Land availability challenges and mismanagement: issues and solutions
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Historical Overview of Land Management
- 2.2Theoretical Frameworks in Land Availability
- 2.3Global Perspectives on Land Mismanagement
- 2.4Case Studies on Land Challenges
- 2.5Policy and Legal Implications in Land Management
- 2.6Environmental Impact of Land Misuse
- 2.7Social and Economic Consequences of Land Issues
- 2.8Technological Innovations in Land Monitoring
- 2.9Community Involvement in Land Conservation
- 2.10Best Practices in Sustainable Land Use
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Methodology
- 3.2Sampling Techniques and Data Collection
- 3.3Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.4Qualitative Research Approaches
- 3.5Quantitative Research Methods
- 3.6Ethical Considerations in Research
- 3.7Validity and Reliability of Data
- 3.8Limitations of the Research Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data Collected
- 4.3Comparison with Existing Literature
- 4.4Interpretation of Results
- 4.5Implications for Land Management
- 4.6Recommendations for Policy Changes
- 4.7Future Research Directions
- 4.8Case Studies on Successful Land Management
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion and Implications
- 5.3Contributions to the Field
- 5.4Practical Applications of Research
- 5.5Recommendations for Future Action
Thesis Abstract
Land availability challenges and mismanagement issues and solutions Abstract
Land availability is a critical issue facing many regions globally, with escalating populations and expanding urban areas putting pressure on limited land resources. This research delves into the challenges and consequences of land availability issues, focusing on both developed and developing countries. The mismanagement of land resources exacerbates the problem, leading to environmental degradation, loss of biodiversity, and social conflicts. Factors contributing to land mismanagement include inadequate land use planning, ineffective land tenure systems, corruption, and poor enforcement of land-related laws. To address these issues, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. This includes improving land governance through transparent policies, strengthening land tenure security, promoting sustainable land use practices, and enhancing community engagement in land management decisions. In developed countries, innovative land use planning strategies such as smart growth initiatives and green infrastructure development have shown promise in optimizing land use and minimizing urban sprawl. On the other hand, in developing countries, land reform programs aimed at securing land rights for small-scale farmers and indigenous communities can help prevent land grabbing and promote equitable access to land resources. Furthermore, the integration of technology, such as geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing, can aid in effective land monitoring and decision-making processes. These tools provide valuable data for assessing land use changes, identifying areas at risk of degradation, and supporting evidence-based policymaking. Collaboration between various stakeholders including government agencies, local communities, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector is crucial for implementing sustainable land management practices. Capacity building programs and knowledge sharing initiatives can empower local communities to actively participate in land governance processes and ensure the equitable distribution of land benefits. In conclusion, addressing land availability challenges and mismanagement requires a comprehensive and inclusive approach that considers social, economic, and environmental aspects. By implementing sustainable land management practices and fostering collaboration among stakeholders, it is possible to mitigate the negative impacts of land scarcity and promote the responsible use of land resources for future generations.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><p>INTRODUCTION</p><p>1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY</p><p>Abuja the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria has tremendous importance in the country’s life and development. It is a hotbed for political fermentation, such that generates centripetal attraction from all corners of the country, perhaps nowhere has the need for judicious use and preservation of exhaustive land resources become imperative in Nigeria today than the Federal Capital City. From the outcome of the panel set up by the Federal Government led by Justice T.A Aguda to relocate the Federal Capital Territory from Lagos to Abuja, an 8,000km2 land was carved out of the central region of the country to serve as the Federal Capital Territory for the Nation. There was a misconception that the original inhabitants’ population to be resettled was only between 25,000 and 50,000. However, a later survey in 1984 revealed that their actual population was about 150,000. More than 30 years later, this population has multiplied many times as a result of natural increase and migration.</p><p>It is pertinent to understand that the 8,000km2 as the size of the FCT, was not recommended by the International Planning Associates (IPA), the planning firm that produced the Abuja Master Plan, but by the FCT Location Committee, and has been defined in the 1976 FCT Decree even before the IPA was commissioned in June 1977 to plan the city, with the size as one of the terms of reference. Thus, the Abuja master plan has originally been designed with the concept that the whole area has already been evacuated. It was later discovered that the number of the original inhabitants was grossly underestimated. The resettlement cost was astronomical, to the extent of being higher than the money needed for the city development (Elleh, 2012). It therefore became necessary to change the resettlement policy from total evacuation to phases, depending on the actual area needed for the city development.</p><p>In ideal situation what should precede plot allocation are land availability, layout design and provision of infrastructure. In order to avoid waste, plots sizes are supposed to be determined relative to the needs of the allotees. If ones need could be contained in 500m2, then any excess portion beside that is a colossal waste of the land resources. Many others that need it could not get because somebody already has the title. In April 2012, the FCT Minister made a revelation at a stakeholders forum, that 90% of allocated plots in the FCT are not developed, which he attributed to lack of infrastructure. Because aggregate provision of infrastructure in the FCT since existence is not more than 25%. However, it is interesting to note that, till date there are many plots in Phase I that were provided with the infrastructure for almost 30 years, but without meaningful development or are fenced only. Recently, there is another very disturbing revelation. It is plot no 2 cadastral zone E13 Gude District sized 465Ha. The outrageous allocation was made to an Accenture Associates Ltd, with address as no. 3104 Mpape, Kaduna Abuja Expressway. The allocation was made dated just only 2 months to the end of the administration. It is now in the property market, being speculated for billions of naira. Still there are large hectare allocations of the Ebele and Obasanjo farms (Jerremy, 2014).</p><p>Land Use and Allocation Committee (LUAC) is to make recommendation for lands allocations, but allocations are at times made before reverting to the LUAC.</p><p>The model is a misnomer of Financing Urban Infrastructure with Land Value, Never feasible for affordable housing, Distortion of the sharing formula, Not only providing the infrastructure but also saddling the responsibility of resettlement on the developer.</p><p><strong>1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM</strong></p><p>Abuja officially became Nigeria’s capital on 12 December 1991, replacing Lagos, though the latter remains the country’s most populous city. At the 2006 census, the city of Abuja had a population of 776,298, making it one of the ten most populous cities in Nigeria. Abuja has witnessed a huge influx of people into the city; the growth has led to the emergence of satellite towns such as Karu Urban Area, Suleja, Gwagwalada, Lugbe, Kuje and smaller settlements to which the planned city is sprawling. This growth has affected land availability thereby creating a lot of challenges, a situation whereby whoever needs a land cannot get it easily. However, the researcher is examining Abuja land availability, the challenges and mismanagement involved with a view of proffering solution.</p><p><strong>1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY</strong></p><p>The following are the objectives of this study:</p><p>1. To examine the challenges of land availability in Abuja.</p><p>2. To identify the issues of land mismanagement in Abuja.</p><p>3. To determine the solutions to the issues of land availability in Abuja.</p><p><strong>1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS</strong></p><p>1. What are the challenges of land availability in Abuja?</p><p>2. What are the issues of land mismanagement in Abuja?</p><p>3. What are the solutions to the issues of land availability in Abuja?</p><p><strong>1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY</strong></p><p>The following are the significance of this study:</p><p>1. The outcome of this study will enlighten the Nigeria public on the land related issues in Abuja. It will educate on the challenges and issues of Abuja land availability with a view of identifying the solutions.</p><p>2. This research will also serve as a resource base to other scholars and researchers interested in carrying out further research in this field subsequently, if applied will go to an extent to provide new explanation to the topic</p><p><strong>1.7 SCOPE/LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY</strong></p><p>This study on Abuja Land availability, challenges and mismanagement will cover all the issues related to land availability, mismanagement in Abuja.</p><p><strong>LIMITATION OF STUDY</strong></p><p>Financial constraint- Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire and interview).</p><p>Time constraint- The researcher will simultaneously engage in this study with other academic work. This consequently will cut down on the time devoted for the research work.</p><p>REFERENCES</p><p>Elleh, Nnamdi, Abuja, the single most ambitious urban design project of the 20th century</p><p>Jeremy. “Sunday, August 27, 2006 Abuja bush bars”. Retrieved 22 November 2013</p><p>“Resettlement Issues, Squatter Settlements and the Problems of Land Administration in Abuja, Nigeria’s Federal Capital” (PDF). fig.net. 5th FIG Regional Conference Accra, Ghana, 8–11 March 2006. Retrieved 2007-08-10.</p>
<br><p></p>