An assessment of the impact of foreign direct investment on nigerian ecconmic growth (1990-2011)
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
- 2.2Historical Trends in FDI
- 2.3Theoretical Frameworks in FDI
- 2.4Impacts of FDI on Economic Growth
- 2.5FDI Policies and Regulations
- 2.6FDI in Developing Countries
- 2.7FDI in Nigeria
- 2.8Challenges of FDI
- 2.9Factors Influencing FDI
- 2.10FDI and Technology Transfer
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Research Approach
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Sampling Techniques
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Research Validity and Reliability
- 3.7Ethical Considerations
- 3.8Limitations of the Research
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Data Findings
- 4.2Analysis of FDI Trends in Nigeria
- 4.3Impact of FDI on Economic Indicators
- 4.4Sectoral Analysis of FDI
- 4.5Comparison with Regional FDI Trends
- 4.6Policy Implications
- 4.7Recommendations for Improving FDI
- 4.8Future Research Directions
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Implications for Nigerian Economic Growth
- 5.4Contributions to Existing Literature
- 5.5Recommendations for Policy and Practice
- 5.6Suggestions for Future Research
Thesis Abstract
Abstract
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has been a significant source of external finance for developing countries like Nigeria. This study aims to assess the impact of FDI on the economic growth of Nigeria from 1990 to 2011. The research employs a quantitative research design utilizing secondary data collected from the World Bank and the Central Bank of Nigeria. The data is analyzed using econometric techniques such as the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). The results of the study indicate a positive and statistically significant relationship between FDI and economic growth in Nigeria over the period under consideration. The findings suggest that FDI inflows have had a stimulating effect on the Nigerian economy, leading to increased GDP growth rates. The study also reveals that FDI has contributed to technology transfer, human capital development, and increased productivity in various sectors of the Nigerian economy. Furthermore, the research highlights the importance of creating a conducive investment climate and implementing policies that attract and retain FDI inflows. It underscores the need for stable political and economic environments, infrastructure development, and institutional reforms to maximize the benefits of FDI on economic growth. The study recommends that the Nigerian government continue to pursue policies that promote FDI inflows, including tax incentives, investment guarantees, and streamlined regulatory procedures. In conclusion, the findings of this research support the argument that FDI plays a crucial role in driving economic growth in Nigeria. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence of the positive impact of FDI on the Nigerian economy. It also offers valuable insights for policymakers, investors, and other stakeholders on the strategies needed to harness the full potential of FDI for sustainable economic development. Further research could explore the sectoral impact of FDI, the quality of FDI inflows, and the long-term implications of FDI on income distribution and poverty alleviation in Nigeria.
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><p>This study assess the impact of Foreign Direct Investment in Nigerian economic growth over the period of 1990-2011. Data from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Statistical Bulletin was used. The Ordinary Least Square (OLS) technique was specified and used to examine the relationship between the variables which includes the Gross Domestic Product as the dependent variable, export, Exchange rate, foreign direct investment and trade openness as the independent variables.</p><p>The explanatory power of the model was given by the R2 of 85.5% and was subjected to t-test and f-test to test the significance of the independent variables.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER ONE</strong></p><p><strong>1.0 </strong><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>1.1 </strong><strong>BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY</strong></p><p>Investors’ decisions and actions globally are influenced significantly by the dictates of self-interest which suggests that capital, not only be channeled to high-yielding economic sectors but also to those that are ostensibly quick yielding economies. On balance therefore investors would spun profitable opportunities characterized by extreme competitions, market glut, unfavorable regulation, long gestation periods and opt instead for investments that yield high returns within the shortest time possible. Base on this view, investors generally migrate from</p><p>one economy to another in search of better investment climate and higher returns.</p><p>This form of capital movement results in the creation of a typical investment called Foreign Direct Investment. In the opinion of Jomo (1988) Foreign Direct Investment can be explained to represent the flow of tangibles from a country abroad of capital, equipment and other production and processing facilities.</p>
<br><p></p>