Immunity clause under the nigerian 1999 constitution
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Immunity Clause
- 2.2Historical Evolution of Immunity Clause
- 2.3Types of Immunity Clauses
- 2.4Arguments For and Against Immunity Clause
- 2.5International Perspectives on Immunity Clause
- 2.6Case Studies on the Application of Immunity Clause
- 2.7Challenges Faced with Immunity Clause
- 2.8Proposed Reforms on Immunity Clause
- 2.9Comparison of Immunity Clauses in Different Countries
- 2.10The Future of Immunity Clause
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Methodology
- 3.2Data Collection Methods
- 3.3Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Research Limitations
- 3.7Research Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Research Findings Interpretation
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data
- 4.3Comparison with Existing Literature
- 4.4Discussion on Key Findings
- 4.5Implications of Findings
- 4.6Recommendations for Future Research
- 4.7Practical Applications of Findings
- 4.8Limitations of the Study
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications
- 5.5Recommendations for Policy and Practice
- 5.6Areas for Future Research
Thesis Abstract
The immunity clause under the Nigerian 1999 Constitution is a provision that grants certain government officials immunity from civil and criminal prosecution during their tenure in office. This clause has been a subject of debate and controversy in the Nigerian legal and political landscape. This research project aims to explore the origins, scope, and implications of the immunity clause in the Nigerian Constitution. It will delve into the historical context in which the provision was included in the constitution and examine how it has been interpreted and applied by the courts over the years. The study will also analyze the rationale behind the immunity clause and its impact on governance, accountability, and the rule of law in Nigeria. By examining case law and scholarly literature, the research will assess the extent to which the immunity clause has been used to shield public officials from accountability and hinder the fight against corruption. Furthermore, the project will consider the arguments for and against the immunity clause and evaluate whether it serves the public interest or undermines democratic principles. It will also examine the experiences of other countries with similar immunity provisions to draw lessons and best practices for Nigeria. In addition, the research will explore potential reforms to the immunity clause, including the possibility of limiting its scope or abolishing it altogether. By considering comparative constitutional law and international standards, the study will propose recommendations for improving the legal framework governing immunity for public officials in Nigeria. Overall, this research project seeks to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the immunity clause under the Nigerian 1999 Constitution and provide valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, scholars, and civil society organizations working to strengthen accountability and good governance in Nigeria. By shedding light on the complexities and implications of the immunity clause, this study aims to stimulate informed debate and facilitate evidence-based reforms to enhance transparency, integrity, and the rule of law in the Nigerian public sector.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><div><p><strong>1.0.0: INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p>Immunity clause under the Nigerian Constitution being a curse or a blessing is not only a current topic but equally controversial and intriguing. After several years of military rule, Nigeria has returned to a democratic rule since 29 May, 1999. However, the experience so far since Nigeria has returned to democratic rule shows that all has not been well with our democratic experience, especially as it affects the immunity of chief executives from judicial proceedings. Of interest to this writer was the statement made by General Muhammed Buhari (Rtd.) former Nigeria military Head of State and the Presidential candidate of a political party1 during the 2011 elections on March 1st 2011,he said:</p><blockquote><p>We will amend the Constitution to remove immunity from prosecution for elected officers in criminal cases2.</p></blockquote><p>Preliminary, the first question that comes to our mind is what is immunity in this context? According to Bola Ajibola (SAN)3,the answer to this question is simple; ‘it is nothing but another word for exemption’. It is this immunity that is enshrined in the NigerianConstitution. Hence, wehave the immunity clause under section 308 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution.The section has provided for the immunity of President,Vice President,Governors and their deputies. Thus, since the Constitution was passed into law, it becomes our Fons et Origo and so with the immunity clause in it.<br>It is believed that the Constitution must at all time cardinally be our shield and sword, it must at all time protect all the citizen of this nationwide;female,male,young or old,fair play,human rights,as well as sustaining the rule of law. When in our national anthem we say ‘the nation bound in freedom peace and unity’,the only juristic guarantee for that is our Constitution4. Akin to this is the concept of rule of law which establishes that all men are equal before the law. This postulation became a doctrine well established by Dicey5 via; the Supremacy of the rule of law of the land and equality before the law. In summary, no man should be placed above the law, rather every man whatever his or her position in life in the country is subject to the ordinary law of the land in the country.<br>It is against this backdrop that this writer find it pertinent to check whether the immunity clause which has passed the test of supremacy having being enshrined in the Constitution, has also passed the test of equality before the law,that is,does the immunity clause not make some people ‘untouchable rabbits’? Here in this work, after examining the nomenclature of the immunity clause,we will see whether it is hindering the development of this country(a curse)or if it is advancing the course of the country (a blessing). Recommendation will now be made on the exercise of the doctrine in order to fine tune it to the demands of democratic governance in Nigeria.</p><p></p></div><h3></h3><br>
<br><p></p>