to each EOR technique, identifying the reservoir characteristics influencing EOR success, and developing predictive models to optimize sequestration and recovery strategies. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study integrates quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights to holistically evaluate EOR performance across three mature fields with proven reservoir data spanning the past 15 years. The population comprises approximately 150 production wells with comprehensive historical data, from which a stratified random sampling technique selected 50 wells representing different reservoir zones, EOR techniques, and production histories. Data collection involved extracting detailed reservoir performance data—including pressure readings, injection rates, production volumes, water cut, and other relevant parameters—from company databases complemented by field logs and prior exploration reports. Data validity and reliability were ensured through calibration with field measurements and cross-verification with previous studies. The analytical framework centers on multiple regression analysis to identify the key factors influencing recovery efficiency, supported by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tests to compare the impacts of different EOR methods across reservoir zones. Additionally, time-series analysis was employed to evaluate trends in reservoir pressure and production rates pre- and post-EOR implementation. To develop predictive models, the study utilized machine learning techniques—specifically, random forest algorithms—integrated within the reservoir performance data to forecast long-term recovery trajectories under varying operational scenarios. The theoretical underpinning drew upon the theories of reservoir engineering—particularly Darcy’s Law for fluid flow and the Theory of Recovery Efficiency—and the Resource-Based View (RBV) to contextualize how reservoir characteristics influence technological deployment and success. Expected findings of this research are that specific reservoir attributes—such as porosity, permeability, and residual oil saturation—significantly correlate with the effectiveness of different EOR methods; for instance, waterflooding performs optimally in high-permeability zones, while chemical EOR shows higher incremental recovery in reservoirs with finer pore structures. The analysis is anticipated to reveal that gas injection schemes contribute substantially to pressure maintenance, thereby improving overall recovery factors by an average of 18%. Furthermore, the predictive models are expected to demonstrate high accuracy (above 85%) in simulating reservoir responses, enabling more targeted and economically viable EOR application strategies. This study contributes valuable empirical evidence to the body of knowledge on EOR optimization, providing a comparative assessment of techniques tailored to reservoir heterogeneity. Its innovative integration of advanced statistical and machine learning approaches offers a significant methodological contribution for reservoir management. Additionally, the development of a decision-support framework based on reservoir parameters and performance history bridges the gap between theoretical models and practical operations. The main conclusion underscores the importance of reservoir-specific EOR selection based on robust data analytics; chemical EOR and polymer flooding emerge as promising options for reservoirs with moderate porosity but low permeability, whereas waterflooding remains effective in highly permeable zones. Recommendations include adopting a data-driven EOR planning framework, enhancing reservoir monitoring systems, and conducting further research into hybrid EOR methods that combine chemical and gas techniques. The study advocates for integrating reservoir performance data analytics into routine reservoir management to improve recovery outcomes, reduce costs, and extend the productive lifespan of mature oil fields. Future investigations should explore real-time data integration and the application of advanced AI techniques for dynamic reservoir simulation, thereby advancing innovative and sustainable extraction practices in mature fields.
Thesis Overview
This research focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of various enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in mature oil fields by analyzing reservoir performance data. Mature fields are those that have been producing oil for many years and have already experienced primary and secondary recovery methods. Over time, these fields often produce less oil, making it necessary to explore additional techniques, such as chemical injection, thermal methods, or gas injection, to maximize remaining reserves. The goal is to determine which EOR techniques deliver the best results in specific conditions, helping reduce waste and improve field profitability.
The study addresses a gap in existing knowledge because although many EOR methods are known, their performance varies widely depending on reservoir characteristics. There is a need for a systematic way to compare the success of these techniques based on actual production and reservoir data, rather than just laboratory or pilot-test results.
The research will involve collecting reservoir performance data from selected mature fields, including production rates, pressure histories, fluid compositions, and injection data. The sample will include at least three mature fields with different geological settings. Data analysis will involve statistical techniques such as regression analysis and ANOVA to identify patterns and correlations between EOR implementation and production outcomes. The researcher will also review historical field data to understand changes over time and perform comparative analysis to evaluate the relative success of various EOR methods.
The expected contribution of this research is to generate practical insights into the most effective EOR techniques under different reservoir conditions, helping industry professionals make better-informed decisions. It will also fill a gap in the literature by providing empirical data-driven evaluations rather than solely theoretical or experimental studies.
Ultimately, the study aims to identify the key factors influencing EOR success, recommend the most suitable techniques for specific types of mature fields, and suggest best practices for future recovery efforts. The findings are expected to help optimize oil recovery, extend the lifespan of mature reservoirs, and improve the economic viability of oil production in mature fields.