- TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE...........................................................................................................I
CERTIFICATION.......................................................................................II
DEDICATION ..........................................................................................III
TABLE OF CONTENT..............................................................................IV
LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................VII
LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................VIII
ACKNOWLEDGEMEENT ......................................................................X
ABSTRACT...............................................................................................XI
NOMENCLATURE ..................................................................................XII
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1INTRODUCTION ................................................................................1
- 1.2BACKGROUND OF STUDY ………………………………………..3
1.
- 2.1APPLICATIONS OF HORIZONTAL WELLS……………………4
1.
- 2.2ADVANTAGES OF HORIZONTAL WELLS.….………………...5
1.
- 2.3DISADVANTAGES OF HORIZONTAL WELLS……………..…..5
1.
- 2.4INFLOW PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP………………….…5
- 1.3PROBLEM STATEMENT……….………………..………………..5
- 1.4RESEARCH OBJECTIVE………….……………………………..….6
- 1.5RESEARCH QUESTION….…..…………………………...………...6
- 1.6JUSTIFICATION OF THIS STUDY……………..………………….7
- 1.7SCOPE OF STUDY…………………………………………………..8
- 1.8AIMS/OBJECTIVES…………………………………………..........14
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- …………………………………………………..…………15
- 2.1LITERATURE REVIEW…………………….……………………….…15
- 2.2PRODUCTIVITY INDEX………………………………………….…...18
- 2.3HORIZONTAL WELL PRODUCTIVITY……………………………...19
2.
- 3.1BORISOV’S MODEL………………………………………...….…….20
2.
- 3.2GIGER’S MODEL……………………………………………………...21
2.
- 3.3JOSHI’S MODEL…………………………………………………….22
2.
- 3.4RENARD AND DUPUY MODEL……………….…………………..23
2.
- 3.5ELGAGHAD, OSISANYA AND TIAB MODEL……………………..24
2.
- 3.6BABU AND ODEH (PSEUDO-STEADY STATE) MODEL…………25
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- …………………………………………….….…………23
- 3.1MODEL DESCRIPTION………………………………………..…….…23
- 3.2INDIVIDUAL LAYER AND BOUNDARY CHARACTERIZATION…27
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- …………………………………………………………....31
- 4.1ANALYSIS OF RESULT………………………………………....31
- 4.2PERCENTAGE DEVIATION OF RESULTS…………….……...32
- 4.3DISCUSSION……………………………………………………..32
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- …………………………………………...…………….….55
- 5.1CONCLUSION………………………………….………….……55
- 5.2RECOMMENDATION………………………………………….73
REFERENCES………………………………….…………………...56
APPENDIX……………………………………….………………....59
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4- SEQ Table \* ARABIC 1: Comparison of Productivity index Result
Table 1A: Variation of Productivity Index with Changing Well Length
Table 1B: Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Well Productivity at Various Reservoir Thickness
Thesis Abstract
ABSTRACT
As the petroleum industry continues to experience advances and progress in drilling techniques, the use of horizontal well in field development has been increasing very rapidly throughout the oil industry. It becomes therefore important to adequately determine the performance of horizontal wells.
The existing methods available to determine horizontal well productivity at steady state requires complex mathematical analysis and are difficult to develop. In the course of this work, a new method was developed using simple analytical methods. Results obtained by this new method were compared to that gotten from already established methods of Borisov (1964), Giger (1984) and Joshi (1988). The major objective of this work is to present a simple and effective means to estimate the performance of horizontal wells. An excel sheet was also created in the course of this project to calculate and compare productivity index gotten from the various method. The spread sheet also enable me carry out sensitivity analysis of the results gotten by varying key parameters.