LEARNING DISABLED AND NORMAL ACHIEVING STUDENTS’ CAUSAL ATTRIBUTES FOR THEIR PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES
Table Of Contents
- Title page — – – – – – – – – – – i
Declaration — – – – – – – – – – -ii
Approval page — – – – – – – – – – -iii
Dedication — – – – – – – – – – -iv
Acknowledgement — – – – – – – – – -v
Table of content — – – – – – – – – -vi Abstract — – – – – – – – – – – -vii
Thesis Abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the causal attributions made by learning disabled (LD) and normal achieving (NA) students for their academic performance outcomes. The participants included 200 students (100 LD and 100 NA) from various schools. The students were asked to complete a questionnaire that assessed their causal attributions for success and failure in academic tasks. The results indicated that both LD and NA students tended to attribute their success to internal factors such as effort and ability, while attributing failure to external factors such as task difficulty or luck. However, LD students were found to attribute failure more to internal factors compared to NA students. Furthermore, LD students were more likely to attribute success to external factors compared to NA students. These findings suggest that LD students may have a tendency to blame themselves for failures more than NA students, which could have implications for their self-esteem and motivation. The results also highlight the importance of considering students' causal attributions when designing interventions to support their academic performance. Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms driving these differences in causal attributions between LD and NA students.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><p>Students with learning disabilities (LD), or learning difficulties, form a large significant group in China. Research has shown that the prevalence rate in young people up to the age of 18 ranges from a low of 4.86% to a high of 31.62% (He, 2005; Liu, 2000; Wang, 2003; Yao, 2009). A major reason for such a wide discrepancy is the plethora of definitions and diagnostic criterion, none of which have been widely adopted across China. Learning Disabled</p><p>The more simplified the criterion used, the higher the rate of identified students. However, no matter which rate is referred, given such a large country, the population of students with LD will always be large. For the purpose of this paper, LD will be used referring to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition that there is a significant disability of learning that cannot be solely accounted for by mental retardation, visual acuity problems, or inadequate schooling (2010, p196). In China over the past two decades, LD has increasingly received attention from many research fields such as education, psychology and medicine. Learning Disabled</p><p>The current research LD follows two basic tracks: one is to explore the cognitive development, and the mechanisms of information processing of students with LD, as well as to design effective interventions to solve problems and disabilities that occurred during their cognitive development; the other is to explore their social development, including mind and behaviour, emotional development, social competence, and social cognition, and so on (Yu, 2005). The latter is more recent, but has become a hot topic, in which the research on attribution and motivation of students with LD is a new focus (Chen, 2007; Li, Liu & Dong, 2006; Zhao, 2010).Learning Disabled</p><p>Among the various theories of attribution, Weiner’s (1979, 1985, 1986) Attribution Theory is one of the most popular and has been commonly applied by Chinese researchers on LD among fifferent populations (e.g., Luo, 2000; Zhao, Zhang, Geng & Shen, 2005) and in different subjects (e.g., Chang, 2010; Hu, 2009). Weiner’s Attribution Theory Attribution theorists assume that individuals seek to understand why events have occurred (Schuster, Forsterlung, & Weiner, 1989, p. 192).Learning Disabled</p><p>Weiner and his colleagues originally developed the research on the causes of success and failure. Guided by Heider’s causal structure (1958), they initially assumed that ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck were perceived as the most responsible causes for success and failure in achievement-related contexts, among which ability and effort were the most dominant determiners (Weiner, 1985). Later, they put forward that factors such as mood, fatigue, illness, biases of others, and unique factors to specific situations were necessary causes (Weiner, Russell,& Lerman, 1978). In the centre of Weiner’s Attribution Theory, are two related models. First, the theory categorized the perceived causes into three dimensions: locus of causality, stability, and controllability (Weiner, 1979, 1986). Locus of causality is concerned as a backward-looking belief, thus, it focuses on whether the cause is internal or external to the individual (Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002).Learning Disabled.</p>
<br><p></p>