Toxic wastes and race at twenty: why race still matters after all of these years
Table Of Contents
Thesis Abstract
Abstract
Environmental racism continues to be a pressing issue in the United States, as toxic waste sites are disproportionately located in communities of color. This study examines the intersection of race and toxic waste disposal, focusing on how race continues to be a significant factor in the siting of hazardous waste facilities. By analyzing data from the past twenty years, this research aims to understand why race still matters in the context of toxic waste disposal despite advancements in environmental justice policies. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of demographic data with qualitative research methods to explore the complex dynamics at play. The findings suggest that race remains a critical determinant in the placement of toxic waste sites, with communities of color facing a higher likelihood of hosting hazardous waste facilities compared to predominantly white neighborhoods. This disparity highlights the enduring legacy of environmental racism in the United States and underscores the need for continued advocacy and policy interventions to address these inequities. The study also reveals the role of systemic factors, such as historical patterns of discrimination and land use policies, in perpetuating environmental injustices in marginalized communities. Moreover, the research sheds light on the social, economic, and health impacts of living near toxic waste sites, emphasizing the disproportionate burden borne by communities of color. Residents in these areas often experience higher rates of pollution-related health problems, limited access to resources, and diminished quality of life. The study underscores the urgency of addressing these environmental disparities to promote environmental justice and public health equity. In conclusion, this research contributes to the ongoing dialogue on environmental racism and the persistent significance of race in toxic waste disposal practices. By examining the historical context, current trends, and future implications of environmental injustices, the study underscores the need for comprehensive policy reforms and community-driven solutions to mitigate the unequal distribution of environmental hazards. Ultimately, the findings underscore the imperative of centering race in environmental justice efforts and advancing a more equitable and sustainable approach to waste management and pollution prevention.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><p>In 1987 the United Church of Christ’s (UCC) Commission for Racial Justice published its landmark report Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States. The report documented disproportionate environmental burdens facing people of color and low-income communities across the country</p><p>. The report sparked a national grassroots environmental justice movement and significant academic and governmental attention. In 2007, the UCC commissioned leading environmental justice scholars for a new report, Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty: Grassroots Struggles to Dismantle Environmental Racism in the United States. In addition to commemorating and updating the 1987 report, the new report takes stock of progress achieved over the last twenty years. ∗ Robert D. Bullard directs the Environmental Justice Resource Center at Clark Atlanta University. His most recent book is entitled</p><p><strong>GROWING SMARTER: ACHIEVING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND REGIONAL EQUITY (2007). ∗∗</strong></p><p>Paul Mohai is a Professor in the School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He has been a major contributor to the growing body of quantitative research examining disproportionate environmental burdens in low-income and people of color communities. ∗∗∗ Robin Saha is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Montana and affiliated faculty with its School of Public and Community Health Sciences.</p><p>He is among the leading scholars conducting quantitative studies of environmental inequality using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). ∗∗∗∗ Beverly Wright directs the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice at Dillard University. She is one of the nation’s leading environmental justice scholars and is a Hurricane Katrina survivor.</p><p><strong>GAL.BULLARD.W FIGURES AND TABLES 5/29/2008 3:21:07 PM 372</strong></p><p><strong>ENVIRONMENTAL LAW</strong></p><p><strong>[Vol. 38:371 Although Toxic Wastes and Race has had tremendous positive impacts, twenty years after its release people of color and low-income communities are still the dumping grounds for all kinds of toxins.</strong></p><p><strong>Using 2000 Census data, an updated database of commercial hazardous waste facilities, and newer methods that better match where people and hazardous sites are located, we found significant racial and socioeconomic disparities persist in the distribution of the nation’s hazardous wastes facilities. We demonstrate that people of color are more concentrated around such facilities than previously shown.</strong></p><p><strong>People of color are particularly concentrated in neighborhoods and communities with the greatest number of facilities and racial disparities continue to be widespread throughout the country. Moreover, hazardous waste host neighborhoods are composed predominantly of people of color. Race continues to be the predominant explanatory factor in facility locations and clearly still matters.</strong></p><p><strong>Yet getting government to respond to the needs of low-income and people of color communities has not been easy, especially in recent years when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has mounted an all-out attack on environmental justice principles and policies established in the 1990s. Environmental injustice results from deeplyembedded institutional discrimination and will require the support of concerned individuals, groups, and organizations from various walks of life.</strong></p><p><strong>The Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty report condensed in this Article provides dozens of recommendations for action at the federal, state, and local levels to help eliminate the disparities. The report also makes recommendations for nongovernmental organizations and industry. More than one hundred environmental justice, civil rights, human rights, faith based, and health allies signed a letter endorsing these steps to reverse recent backsliding, renewing the call for social, economic, and environmental justice for all. Congress has begun to listen and take action.</strong></p>
<br><p></p>