Edge-Computing Accelerated Fault Diagnosis in Power Grids Using AI Edgelets
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of the Study
- 1.3Statement of the Problem
- 1.4Aim and Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Research Questions
- 1.6Research Hypotheses
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Scope and Delimitation of the Study
- 1.9Limitations of the Study
- 1.10Organisation of the Study
- 1.11Operational Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Conceptual Review: Edge-Computing for Fault Diagnosis in Power Grids
- 2.2Conceptual Review: AI Edgelets and TinyML in Critical Infrastructure
- 2.3Theoretical Framework: Resilient Edge Computing Architecture
- 2.4Theoretical Framework: Real-Time Data Processing and Latency Theory
- 2.5Empirical Review: Fault Diagnosis Methods in Power Grids
- 2.6Empirical Review: Edge Intelligence in Energy Systems
- 2.7Empirical Review: Distributed Inference for Protection Schemes
- 2.8Empirical Review: Anomaly Detection in Power Networks
- 2.9Empirical Review: Data Fusion for Smart Grid Diagnostics
- 2.10Empirical Review: Security, Privacy, and Trust in Edge Systems
- 2.11Empirical Review: Resource-Constrained AI on Field Devices
- 2.12Gaps in the Literature and Research Gaps Identified
- 2.13Conceptual Model: Integrated Edge-Cloud Fault Diagnosis Framework
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design: Mixed-Methods for Edge-Based Fault Diagnosis
- 3.2Philosophical Paradigm: Pragmatism in ICT-Driven Diagnostics
- 3.3Population of the Study: Power Grid Segments and Edge Devices
- 3.4Sample Size and Sampling Technique
- 3.5Sources and Instruments of Data Collection
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Instruments
- 3.7Data Collection Procedures
- 3.8Data Preprocessing and Feature Extraction
- 3.9Method of Data Analysis
- 3.10Model Specification: Edge-Inference and Edgelet Architectures
- 3.11Ethical Considerations
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
- 4.1Data Presentation: Edgelet Deployment Scenarios
- 4.2Descriptive Analysis: Latency, Throughput and Diagnostic Accuracy
- 4.3Hypotheses Testing: AI Edgelets vs Centralized Diagnostics
- 4.4Model Performance under Varying Network Conditions
- 4.5Interpretability and Explainability of Edgelet Inferences
- 4.6Robustness and Fault-Tolerance of Edge-Driven Diagnoses
- 4.7Comparative Analysis with Traditional Methods
- 4.8Discussion of Findings in Relation to Literature
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contribution to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications for Power Grids
- 5.5Recommendations for Stakeholders
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Studies
Thesis Abstract
The integration of edge computing with intelligent edge analytics offers a transformative approach to real-time fault diagnosis in modern power grids, addressing latency, bandwidth, and reliability constraints inherent to centralized cloud-based solutions. This study addresses the persistent challenge of timely and accurate fault detection in heterogeneous distribution and transmission networks, where conventional SCADA and PMU-based methods suffer from delayed response and limited local decision support. The aim is to develop an edge-centric fault diagnosis framework that leverages AI edgelets—compact, deployable AI modules running on near-field edge devices—for accelerated, interpretable fault classification and isolation under diverse operating conditions. Specific objectives include (1) to design and implement an AI edgelet architecture that enables distributed feature extraction, model inference, and collaborative decision fusion across substation gateways and regional edge nodes; (2) to formulate a scalable fault taxonomy and build a labeled dataset capturing transient, persistent, and cascading fault scenarios across 132/33 kV and 11 kV feeders; (3) to develop lightweight, hardware-aware machine learning models (e.g., pruned deep learning classifiers, graph neural networks, and ensemble methods) with provable bounds on inference latency and energy consumption; (4) to evaluate robustness under noise, communication delays, and data loss using a hybrid testbed that combines real-world archival recordings with synthetic perturbations; and (5) to provide guidelines for deployment, security, and governance of AI edgelets in operational grids. The methodology adopts a mixed-methods research design combining quantitative experimentation with qualitative stakeholder feedback. The population includes utility-grade substations and feeder sections within a regional transmission organization’s network. A stratified sampling technique selects 20 substations and 60 feeders, with data collected from synchronized PMU streams, fault records, relay logs, and ambient sensor readings over a 12-month period, supplemented by an open-access synthetic fault dataset to ensure rare-event representation. Data collection instruments comprise high-resolution time-stamped measurement collections, edgelet software decoders, and diagnostic labels corroborated by operator annotations. Validity and reliability are ensured through cross-validation, k-fold testing, and repeated-measures assessments of edge performance under variable network loads. The analysis uses a multi-tier framework (i) descriptive statistics to characterize fault incidence and edge latency distributions; (ii) regression-based and time-series analyses to quantify the relationship between feature quality, network conditions, and diagnostic accuracy; (iii) comparative model evaluation employing cross-validated precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the ROC curve for classifiers such as lightweight convolutional neural networks, graph neural networks, and gradient-boosted trees; (iv) ablation studies to identify critical edgelet components; (v) latency-energy trade-off assessment through profiling on representative edge hardware (e.g., ARM-based gateways with AI accelerators); and (vi) Monte Carlo simulations to propagate data losses and communication delays through the fusion architecture. A theoretical underpinning is provided by the Combine-and-Conquer framework for distributed inference and the Information Bottleneck principle to balance feature sufficiency against resource constraints, complemented by governance-informed security models addressing adversarial robustness and data integrity. Expected findings indicate that AI edgelets can reduce average fault diagnosis latency by 40–60% and improve classification accuracy by 5–12 percentage points relative to centralized baselines, while maintaining sub-50 ms inference times for common fault types and demonstrating resilience to up to 20% data loss in edge-to-edge communications. The study contributes to knowledge by delivering a validated edge-centric fault diagnosis architecture, a benchmark dataset for AI edgelets in power grids, and guidelines for deployment, safety, and interoperability. It concludes that distributed AI edgelets, when aligned with hardware-aware model design and secure communication protocols, can significantly enhance situational awareness, reduce outage durations, and improve grid reliability. Recommendations include standardizing edgelet interfaces, expanding the dataset with extreme weather faults, and pursuing pilot implementations with utility partners to assess long-term operational benefits and regulatory compliance.
Thesis Overview
Edge-Computing Accelerated Fault Diagnosis in Power Grids Using AI Edgelets aims to make fault detection in electrical grids faster and more reliable by processing data closer to where it is generated. The core idea is to deploy small, specialized AI modules—Edgelets—on edge computing devices distributed throughout the grid. These Edgelets analyze sensor data in real time to identify faults, anomalies, and potential equipment failures before they escalate, reducing outage times and improving system resilience.
Why it matters: Power grids are increasingly complex, with many dispersed sensors and evolving load patterns. Traditional centralized monitoring introduces latency and communication bottlenecks. Edge-embedded AI can provide near-instantaneous diagnostics, enable faster fault isolation, and support proactive maintenance, which translates into lower operational costs and greater reliability for consumers.
Problem or knowledge gap: While edge computing and AI have shown promise individually, there is limited understanding of how to design, deploy, and validate AI edge modules for real-time fault diagnosis in large-scale power networks. Questions remain about optimal Edgelet architectures, data fusion from heterogeneous sensors, model update strategies, and how to maintain accuracy under changing grid conditions and cyber-physical threats.
What the researcher will do step by step
- Review relevant theories on edge AI, distributed inference, and fault diagnosis in power systems.
- Design a modular Edgelet architecture that can run on typical grid edge devices (e.g., PMUs, RTUs, edge servers) and communicate with a central platform.
- Collect data from a testbed or simulated power grid with labeled fault events, including voltage, current, frequency, and state-estimator outputs; target sample size: several thousand fault and normal events.
- Develop and train lightweight AI models (e.g., compact CNNs or gradient-boosted trees) optimized for edge execution, with mechanisms for online learning and model updates.
- Implement data fusion strategies to combine multiple sensor streams and improve fault localization accuracy.
- Validate the approach through offline experiments and real-time streaming tests, using metrics such as detection latency, accuracy, precision/recall, and false alarm rate.
- Compare against centralized cloud-based fault diagnosis baselines to quantify gains in speed and reliability.
- Assess robustness to data gaps, noise, and cyber-physical attacks.
Expected contribution: a practical framework for deploying AI-driven fault diagnosis at the grid edge, including architecture guidelines, model design principles, data fusion methods, and evaluation benchmarks. The study should demonstrate performance improvements in detection speed and fault localization accuracy with scalable deployment considerations.
Possible outcomes: faster fault detection, reduced outage duration, enhanced grid resilience, and a set of best practices for operators seeking to implement edge-based diagnostic solutions.