The legal perspective to capital reconstruction of banks in nigeria
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Capital Reconstruction in Banking Sector
- 2.2Historical Perspectives on Capital Reconstruction of Banks
- 2.3Regulatory Framework for Capital Reconstruction
- 2.4Challenges Faced in Capital Reconstruction
- 2.5Impact of Capital Reconstruction on Banks
- 2.6Best Practices in Capital Reconstruction
- 2.7Case Studies on Successful Capital Reconstruction
- 2.8Comparison of Capital Reconstruction Models
- 2.9Future Trends in Capital Reconstruction
- 2.10Summary of Literature Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Research Philosophy
- 3.3Research Approach
- 3.4Data Collection Methods
- 3.5Sampling Techniques
- 3.6Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.7Ethical Considerations
- 3.8Limitations of Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data
- 4.3Discussion on Capital Reconstruction Strategies
- 4.4Comparison of Findings with Literature
- 4.5Implications of Findings
- 4.6Recommendations for Practice
- 4.7Recommendations for Future Research
- 4.8Conclusion of Findings
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Research
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications
- 5.5Recommendations for Action
- 5.6Areas for Future Research
- 5.7Reflection on Research Process
Thesis Abstract
Abstract
The capital reconstruction of banks in Nigeria is a critical aspect of the financial sector, especially in light of the regulatory requirements and economic challenges facing the industry. This research project delves into the legal perspective of capital reconstruction in Nigerian banks, analyzing the relevant laws, regulations, and guidelines that govern this process. The study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework surrounding capital reconstruction and its implications for banks in Nigeria. Through an in-depth analysis of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA), the Central Bank of Nigeria Act, and other relevant legislation, this research examines the legal provisions that mandate capital reconstruction for banks in distress. The project also explores the role of regulatory authorities such as the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation in overseeing and enforcing capital reconstruction requirements. Furthermore, the research investigates the challenges and complexities associated with capital reconstruction in Nigerian banks from a legal perspective. This includes issues related to compliance, enforcement, and the protection of stakeholders' interests during the reconstruction process. By examining case studies and regulatory practices, the study aims to identify best practices and legal strategies for successful capital reconstruction in the Nigerian banking sector. In addition, this research project explores the implications of capital reconstruction on corporate governance, risk management, and financial stability in Nigerian banks. By analyzing the legal framework in conjunction with industry practices, the study seeks to assess the effectiveness of current regulations and identify areas for improvement to enhance the resilience and stability of the banking sector. Overall, this research project contributes to the existing literature on capital reconstruction in Nigerian banks by providing a comprehensive analysis of the legal perspective. By shedding light on the regulatory framework, challenges, and implications of capital reconstruction, this study offers valuable insights for policymakers, regulators, legal practitioners, and other stakeholders involved in the banking industry. The findings and recommendations from this research aim to inform future policy decisions and practices related to capital reconstruction in Nigerian banks, ultimately contributing to a more robust and sustainable financial system.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><div><p>It is generally accepted that banks are inevitable component of an economic system and</p><p>that the capital of a bank is the foundation on which it stands. This foundation has continued to</p><p>witness dynamic changes leading to crisis that often threaten to rock the foundation of our</p><p>banking system. At each of the point the crisis the depositors had always turned to the state and</p><p>the central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for help. Unfortunately the two have no coordinated</p><p>resolution scheme that would punish those responsible for depositors and other creditor’s woes</p><p>and at the same time save money for the state or taxpayer from the cost of resolution of the crisis.</p><p>It has therefore become necessary to examine the legal perceptive to rehabilitation of this basic</p><p>aspect of our banks and the banking system particularly the challenges faced by the institutions</p><p>responsible for bank’s capital reconstruction during and after crisis</p><p>The major player in resolution of banking crisis –the CBN has just two major tools for</p><p>crisis management namely the power of liquidation and the power of lender of last resort. The</p><p>exercise of power of liquidation has a direct negative impact on the depositors’ confidence</p><p>especially where depositors have lost money to a failing or failed bank.</p><p>The power of lender of last resort guarantees that no depositors lose money to failing or</p><p>failed bank but it leaves a lot of legal and moral issues unresolved. The first issue is that the cost</p><p>of repaying the depositor fund is borne by the tax payers’ money instead of the bank</p><p>management that are often responsible for mismanagement of the bank’s capital that lead to the</p><p>crisis.</p><p>Secondly the criminal legal system often does not punish the perpetrators of fraud and</p><p>mismanagement leading to either liquidation or spending of tax payers’ money. The result is that</p></div><div><p>instead of strengthening the corporate governance culture in the banks in the system, the lender</p><p>of last resort tends to encourage carelessness frauds and mismanagement in the banking system.</p><p>This therefore calls for extension of the roles of the regulatory institutions in the system</p><p>from mere intervention to active participation in fashioning and implementing lasting capital</p><p>reconstruction measures in the banks. The research proceeded on the assumption that banking</p><p>crisis will continue to happen, there will continue to be need for resolution scheme that will</p><p>reconstruct the bank’s capital and beef up liquidity else panic will ensue in the system which</p><p>may lead to total collapse of the banking system.</p><p>Therefore there is the need to harmonize the legal procedures and institutions necessary</p><p>for capital reconstruction in the country.</p></div><div><p><strong>CHAPTER</strong> <strong>ONE</strong></p><p><strong>GENERAL INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>1.0</strong> <strong>BACKGROUND</strong> <strong>TO</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>PROBLEM</strong></p><p>In Medieval Latin, capital appears to have denoted the head of cattle</p><p>or other livestock, which have always been important source of wealth</p><p>beyond the basic meat, milk, hides, wool and fuel they provide1. Like the</p><p>modern capital livestock has the potential to generate surplus value for</p><p>accumulation. This principle of accumulation and preservation of wealth</p><p>ran through ages. This probably was the reason Adam Smith stated that,</p><p>“for accumulated asset to become active capital and put to additional</p><p>production, it must be fixed and realized in some particular subject after its</p><p>labour is past”2. Capital asset can be rented (for one off production) or</p><p>acquired out rightly for joint input in series of production. This nature</p><p>enable capital to command two prices i.e. the service price (rent) and or</p><p>asset price3.</p><p>Hernando, D. S. <em>The Mystery of Capital,</em> <em>Finance</em> and Development, March 2001 Vol. 38 No 1 p.29. also available at http:/<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/frand/2001/03/Desoto.htm">www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/frand/2001/03/Desoto.htm</a> visited on 04/03/2010</p><p>2 Ibid</p><p>3 Yotopoulos ,J and Jeffery N. B. <em>Economics</em> <em>of</em> <em>Development</em> <em>Empirical</em> <em>Investigation</em> Harper Row publishers New York pp164-165</p></div><div><p>Today capital includes any asset that can be stored up for later use in</p><p>the production of goods and services. Even some kind of labour has been</p><p>classified as a specie of capital hence the use of the term “human capital”</p><p>to differentiate human trained skill and entrepreneurship from primitive</p><p>labour. Capital in a classical conception “ is born when the economic</p><p>potential of an asset is represented in writing- in titles as security, a</p><p>contract, and other such records and when the most economically and</p><p>socially useful qualities about the asset as opposed to the virtually more</p><p>striking aspects of the asset is considered”4 . The dynamic nature of capital</p><p>underscores its importance and explains why it will continue to engage the</p><p>minds of lawyers and economists.</p><p>It is obvious that in any market system, large proportion of wealth is</p><p>concentrated in capital in the forms of interests held in share, securities,</p><p>futures exchanges and deposit with banks and other financial institutions.</p><p>Banks are also known to be the fulcrum upon which the capitalist system</p><p>revolves. It is therefore important for the efficient operation of the market</p><p>system that capital of banks and the banking system should be preserved</p><p>4 Hernado, D. S. op.cit</p></div><div><p>and periodically restructured to maintain safety and soundness in banking</p><p>system.</p><p>Because of this nature of capital, capital accumulation will continue</p><p>to be central issue for legal and economic development. In no other system</p><p>is the multiplicative power of capital better exemplified than the banking</p><p>system. Banks provide a vital channel through which credit is made</p><p>available to the real sector of the economy for production of goods and</p><p>services. Governments also use banks as medium to transmit and stimulate</p><p>economic growth through their monetary polices. Government has through</p><p>the Central Bank used monetary, regulatory and supervisory policies to</p><p>strengthen the banking system.</p><p><strong>1.1.</strong> <strong>JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RESEARCH</strong></p><p>Numerous issues in corporate and banking sector restructuring that</p><p>arise consistently during bank crises in Nigeria point to inherent conflict in</p><p>banking business as shareholders attempt to achieve higher returns on</p><p>their investment at the expense of depositors and other stakeholders in the</p><p>banking system. As a result, all banks however well their risks are managed</p></div><div><p>have the same inherent flaw in their balance sheets. Their liabilities are</p><p>certain and short-term whereas their assets are uncertain in value and</p><p>long-term in nature. This sameness of banks, results in a high tendency for</p><p>known problems in one bank to spread rapidly to other banks and to the</p><p>whole banking system if the problems are not checked.</p><p>Failure to strike a balance between profit motive of stakeholder in</p><p>the banking system and protection of the depositors fund has resulted in</p><p>failure of some banks in Nigeria. Our judicial and regulatory process</p><p>appeared ill equipped to tackle these challenges.</p><p>While there are</p></div>
<br><p></p>