The prerequisites of a valid will; a critical analysis
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Evolution of Wills
- 2.2Legal Framework of Wills
- 2.3Types of Wills
- 2.4Requirements of a Valid Will
- 2.5Common Issues with Wills
- 2.6Challenges in Will Interpretation
- 2.7International Perspectives on Will Making
- 2.8Importance of Will Planning
- 2.9Will Contestation Cases
- 2.10Future Trends in Will Making
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Data Collection Methods
- 3.3Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Validity and Reliability
- 3.7Research Limitations
- 3.8Research Assumptions
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data
- 4.3Comparison with Existing Literature
- 4.4Interpretation of Results
- 4.5Implications of Findings
- 4.6Recommendations for Practice
- 4.7Suggestions for Further Research
- 4.8Conclusion of Findings
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Research
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications
- 5.5Recommendations
- 5.6Areas for Future Research
- 5.7Final Thoughts
Thesis Abstract
Abstract
A will is a legal document that outlines how a person's assets and properties should be distributed after their death. In order for a will to be considered valid, there are several prerequisites that must be met. This research project critically analyzes the key requirements for a will to be legally recognized. One of the primary prerequisites of a valid will is that the individual creating the will, known as the testator, must have the legal capacity to do so. This means that the testator must be of sound mind and at least 18 years old. Mental capacity is crucial to ensure that the testator understands the implications of their will and is not being unduly influenced by others. Additionally, a valid will must be created voluntarily, without any coercion or fraud. The testator should be acting of their own free will and not under any pressure from family members, friends, or other interested parties. Any indication of undue influence can invalidate a will and lead to legal disputes. Furthermore, a valid will must be in writing, whether it is typed or handwritten. Verbal wills, also known as oral wills, are generally not recognized as legally binding documents. The written will should clearly state the testator's wishes regarding the distribution of their assets and properties. Another important requirement for a valid will is the presence of witnesses. Depending on the jurisdiction, wills may need to be signed in the presence of witnesses who can attest to the testator's mental capacity and the voluntary nature of the will. Witnesses play a crucial role in validating the authenticity of the will and reducing the risk of fraud or disputes. Moreover, a valid will should also clearly identify the beneficiaries who will inherit the testator's assets. This ensures that the testator's intentions are clearly documented and can be carried out according to their wishes. Failing to specify beneficiaries or providing vague instructions can lead to confusion and potential challenges to the will's validity. In conclusion, the prerequisites of a valid will are essential to ensure that the testator's final wishes are upheld and legally recognized. By meeting these requirements, individuals can create a clear and enforceable will that minimizes the risk of disputes among beneficiaries and protects the distribution of their assets after death.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p>The concept of WILLS is of great importance. This concept originated from the Roman Law and was passed on to English Law from where the nations of the Commonwealth accepted it as part of the received English Law. Its origin lies in the fact that it was thought highly desirable to actualize the wishes of a dying person as a legal and binding obligation. This involved the person who came to make a wish which was later named the TESTATOR as well as the person(s) to carry out those wishes who came to be known as executor(s). And lastly, it involved those who had to benefit from those legacies, being simply called the beneficiaries or more technically referred to an <em>CESTIUS QUE TRUST.</em></p><p>A Will therefore is three-pronged thus:</p><p>TESTATOR</p><p>BENEFICIARIES EXECUTORS/TRUSTEES</p><p>It is beyond dispute that one great concern of a property owner is that he naturally wants to know what will happen to his property when he dies. Ordinarily, he will want to provide for his family and one sure way of doing so is that his houses, farms etc should descend to them after his death. It is from a Will therefore, that the property owner’s dream will be achieved. And for the Will to be enforceable, it must be in accordance with the stipulated requirements.</p><p><strong>1.1 THE LEGAL PROBLEM </strong></p><p>Will making remains a popular and even necessary practice because the old law of intestate succession was felt to be unsatisfactory. To make a valid Will, a person must be in his or her right mind. A person also must be of full age, that is to say, be twenty-one years old, and must state his wishes in writing, signed by himself and attested by two witnesses, who sign their names at the foot or end of the document in his presence and in the presence of each other. The witnesses too must be of full age and in their right mind. Thus, in an indirect way, the impartiality of the witnesses is as far as possible ensured.</p><p>The interpretation of Wills has given rise to untold litigation, and the rules and principles that have been developed in the resultant case law fill many volumes of abstruse and intricate doctrine. The main legal problem therefore centers around the animosity that flows from different interested parties who appear to be aggrieved because of the content of the Will thereby giving rise to different interpretation of the Will.</p><p><strong>1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM</strong></p><p>Research has found that there are so many people eager to know more about Wills. The thirst for knowledge about Wills is on the increase. A property owner will naturally want to know what will become of his property after his demise, and ordinarily would want to cater for his remnants after his demise. This will lead to a preparation of a Will.</p><p>It is not enough for a Will to be made because some Wills could be declared invalid based on certain inconsistencies (this will be shown in further discuss). Therefore, to have a Valid Will, one must have in mind the requisites of a Valid Will.</p><ul><li><strong>RATIONALE AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY</strong></li></ul><p>The importance of Wills in the life of a people cannot be overestimated. Death is an inevitable end of earthly life. We are living witnesses to the destruction of family units at the end of the patriarch’s life due to disagreement over inheritance. Homes have been broken and scattered, children and relations have become mortal enemies in their struggle to share the properties of the deceased.</p><p>While it may be true that because of the feud and unending litigation that sometimes attend some Wills, some of the people have become scared about Wills, the overwhelming majority are thirsty for knowledge about Wills. They want to know why they ought to make Wills and their advantages over other manners of disposition of property in consideration of death.</p><p>This research work is meant to be a guideline on how to make Wills that will stand the test of time.</p><p><strong>1.4 SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY </strong></p><p>The scope of this research work is to enunciate more on Wills, and also lay down the essential factors that will make a Will valid, or invalid. These factors shall be analysed critically. This work centers on its scope and is limited to that.</p><p><strong>1.5 DATA COLLECTION AND METHODOLOGY</strong></p><p>Data collection for the purpose of this research work is wholly from library work which comprise a search in textbooks and jurist opinion.</p><p><strong>1.6 LITERATURE REVIEW</strong></p><p><strong>WHAT IS A WILL?</strong></p><p>Generally, the word “WILL” may mean an instrument, or it may mean all the testamentary document by which a testators property is disposed off, or devised.</p><p>According to Osborne,[1] a Will is a disposition by which the person making it (the testator) provides for the distribution or administration of (his) property after his death. It is always revocable.</p><p>A Will according to Swinburne2 is a lawful disposition of that which any would have done after his death.</p><p>Black Stone3 defines the Will as “The legal declaration of a man intention which he Wills to be performed after his death”.</p><p>The celebrated nineteenth century English writer Jarman4 says:</p><p>A Will is an instrument by which a person makes a disposition of his property to take effect after his decease, and which is in its nature ambulatory and revocable during his lifetime.</p><p>In the words of P.T. Afangideh5, a WILL is a legal instrument for the transfer of property or obligations from the testator to the beneficiaries through the medium of Executors, which transfer is ineffectual until the death of the testator. A WILL therefore, is a law, a decree, a testament made by the testator on matters touching and concerning his estate, family and future.</p><p>WILLS according to the Blacks Law Dictionary6 is defined as a document by which a person gives his or her estate to be distributed upon death.</p><p>A WILL is a creation of statute. For it to be valid, it must comply strictly with the provisions of the relevant statute. The courts are strict in the observance of statutory prescriptions on Wills.</p><p>Scarman J. in <strong><em>Re Fuld (Deceased)</em></strong><strong><em>7</em></strong> clarifies the position succinctly as follows:</p><p>Darkness and suspicion are common features in WILL cases: Because it is often difficult, and sometimes impossible to discover the truth, the law insists on two types of safeguards in WILL cases. The first type of safeguard is part of the substantive law – the requirements of proper form and due execution. Such requirements …are no mere technicalities. They are the first line of defence against fraud upon the death. The second type of safeguard is the second line of defence. It is invoked when there are circumstances which give rise to suspicion: it is the safeguard of strict proof. In case where no suspicion reasonably arises, the court will allow inferences, presumptions as they are sometimes called, to be drawn from the regularity of a testamentary instrument upon its face, or the fact of the execution. But if there are circumstances, whatever be their nature, which reasonably give rise to suspicion, the court must be on its guard. It must ensure that the burden of proof rests upon the party propounding the WILL: and he must satisfy the conscience of the court that the instrument so propounded is the last WILL of a free and capable testator”.</p><p>Over the years, the courts had devised as indicated above by Scarman J, a long line of authorities to ensure that no fraud was perpetrated against the wishes of the testator and, in fact, the WILL was made by him voluntarily when he possessed full capacity to make it.</p><p>In summary, a WILL will be given a working and functional definition which will graphically bring out and bear out the dictum of his Lordship in the aforementioned case thus:</p><p>It is a testamentary and revocable document, voluntarily made, executed and witnessed according to law by a testator with sound disposing mind wherein he disposes of his property subject to any limitation imposed by law and wherein he gives such other directives as he may deem fit to his personal representatives otherwise known as his executors, who administer his estate in accordance with the wishes manifested in the WILL.</p><p>[1] G. Osborne, the Concise Law Dictionary 2001, p. 355</p><ol><li>Testaments and Last Wills 1640 pt. 1, & 4</li></ol><ul><li>L. Com. 499</li><li>WILLs, 8th 1951, 26</li><li>WILLS probate & Estate Administration in Nigeria and the Common Wealth 2001, pgs. 2-3</li><li>7th 1999</li></ul><p>7 . (1965) 2 All E. R. 776</p>
<br><p></p>