Impact of torrefaction on the fuel properties of lignite, coconut shells, cassava peels and their blends | Blazingprojects Postgraduate Thesis
Home / Industrial chemistry / Impact of torrefaction on the fuel properties of lignite, coconut shells, cassava peels and their blends

Impact of torrefaction on the fuel properties of lignite, coconut shells, cassava peels and their blends

 

Table Of Contents


  • TITLE PAGE – – – – – – – – – – -i CERTIFICATION- – – – – – – – – – -ii DEDICATION- – – – – – – – – – -iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS- – – – – – – – – – iv TABLE OF CONTENTS- – – – – – – – – -v LIST OF TABLES- – – – – – – – – – -xiii LIST OF FIGURES- – – – – – – – – – – x ABSTRACT- – – – – – – – – – – -xi

Chapter ONE

INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1Coal- – – – – – – – – – – -1
  • 1.2Coal Formation- – – – – – – – – – -1
  • 1.3Coal Combustion- – – – – – – – – -3
  • 1.4Environmental Impacts of Coal- – – – – – – -3
  • 1.5Biomass- – – – – – – – – – – -4
  • 1.6Justification of the Study- – – – – – – – -5
  • 1.7Objectives of the Study- – – – – – – – – -6

Chapter TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

  • 7
  • 2.1Coal as a Source of Energy- – – – – – – – -7
  • 2.2Coal Classification- – – – – – – – – -7
  • 2.3Physical and Chemical Properties of Coal – – – – – -9
  • 2.4Analysis of Coal- – – – – – – – – -9 2.
  • 4.1Scanning Electron Microscope– – – – – – – -10
  • 2.5Reliance on Coal- – – – – – – – – – -10
  • 2.6Lignite as a Source of Energy- – – – – – – – -11 2.
  • 6.1Emissions from Lignite- – – – – – – – -13 2.
  • 6.2Lignite Treatment- – – – – – – – – -14
  • 2.7Biomass as a Source of Energy- – – – – – – – -15 2.
  • 7.1Air Pollution from Biomass- – – – – – – – -17 2.
  • 7.2Biomass Energy density- – – – – – – – -18
  • 2.8Biomass Torrefaction- – – – – – – – – -18 2.
  • 8.1Basic Principle of Torrefaction- – – – – – – -23 2.
  • 8.2Advantages of Torrefaction- – – – – – – – -24 2.
  • 8.3Applications of Torrefied Biomass- – – – – – – -25
  • 2.9Biomass Co-Firing- – – – – – – – – -26 2.
  • 9.1Biomass Co-firing and gaseous emissions – – – – – – -27

Chapter THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • 3.1Sampling /Sample Collection- – – – – – – – -29 8
  • 3.2Sample Preparation- – – – – – – – – -30
  • 3.3Proximate Analysis- – – – – – – – – -31 3.
  • 3.1Moisture Content- – – – – – – – – -31 3.
  • 3.2Volatile Matter- – – – – – – – – -31 3.
  • 3.3Ash Content- – – – – – – – – – -32 3.
  • 3.4Fixed Carbon- – – – – – – – – – -32 3.
  • 4.Calorific Value- – – – – – – – – -32
  • 3.5Ultimate Analysis- – – – – – – – – -33
  • 3.6Torrefaction- – – – – – – – – – -33
  • 3.7Scanning Electron Microscopic Test (SEM) – – – – – – -33
  • 3.8Data analysis- – – – – – – – – – -34
  • 3.9Potential Emission of Green House Gases from the Torrefied samples- – -34

Chapter FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

  • RESULTS AND DISCUSION
  • 4.1RESULTS- – – – – – – – – – -36 4.
  • 1.1Proximate Analysis Results- – – – – – – – -36 4.
  • 1.2Ultimate Analysis Results- – – – – – – – -39 4.
  • 1.3Statistical Analysis Results- – – – – – – – -44 4.
  • 1.4Comparisons of Significance- – – – – – – – -45 4.
  • 1.5Results of the Potential Emissions of the Raw and Torrefied Samples- – -48 4.
  • 1.6Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Results of samples- – – – -50
  • 4.2DISCUSSION- – – – – – – – – – -58
  • 4.3CONCLUSION- – – – – – – – – – -66 9 REFERENCES- – – – – – – – – – -68 APPENDIX- – – – – – – – – – -79 

Thesis Abstract

The effect of torrefaction temperature and residence time on the fuel properties of lignite, biomass
(coconut shells and cassava peels) and their blends was investigated. The samples were subjected to
three torrecfaction temperatures (200, 260 and 300oC) and at two residence times (10 and 20
minutes) using programmable muffle furnace. Blends of torrefied lignite and biomass were prepared
in two different ratios (8020 and 7030). The energy content, proximate and ultimate analyses of the
samples were determined using ASTM methods. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to
evaluate the pore size, fiber content, topography and the morphology of the samples. The potential
emissions of SO2, CO2 and NOx from the torrefied samples were evaluated using emission estimation
model for fossil fuel electric power generation. The proximate analysis showed that the ash (8.0 %)
and moisture (30.0 %) contents of lignite were higher than that of the biomass. The coconut shells
and cassava peels had higher volatile matter of 72.9 % and 68.1 % respectively and much lower
fixed carbon. The data showed that release of volatile matter decreased at severe torrefaction
condition. The content of fixed carbon and energy increased with the severity of the torrefaction
condition except for cassava peels which decreased at 300 oC. One–way analysis of variance on the
results of the proximate analysis showed that there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the
volatile matter, fixed carbon, energy and ash content of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels, but
no significant difference between the moisture and solid yield. For the blends, volatile matter was
found to be higher than that of lignite alone. Increase of biomass ratio in the blends decreased the
carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur content of the
samples. Lignite/coconut shells (7030) had better fuel properties compared to (8020) and lignite/ca
ssava peels (at both ratios). Results of the ultimate analysis showed that after torrefaction there were
large reduction in oxygen and hydrogen content. However, 15 % carbon, 26 % nitrogen and
72 % sulfur was reduced from cassava peels while lignite recorded an increase of 40 % carbon,5
6 % nitrogen and 48 % sulfur after torrefaction. The SEM image showed that torrefied lignite had a
uniform and denser structure compared to the raw. The torrefied coconut shells showed a
destroyed and less fibrous structure than the raw while the torrefied cassava peels showed a smootsu
rface. The fiber length of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels decreased after torrefaction.
Results of the emission potential showed that emissions of SO2,CO2 and NOX from lignite and
coconut shells increased after torrefaction, while cassava peels decreased. It was also found that b
lending biomass and lignite reduced emissions of SO2, CO2 and NOX from lignite. Torrefaction
improved the fuel properties of lignite and biomass such as heating value grindability, hydrophobicit
y, and uniformity. Blending the two fuels (lignite/biomass) provided a way to compensate the
negative effects of each other. Therefore, producers of power and heat should explore the use
of torrefied lignite, coconut shells, cassava peels and their blends as suitable fuels.

 


Thesis Overview

<p> INTRODUCTION<br>1.2 Coal<br>One of the most important field of study in the realm of science and technology is that of<br>fuel because the whole of our world’s civilization is based upon an unceasing availability of<br>power. Coal (from the Old English term col, which meant “mineral of fossilized carbon” since the<br>13th century) [1] is a combustible black or brownish-black sedimentary rock usually occurring in<br>rock strata in layers or veins called coal beds or coal seams. It is one of the most important of the<br>primary fossil fuels and is composed primarily of carbon along with variable quantities of other<br>elements, chiefly hydrogen, sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen [2].<br>Although fossil fuels have their origin in ancient biomass, they are not considered biomass<br>by the generally accepted definition because they contain carbon that has been “out” of the carbon<br>cycle for a very long time. Their combustion therefore disturbs the carbon dioxide content in the<br>atmosphere. Their structure varies based on their age and also the amount of pressure applied over<br>time.<br>Coal is the most abundant fuel in the fossil family [2]. United States has more coal reserves<br>than any other country in the world. In fact, one-fourth of all known coal in the world is in the<br>United States, with large deposits located in 38 states [2]. Like all fossil fuels, coal can be burned to<br>release energy.<br>1.2 Coal Formation<br>14<br>Coal forms from the accumulation of plant debris usually in a swamp environment. When<br>plant dies and falls into the swamp, the standing water of the swamp protects it from decay.<br>Swamp waters are usually deficient in oxygen, which would react with the plant debris and cause it<br>to decay. This lack of oxygen allows the plant debris to persist. In addition, insects and other<br>organisms that might consume the plant debris on land do not survive well under water in an<br>oxygen deficient environment. To form the thick layer of plant debris required to produce a coal<br>seam, the rate of plant debris accumulation must be greater than the rate of decay. Once a thick<br>layer of plant debris is formed, it must be buried by sediments such as mud or sand. The weight of<br>these materials compacts the plant debris and aids in its transformation into coal. About ten feet of<br>plant debris will compact into just one foot of coal. Plant debris accumulates very<br>slowly. Therefore, accumulating ten feet of plant debris will take a long time. The fifty feet of<br>plant debris needed to make a five-foot thick coal seam would require thousands of years to<br>accumulate.<br>Due to the variety of materials buried over time in the creation of fossil fuels and the<br>length of time the coal was forming, several types were created. Depending upon its composition,<br>each type of coal burns differently and releases different types of emissions. The four types (or<br>“ranks”) of coal mined today are lignite, sub-bituminous, bituminous, and anthracite. Coal forms<br>when dead plant matter is converted into peat, which in turn is converted into lignite, then subbituminous<br>coal, bituminous coal and lastly anthracite. This involves biochemical and geological<br>processes (diagenesis and catagenesis respectively). The major methods of mining coals are<br>surface (opencast or open cut) mining, underground (deep) mining and underground gasification.<br>Lignite is a soft brownish-black coal; it forms the lowest rank of the coal family. It has<br>higher moisture and less carbon content than the higher rank coal. Nigeria has the largest deposit<br>15<br>of lignite in Africa e.g. Garinmaiganga and Tai mines in Gombe state [3]. Sub-bituminous is a dull<br>black coal. It gives off a little more energy (heat) than lignite when burned. In Nigeria, subbituminous<br>coal is mined in Onekama and Okpara mine in Enugu state and Okaba mine in Benue<br>state. [4] Bituminous coal has more energy than sub-bituminous but Anthracite is the hardest coal<br>and gives off the greatest amount of heat upon combustion. Unfortunately, in Nigeria, as elsewhere<br>in the world, there is little anthracite coal to be mined.<br>1.3 Coal Combustion<br>Coal combustion is the burning of coal in the presence of oxygen. This aims at heat<br>(energy) generation. When the combustible materials such as carbon, hydrogen or compounds<br>containing these are ignited in the presence of air (oxygen), combustion takes place. The<br>combination of carbon, hydrogen and sulfur with oxygen may be expressed by the following<br>equations.<br>C + O2 CO2 ……………..… (1)<br>2H2 + O2 2H2O ………….….. (2)<br>S + O2 SO2…………….… (3)<br>Sulfur in coal burns off as gaseous sulfur which combines with oxygen to form SO2 and probably<br>SO3 on further oxidation. The combustion of coal releases several environmental pollutant such as<br>SO2, NO2, CO, CO2, and CH4<br>[5].<br>1.4 Environmental Impacts of Coal<br>16<br>The environmental impact of coal includes issues such as land use, waste management,<br>water, and air pollution. Starting from coal mining, blasting, processing, transportation and use of<br>its products, SO2, NO2, CO, CO2, and CH4 are formed [6, 7]. These gases are hazardous to<br>health. They affect the vegetation and aquatics when diffused to streams, rivers and air [8-10]. In<br>addition to atmospheric pollution, coal combustion produces hundreds of millions of tonnes of<br>solid waste products annually, including fly ash, bottom ash, and flue-gas desulfurization<br>sludge [11-13].<br>1.5 Biomass<br>Biomass is a renewable energy source not only because its energy comes from the sun but<br>also because biomass can re-grow over a relatively short period of time. Through the process of<br>photosynthesis, chlorophyll in plants captures the sun’s energy by converting carbon dioxide from<br>the air and water from the ground into carbohydrates—complex compounds composed of carbon,<br>hydrogen, and oxygen [14]. When these carbohydrates are burnt, they turn back into carbon dioxide<br>and water and release the energy they captured from the sun [15-18]. In this way, biomass functions<br>as a sort of natural battery for storing solar energy. Biomass is a biological material derived from<br>living or recently living organisms. It often refers to plants or plant-based materials which are<br>specifically called lignocellulose biomass [19-24]. It refers to organic matter that has stored energy<br>through the process of photosynthesis [25, 26]. It exists in one form as plants and may be transferred<br>through the food chain to animal’s bodies and their wastes. All of which can be converted for<br>everyday human use through processes such as combustion, which releases the carbon dioxide<br>17<br>stored in the plant material [27, 28]. Many of the biomass fuels used today come in the form of wood<br>products, dried vegetation, crop residues and aquatic plants.<br>1.6 Justification of the Study<br>The importance of energy for a nation’s development cannot be overemphasized. This is<br>because energy is the cornerstone of economic and social development. In Nigeria, the energy<br>demand is high and is increasing geometrically while the supply remains inadequate. The energy<br>supply mix must thus be diversified through promoting and developing the abundant energy<br>resources present in the country to enhance the security of supply.<br>Coal which generates 40% of the world’s electricity has however been neglected for a long<br>time in Nigeria because the existed coal power production facilities degraded the environment<br>through pollution. Alternatively, co-firing biomass along with coal offers advantages but mostly<br>boilers are specifically designed for coals of certain ranks such as bituminous and subbituminous<br>coal. This is because bituminous and sub bituminous coal has higher carbon and lower<br>moisture contents compared with lignite. There are less similar ranking for lignite and biomass.<br>And since their physical properties are highly diverse, so are the costs for getting these fuels from<br>the field or into the boiler. Biomass and lignite have a relatively low-energy density and high<br>moisture content and as such tend to rot during storage. Biomass has the tendency to have a fibrous<br>nature that can make it difficult to grind into small particles. In order to successfully co-fire<br>biomass with lignite, both fuels need pretreatment to increase the heating value, hydrophobicity,<br>bulk density, stability during storage and grindability.<br>18<br>Torrefaction has been proposed as a method to improve biomass`s properties for<br>gasification and combustion. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the impact of such a<br>treatment on the fuel properties of lignite, cassava peels and coconut shell.<br>1.7 Objectives of the Study<br>The objectives of this study are as follows:<br>1. To produce suitable torrefied biomass that can improve the fuel properties of lignite.<br>2. To investigate the effect of torrefaction temperature and residence time on the physical and<br>chemical properties of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels.<br>3. To investigate the effect of torrefaction on the pore size, fiber content, topography and<br>the morphology structure of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels.<br>4. To determine the influence of blend ratio on the fuel properties of the torrefied lignite, coconut<br>shells and cassava peels.<br>5. To investigate the effect of torrefaction on the possible reduction of pollutant elements from the<br>lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels.<br>19 <br></p>

Blazingprojects Mobile App

📚 Over 50,000 Research Thesis
📱 100% Offline: No internet needed
📝 Over 98 Departments
🔍 Thesis-to-Journal Publication
🎓 Undergraduate/Postgraduate Thesis
📥 Instant Whatsapp/Email Delivery

Blazingprojects App

Related Research

Mass communication. 4 min read

Comparative Analysis of Social Media Influence on Political Engagement in Urban and ...

This research explores how social media platforms influence people's involvement in politics, comparing how this influence differs between urban and rural commu...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Marketing. 3 min read

Comparative Analysis of Social Media Influencer Impact on Consumer Purchase Intentio...

This research explores how social media influencers affect consumer decisions to purchase products or services, comparing different types of influencers to see ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Linguistics. 3 min read

Cross-linguistic Analysis of Pragmatic Functions in Digital Communication Contexts...

This research explores how different languages are used in digital communication platforms like social media, instant messaging, and emails, focusing on the way...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Library Science Educ. 2 min read

Comparative Analysis of Digital Literacy Skills in Library Science Students Across C...

This research explores the digital literacy skills of library science students in different countries to understand how well they are prepared to navigate digit...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Library and informat. 2 min read

Comparative Analysis of Digital Literacy Skills in Academic Library Users Across Uni...

This research explores the digital literacy skills of students and staff who use academic library resources across different universities. Digital literacy refe...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Comparative Analysis of Data Privacy Laws in the EU and US...

This research aims to compare how data privacy is protected by laws in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US). Data privacy is increasingly importan...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Insurance. 3 min read

Comparative Analysis of Claims Management Efficiency in Public and Private Insurance...

This research focuses on examining how effectively insurance companies manage claims, specifically comparing public (government-owned) and private (independent)...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Industrial and Produ. 4 min read

A Comparative Analysis of Lean and Six Sigma Implementation in Manufacturing Industr...

This research explores two popular approaches used by manufacturing companies to improve their processes: Lean and Six Sigma. Lean focuses on eliminating waste ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Human Nutrition and . 2 min read

Comparative Analysis of Dietary Patterns and Nutritional Status in Urban versus Rura...

This research aims to compare the dietary habits and nutritional health of adolescents living in urban areas with those in rural areas. Adolescents are at a cri...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
WhatsApp Click here to chat with us