The mountain pass theorem and applications. | Blazingprojects Postgraduate Thesis
Home / Mathematics / The mountain pass theorem and applications.

The mountain pass theorem and applications.

 

Table Of Contents


  • Epigraph ii Dedication iii Preface iv Acknowledgement v Introduction 1 1 Dierentiability in Banach Spaces 6
  • 1.1Gâteaux Derivative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
  • 1.2Fréchet Dierentiability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
  • 1.3Second order derivative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2 Nemytskii Operators 20
  • 2.1Denition of a Nemytskii Operator . . . . . . . . . . 20
  • 2.2Carathéodory condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
  • 2.3Continuity and Dierentiability of Nemytskii Operator 23 3 Variational Principles and Minimization 28
  • 3.1Lower Semicontinuous Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
  • 3.2Ekeland Theorem in Complete metric space . . . . . 31
  • 3.3PalaisSmale Conditions and Minimization . . . . . . 35
  • 3.4Deformation Theorem and Palais-Smale Conditon . . 37
  • 3.5Mountain-Pass Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4 Application: The lane Emden Equation 44 vi Bibliography 54

Thesis Abstract

The mountain pass theorem is a fundamental result in the theory of nonlinear analysis and optimization. It provides a powerful tool for studying the existence of critical points for variational problems, particularly in the context of minimization of functionals defined on infinite-dimensional spaces. The theorem is named after the mountain pass, a path that crosses a mountain range, illustrating the idea that a solution to a variational problem may not lie at the lowest point but rather at a certain intermediate level. In its classical form, the mountain pass theorem establishes conditions under which a continuous functional defined on a Banach space possesses a critical point that is a local minimum. The key idea is to construct a path connecting two distinct critical points of the functional, with the path passing through a specific "mountain pass" point where the functional value is higher than at the critical points. By carefully analyzing the properties of this path and the behavior of the functional along it, one can infer the existence of a critical point corresponding to a local minimum. The applications of the mountain pass theorem are diverse and extend to various fields of mathematics and physics. In the context of partial differential equations, the theorem has been used to establish the existence of solutions for boundary value problems and to study the behavior of nonlinear elliptic equations. In the theory of nonlinear waves, the theorem plays a crucial role in proving the existence of solitary wave solutions and understanding their stability properties. Moreover, the mountain pass theorem has applications in mathematical physics, such as in the study of stationary solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations and in the analysis of vortices in superconductors. In mathematical biology, the theorem has been employed to investigate pattern formation in reaction-diffusion systems and to study the dynamics of population models with nonlinear interactions. Overall, the mountain pass theorem represents a powerful and versatile tool for exploring the existence of critical points in variational problems. Its applications span various branches of mathematics and have led to significant advancements in our understanding of nonlinear phenomena. By providing a systematic framework for identifying critical points that may not be global minima, the theorem has opened up new avenues for research and has enriched the theory of nonlinear analysis.

Thesis Overview

<p> </p><p>Dierentiability in Banach Spaces<br>We will dene here two types of dierentiability in Banach spaces<br>as generalizations of the concept of dierentiability in R.<br>1.1 Gâteaux Derivative<br>Let us denote by B(X; Y ) the space of all bounded linear maps from<br>X to Y where X; Y are Banach spaces.<br>Recall that a bounded linear map means a continuous linear map.<br>Denition1.1<br>Let f : U 7! Y be a mapping and x 2 U ; where U X open. We<br>say that f is Gâteaux dierentiable at xo if there exists A 2 B(X; Y ),<br>such that<br>8 h 2 X n f0g, the map t 7! f(x0+th)ô€€€f(x0)<br>t has a limit as t ! 0<br>equal to A(h); that is,<br>lim<br>t!0<br>f(x0 + th) ô€€€ f(x0)<br>t<br>= A(h) (1:2)<br>or equivalently<br>f(x0 + th) ô€€€ f(x0) = tA(h) + o(t) 8 h 2 X<br>where o(t) holds for the remainder r(t) = f(x0+th)ô€€€f(x0)ô€€€tA(h)<br>6<br>satisfying<br>lim<br>t!0<br>kr(t)k<br>t<br>= 0 :<br>For simplicity we will write Ah instead of A(h):<br>Ah is called the Gâteaux derivative of f at x0 in the direction of<br>h denoted @f<br>@h (x0).<br>The bounded linear operator A, depending on x0, is denoted by<br>DGf(xo) or f0G<br>(xo) and called the Gâteaux dierential.<br>Remarks.<br>– In Denition 1.1, one can simply require that t ! 0+.<br>– Whenever h 6= 0 and the ratio f(x0+th)ô€€€f(x0)<br>t has a limit in Y as<br>t ! 0, we say that f is dierentiable in the direction of h at xo,<br>and we call lim<br>t!0<br>f(x0 + th) ô€€€ f(x0)<br>t<br>the directional dérivative of<br>f at xo in the direction h.<br>Example 1.1:<br>The function f : R2 7! R dened by<br>f(x; y) = x2 + y2<br>is Gateaux dierentiable at every point (x0; y0) 2 R2.<br>Indeed: Let u0 = (x0; y0) and h = (h1; h2). Then<br>f(u0 + th) ô€€€ f(u0) = 2t(x0h1 + y0h2) + t2(h21<br>+ h22<br>); 8t 2 R:<br>It follows that<br>lim<br>t!0<br>f(u0 + th) ô€€€ f(u0)<br>t<br>= 2(x0h1 + y0h2) = 2hu0; hi<br>et since the map h 7! 2hu0; hi is linear and continuous from R2<br>to R, we conclude that f is Gâteaux dierentiable and<br>DGf(u0)(h) = 2hu0; hi 8 hR2:<br>Moreover by regarding R2 as a euclidean space, we can derive the<br>gradient of f at uo as<br>rf(uo) = 2uo :<br>which is actually linear and bounded with respect to h as the inner<br>product( since RN is an inner product space).<br>7<br>Theorem 1.1: (Euler necessary condition for extrema)<br>Let X and Y be real Banach spaces, f : U 7! Y be a mapping and<br>x 2 U where U X is open. If f is Gâteaux dierentiable at an extremum<br>point x0 (maximum or minimum point), then DGf(x0) = 0<br>Proof : Under the hypothesis of this theorem, suppose without loss<br>of generality that x0 is a minimum point (otherwise consider the<br>function ô€€€f instead of f).<br>Since xo 2 U and U is open, there exists a positive real number<br>r such that the open ball Br(xo) is contained in U. Now let<br>h 2 X n f0g. Then for every t such that jtj &lt; r=jjhjj, we have,<br>f(xo + th) f(xo) and so by the Gâteaux dierentiability of f at<br>xo, we have<br>DGf(xo)(h) = lim<br>t!0+<br>f(u0 + th) ô€€€ f(u0)<br>t<br>0<br>It also follows that DGf(xo)(ô€€€h) 0, i.e. DGf(xo)(h) 0 by linearity<br>of DGf(xo). Therefore DGf(xo)(h) = 0 for all h 2 X indeed.<br>Thus DGf(xo) = 0.<br>Theorem 1.2: (Mean Value Theorem in Banach Spaces)<br>Let X and Y be Banach spaces, U X be open and let f : U ! Y<br>be Gâteaux dierentiable. Then for all x1 x2 2 X, we have<br>kf(x1) ô€€€ f(x2)k sup<br>t2[0;1]<br>kDGf(x1 + t(x2 ô€€€ x1)k kx1 ô€€€ x2k<br>provided that the sup<br>t2[0;1]<br>kDGf(x1 + t(x2 ô€€€ x1)k is nite.<br>Proof. Suppose that the assumptions of Theorem 1.2 hold. Let<br>g 2 Y (the dual of Y ) such that jjgjj 1. Then the real-valued<br>function ‘ : [0; 1] ô€€€! R dened by<br>‘(t) = g f(x1 + th) where h = x2 ô€€€ x1<br>is dierentiable on [0; 1 in the usual sense. Moreover we see that<br>‘0(t) = gô€€€<br>DGf(x1 + th)(h)</p><p>; 8 t 2 (0; 1) :<br>It follows from the classical mean valued theorem that<br>j'(1) ô€€€ ‘(0)j sup<br>0j’0(t)j ;<br>that is<br>kg f(x1) ô€€€ g f(x2)k sup<br>0j’0(t)j :<br>8<br>Moreover for all t 2 (0; 1), we have<br>j’0(t)j =</p><p>g<br>ô€€€<br>DGf(x1 + th)(h)</p><p>jjgjj kDGf(x1 + th)k khk<br>kDGf(x1 + th)k khk:<br>And so<br>kgô€€€<br>f(x1)ô€€€f(x2)</p><p>k = kgof(x1)ô€€€gf(x2)kj</p><p>sup<br>0kDGf(x1 + th)k</p><p>khk :<br>But it is well known as a consequence of the Hahn-Banach theorem<br>that<br>kyk = supfu(y) ; u 2 Y ; kuk 1 g:<br>Therefore we nally have<br>kf(x1) ô€€€ f(x2)k sup<br>t2[0;1]<br>kDGf(x1 + t(x2 ô€€€ x1)k kx1 ô€€€ x2k :<br>Remark. If f satises the assumptions of Theorem 1.2 and has a<br>continuous Gâteaux dierential, then one can prove the conclusion<br>of Theorem 1.2 by using the notion of Riemann integration in Banach<br>spaces following the next lemma.<br>Lemma. (Cf. ) Let X be a Banach space and ‘ : [a; b] ! X<br>be continuous, where ô€€€1 &lt; a &lt; b &lt; +1. Then the sequence of<br>partial sums<br>b ô€€€ a<br>n<br>Xnô€€€1<br>k=0<br>‘</p><p>a + k<br>b ô€€€ a<br>n</p><p>converges as n ! 1;<br>and its limit is called the Riemann integral of f over [a; b] and is<br>denoted by Z b<br>a<br>‘(t) dt :<br>That is<br>Z b<br>a<br>‘(t)dt = lim<br>n!1<br>b ô€€€ a<br>n<br>Xnô€€€1<br>k=0<br>‘</p><p>a + k<br>b ô€€€ a<br>n</p><p>:<br>It is easily seen that</p><p>Z b<br>a<br>‘(t) dt</p><p>Z b<br>a<br>k'(t)k dt:<br>9<br>Furthermore if ‘ is continuously (Gâteaux) diérentiable on [a; b] ,<br>then<br>‘(b) = ‘(a) +<br>Z b<br>a<br>‘0(t) dt :<br>Whenener the convergence in (1.2) is uniform for h, there arises<br>an interesting stronger type of dierentiability called the Fréchet<br>dierentiability.<br>1.2 Fréchet Dierentiability<br>It is a rened notion dierentiabilty of which concept is implicitly<br>closer to that of the standard notion of dierentiability known in R<br>Recall: A function f : R ô€€€! R is said to be dierentiable at<br>x0 2 R if and only if the mapping dened on R n f0g as<br>h 7!<br>f(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0)<br>h<br>has a limit a 2 R as h ! 0; that is,<br>lim<br>h!0<br>f(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0)<br>h<br>= a 2 R:<br>Obeserve that this condition is equivalent to the existence of a real<br>number a 2 R such that<br>f(x0 + h) = f(x0) + ah + o(h) :<br>Now, how can we extend this notion to operators dened between<br>Banach spaces? The answer is in the following denition.<br>Denition 1.2:<br>A function f : U ô€€€! Y ; where Xand Y are Banach spaces and U<br>open in X, is said to be Fréchet dierentiable at a point x0 2 U, if<br>there exists a bounded linear map A : X ! Y such that:<br>lim<br>khk!0<br>kf(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0) ô€€€ Ahk<br>khk<br>= 0 ; (1:1)<br>or equivalently<br>f(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0) = Ah + o(khk) ; (1:2)<br>10<br>where<br>r(h) := f(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0) ô€€€ Ah = o(h)<br>in the sense that<br>lim<br>khk!0<br>kr(h)k<br>khk<br>= 0 :<br>Such an operator A is unique and called the Fréchet dierential<br>of f at x0 and is denoted by Df(x0) or f0(x0) (somtimes it is also<br>denoted by df(xo)).<br>The function f is said to be Fréchet dierentiable (or simply differentiable)<br>on U, if it is Fréchet dierentiable at every point of U:<br>When there is no ambiguity about the domain of f, we just say that<br>f is dierentiable.<br>Denition 1.3:<br>Let X and Y be Banach spaces, U open in X and let f : U ! Y<br>be Fréchet dierentiable on U. The Fréchet dierential of f on U is<br>the mapping<br>Df : U ! B(X; Y )<br>x 7! Df(x) :<br>We say that f is continuously dierentiable on U or a mapping of<br>class C1 (or simply a C1-mapping) if Df is continuous as a mapping<br>from U into B(X; Y ).<br>Examples (Fréchet dierentiable functions).<br>Let H be a real Hilbert space. Then the function F : H ô€€€! R<br>dened by<br>F(x) =<br>1<br>2<br>kxk2<br>is Fréchet dierentiable on H and its Fréchet dierential is dened<br>by:<br>DF(x)(h) = hx; hi = hh; xi:<br>Thanks to the Riesz representation we can write<br>rF(x) = x :<br>11<br>Indeed let us x xo 2 H arbitrarily. Then for every h 2 H, we have<br>F(xo + h) ô€€€ F(xo) = 1<br>2 (kxo + hk2 ô€€€ kxok2)<br>= 1<br>2 (hxo + h; xo + hi ô€€€ hxo; xoi)<br>= 1<br>2 (hxo; xoi + 2hxo; hi + hh; hi ô€€€ hxo; xoi)<br>= hxo; hi + hh;hi<br>2<br>= hh; xoi + jjhjj2<br>2 :<br>Now dene the operator A : H ! H by A(h) = hh; xoi. Then<br>A is linear (since the real inner product is bilinear) and bounded<br>(according to Cauchy-Schwarz inequality). Moreover it is clear that<br>lim<br>khk!0<br>kF(x0 + h) ô€€€ F(x0) ô€€€ A(h)k<br>khk<br>= lim<br>khk!0<br>khk=2 = 0 :<br>Next we present some properties of the Fréchet dierential.<br>Proposition 1.1: Let X and Y be Banach spaces and U X<br>open.<br>1. If F : U ! Y is Fréchet dierentiable at some point x0 2 U,<br>then F is continuous at x0.<br>2. If F : U ! Y is Fréchet dierentiable according to a norm in<br>X,<br>then it is also Fréchet dierentiable according to any norm<br>equivalent to the rst norm.<br>3. (linéarity)<br>If F;G : U ! Y are Fréchet dierentiable at some point xo 2<br>U,<br>then for any a; b 2 R, aF + bG is Fréchet dierentiable at xo<br>and<br>D(aF + bG)(xo) = aDF(xo) + bDG(xo) :<br>4. (Chain rule).<br>Let also V be an open set of a Banach space Z and consider<br>two mappings F : U ô€€€! Y and G : V ô€€€! Z such that<br>F(U) V . If F is Frechet dierentiable at some point xo 2 U<br>12<br>and G : V ô€€€! Z is Frechet dierentiable at yo = F(xo) 2 V ,<br>then G F is Fréchet dierentiable at xo and<br>D(G F)(xo) = DG(yo) DF(xo) :<br>Proof:<br>1. Suppose that f is Fréchet dierentiable at x0 2 U. Then there<br>exists a bounded linear map A : X ! Y such that:<br>f(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0) = Ah + o(khk) :<br>It follows from the continuity of A and the denition of o(h)<br>that<br>lim<br>jjhjj!0<br>jjf(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0)jj = 0 ;<br>that is<br>lim<br>h!0<br>ô€€€<br>f(x0 + h) ô€€€ f(x0)</p><p>= 0 in Y<br>or simply lim<br>h!0<br>f(x0 + h) = f(x0).<br>2. Let k:k1 and k:k2 be two equivalent norm in X. Then there<br>exist constant &gt; 0 and &gt; 0 such that<br>kxk1 kxk2 kxk1 ; 8 x 2 X :<br>There a mapping g is dened from an open neighbourhood of<br>0 in (X; k:k1) into Y if and only if is dened from an open<br>neighbourhood of 0 in (X; k:k2) into Y . Moreover for any h 6= 0<br>in the domain of g, we have<br>kg(h)k<br>khk1</p><p>kg(h)k<br>khk2</p><p>kg(h)k<br>khk1</p><p>kg(h)k<br>khk2<br>which implies that<br>lim<br>khk1!0<br>kg(h)k<br>khk1<br>= 0 () lim<br>khk2!0<br>kg(h)k<br>khk2<br>= 0 :<br>3. Let ” &gt; 0. Then by the Fréchet dierentiability of the two<br>functions F and G at xo 2 U, we get (indeed) the existence of<br>&gt; 0 such that for every h 2 X satisfying jjhjj &lt; , we have<br>kF(xo + h) ô€€€ F(xo) ô€€€ DF(xo)(h)k<br>”<br>2(jaj + 1)<br>khk<br>13<br>and<br>kG(xo + h) ô€€€ G(xo) ô€€€ DG(xo)(h)k<br>”<br>2(jbj + 1)<br>khk :<br>Thus we have<br>k(aF+bG)(xo+h)ô€€€(aF+bG)(xo)ô€€€aDF(x)(h)ô€€€bDG(x)(h)k “jjhjj :<br>4. We know that<br>F(xo + h) ô€€€ F(xo) = DF(xo)(h) + o(h) (i)<br>and<br>G(yo + h) ô€€€ G(yo) = DG(yo)(h) + o(h) (ii):<br>Therefore<br>G F)(xo + h) ô€€€ (G F)(xo) = G(F(xo + h)) ô€€€ G(F(xo))<br>= G<br>ô€€€<br>F(xo) + DF(xo)(h) + o(khk)</p><p>ô€€€ G(F(xo))<br>= G(F(xo)) + DG(yo)((DF(xo)(h) + o(h) ô€€€ G(F(xo= DG(yo)DF(xo)(h) + DG(yo)(o(h))<br>= DG(yo)DF(xo)(h) + ~o(h)<br>which gives the result since DG(yo)DF(xo) is a bounded linear<br>map and<br>jj~o(h)jj jjDG(yo)jj jjo(h)jj:<br>Theorem 1.3:<br>Every Fréchet dierentiable function is Gâteaux dierentiable and<br>the dierentials coincide..<br>Proof : Let f : U ô€€€! Y ; where Xand Y are Banach spaces and U<br>open in X, be Fréchet dierentiable at a point x0 2 U. We show<br>that f is Gâteaux dierentiable at xo. Fix any v 2 X n f0g. Then<br>we have f0(xo) 2 B(X; Y ) and<br>lim<br>t!0+</p><p>f(xo+tv)ô€€€f(xo)<br>t ô€€€ f0(xo)(v)</p><p>= lim<br>t!0+<br>jjvjj f(xo+tv)ô€€€f(xo)ô€€€f0(xo)(tv)<br>jjtvjj<br>= lim<br>khk!0<br>jjvjj f(xo+h)ô€€€f(xo)ô€€€f0(xo)(h)<br>jjhjj<br>= 0 :<br>Therefore f is Gâteaux dierentiable at xo and moreover DGf(xo) =<br>f0(xo).<br>14<br>Remark: The converse of Theorem 1.2 is false as it can be seen<br>by the example below.<br>Example 1.2 :<br>The function g : R2 ô€€€! R dened by<br>g(x; y) =<br>8&gt;&lt;<br>&gt;:</p><p>x2y<br>x4+y2<br>4<br>if y 6= 0 ;<br>0 if y = 0<br>is Gâteaux dierentiable at (0; 0) but not Fréchet dierentiable at<br>this point.<br>Indeed, let h = (h1; h2) 2 R2. Then for t &gt; 0, we have<br>g(th) ô€€€ g(0; 0)<br>t<br>=<br>8&lt;<br>:<br>t4h41<br>h22<br>(t2h41<br>+h22<br>)4 if h2 6= 0 ;<br>0 if h2 = 0 ;<br>and so<br>lim<br>t!0+<br>g(th) ô€€€ g(0; 0)<br>t<br>= 0 ;<br>yielding the Gâteaux dierentiability of g at (0; 0) with g0(0; 0) 0.<br>But it is seen that g is not Fréchet dierentiable at (0; 0), according<br>to Theorem 1.3, by considering the perturbations H = (h1; h21<br>) as<br>follows :<br>lim<br>h1ô€€€!0+<br>g(h1; h21<br>) ô€€€ g(0; 0)<br>k(h1; h21<br>)k<br>=<br>1<br>16<br>6= 0 :<br>The next theorem gives a useful sucient condition under which<br>Gâteaux dierentiability implies Fréchet dierrentiability.<br>Theorem 1.4:<br>Let X and Y be Banach spaces, U open and nonempty in X and<br>let f : U ! Y . If f has a continuous Gâteaux dierential, then f<br>is Fréchet dierentiable and f 2 C1(U;R).<br>Proof :<br>Let x 2 U and choose &gt; 0 such that B(x; ) U. Let h 2 X such<br>that jjhjj &lt; . Consider the function ‘ : [0; 1] ô€€€! R dened by :<br>‘(t) = f(x + th) ô€€€ f(x) ô€€€ tDGf(x)(h)<br>Since f is Gâteaux dierentiable, it follows that ‘ is dierentiable<br>and<br>‘0(t) = DGf(x + th)(h) ô€€€ DGf(x)(h) :<br>15<br>By applying the Mean Value Theorem to ‘ we have :<br>j'(1) ô€€€ ‘(0)j sup<br>0j’0(t)j ;<br>that is,<br>kf(x + h) ô€€€ f(x) ô€€€ DGf(x)(h)k sup<br>t2(0;1)<br>kDGf(x + th)(h) ô€€€ DGF(x)(h)k<br>sup<br>t2(0;1)<br>kDGf(x + th) ô€€€ DGF(x)k khk:<br>By continuity of the mapping Df : U ! B(X; Y ), we have<br>lim<br>h!0</p><p>sup<br>t2(0;1)<br>kDGf(x + th) ô€€€ DGf(x)k<br>!<br>= 0 ;<br>and so<br>f(x + h) ô€€€ f(x) ô€€€ DGf(x)(h) = o(h)<br>with Df(x) 2 B(X; Y ).<br>Denition 1.2:<br>Let H be a Hilbert space equipped with inner product h:; :i and<br>f : X ô€€€! R be Fréchet dierentiable. Then the mapping<br>rf : H ô€€€! H<br>x 7! rf(x) ;<br>(where rf(x) is the gradient of f at x) is called a potential operator<br>with a potential f : H ô€€€! R.<br>1.3 Second order derivative<br>Let X and Y be real Banach spaces, U open and nonempty in X,<br>and let f : U ! Y be dierentiable. If<br>f0 : U ô€€€! B(X; Y )<br>is dierentiable, then for every x 2 U,<br>(f0)0(x) 2 L(X; B(X; Y ))<br>and is simply denoted by f00(x) or D2f(x). In this case we say that<br>f is twice dierentiable at x and f00(x) is called the second order<br>16<br>dierential of f at x.<br>Observe that in fact<br>f00(x) : X X ô€€€! Y<br>is bilinear and bounded (i.e., continuous) .<br>We recall that a mapping : X X ô€€€! Y is a bounded bilinear<br>map if:<br>1. 8 (x1; x2) 2 X X, 8 y 2 X and 8 ; 2 R,<br>(x1 + x2; y) = (x1; y) + (x2; y)<br>(y; x1 + x2) = (y; x1) + (y; x2)<br>2. 9K 2 (0; 1) such that<br>k(x1: x2)kY Kkx1kXkx2kX :<br>The norm of such a bounded bilinear map is given by:<br>kk = sup fk(x1; x2)kY ; kx1kX 1 and kx2k 1g<br>Note that, more generally, if E1, E2 and E3 are given three normed<br>linear spaces, we can dene a bounded linear map from E1E2 into<br>E3.<br>The space of bounded bilinear maps from X X into Y is isometric<br>to B(X; B(X; Y )). Indeed the map<br>j : B(X2; Y )) ô€€€! B(X; B(X; Y ))<br>A 7! j(A)<br>where j(A) is such that for all x 2 X and for all y 2 Y ,<br>ô€€€<br>j(A)(x)</p><p>(y) = A(x; y) :<br>Moreover jjj(A)jj = jjAjj.<br>Going back to the setting of the denition of the second order<br>dierential, if f : U ! Y is twice dierentiable, then f0 : U !<br>B(X2; Y )). And if f00 is continuous, we say that f is of class C2<br>and we write f 2 C2(U; Y ).<br>17<br>Furthermore we have the following Taylor formula for x 2 U and h<br>suciently small :<br>f(x + h) = f(x) + f0(x)(h) +<br>1<br>2<br>f00(x)(h; h) + o<br>ô€€€<br>khk2<br>X</p><p>(1:5)<br>that can be established by using a notion of Riemann integration in<br>Y such as<br>f(x + h) = f(x) + f0(x)(h) +<br>Z 1<br>0<br>(1 ô€€€ t)f00(x + th)(h; h) dt :<br>These Taylor expansions give the simplest sucient conditions<br>on a critical a C2 functional to be a local extrema.<br>Proposition 1.4<br>Let X and Y be Banach spaces, U open in X and let f : U ! Y<br>be twice continuously dierentiable. Suppose that xo is a critical<br>point of f.<br>1. If there exists a positive real number such that<br>D2f(xo)(h; h) jjhjj2 ; 8 h 2 X ;<br>Then xo is a local minimum point of f.<br>2. If for every x in a neighbourhood of xo, D2f(x) is positive<br>semidenite (in the sense that<br>D2f(x)(h; h) 0 ; 8 h 2 X );<br>then xo is a local minimum point of f over U.<br>3. If U is convex and for every x 2 U, D2f(x) is positive semidefinite<br>(in the sense that<br>D2f(x)(h; h) 0 ; 8 h 2 X );<br>then xo is a minimum point of f over U. Observe in this case<br>that f is convex on U.<br>For instance if H is a real Hilbert space and b 2 H is given then,<br>the critical point xo of the the functional ‘ dened on H by<br>‘(x) =<br>jjxjj2<br>2<br>+ hb; xi ;<br>is the minimum point (i.e., xo = ô€€€b) .<br>18<br>Note.<br>Let H be a Hilbert space and f : H ! R be twice continuously<br>dierentiable. Then for every x 2 H, there exists (according<br>to the Riesz Representation Theorem) a bounded linear operator<br>A : H ! H which is symmetric and satises<br>D2f(x)(h1; h2) = hAh1; h2i :<br>I<br>19</p> <br><p></p>

Blazingprojects Mobile App

📚 Over 50,000 Research Thesis
📱 100% Offline: No internet needed
📝 Over 98 Departments
🔍 Thesis-to-Journal Publication
🎓 Undergraduate/Postgraduate Thesis
📥 Instant Whatsapp/Email Delivery

Blazingprojects App

Related Research

Philosophy. 2 min read

A Model for Ethical Decision-Making in Autonomous Artificial Agents...

This research explores how to help autonomous artificial agents, like robots or self-driving cars, make ethical decisions when facing dilemmas. As these machine...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Pharmacy. 2 min read

A Conceptual Framework for Enhancing Medication Adherence Through Pharmacist-Patient...

This research focuses on understanding how better communication between pharmacists and patients can improve medication adherence, which is when patients follow...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Paediatrics. 3 min read

A Framework for Holistic Pediatric Growth and Development Assessment...

This research focuses on creating a comprehensive framework that can be used to assess how children grow and develop in all areas—physical, cognitive, emotion...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Office technology. 4 min read

A Framework for Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Office Technology Practices...

This research aims to develop a practical framework to effectively integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into office technology practices. In modern workplaces...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Nursing. 4 min read

Developing a Holistic Framework for Nurse-Patient Relationship Enhancement in Chroni...

This research focuses on creating a comprehensive and practical framework to improve the relationship between nurses and patients who are managing long-term, ch...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Music. 3 min read

A Framework for Analyzing Emotional Expression in Cross-Cultural Music Performance...

This research explores how emotions are expressed and perceived in music performances that come from different cultural backgrounds. Music is a universal langua...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Microbiology. 3 min read

A Framework for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance Development in Clinical Bacteria...

This research aims to develop a helpful framework that can predict how bacteria that cause infections in hospitals and clinics become resistant to antibiotics. ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Medical Rehabilitati. 2 min read

A Framework for Patient-Centered Design in Remote Medical Rehabilitation Programs...

This research focuses on creating a practical framework to guide the design of remote medical rehabilitation programs that are centered around the needs and pre...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Medical Laboratory S. 4 min read

A Framework for Standardizing Quality Control Practices in Clinical Laboratory Testi...

This research focuses on developing a clear and practical framework to standardize quality control practices in clinical laboratory testing. Quality control in ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
WhatsApp Click here to chat with us