The Emergence and Development of Social Enterprise Sectors
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Evolution of Social Enterprise Sectors
- 2.2Theoretical Frameworks in Social Entrepreneurship
- 2.3Impact of Social Enterprises on Society
- 2.4Challenges Faced by Social Enterprises
- 2.5Success Factors in Social Enterprise Development
- 2.6Comparative Analysis of Social Enterprise Models
- 2.7Global Trends in Social Entrepreneurship
- 2.8Policy Implications for Social Enterprise Growth
- 2.9Innovations in Social Enterprise Practices
- 2.10Future Prospects of the Social Enterprise Sector
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Approach
- 3.2Data Collection Methods
- 3.3Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Research Ethics and Integrity
- 3.6Reliability and Validity of Research
- 3.7Limitations of the Research Methodology
- 3.8Scope and Generalizability of Findings
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data Collected
- 4.3Interpretation of Results
- 4.4Comparison with Existing Literature
- 4.5Key Themes and Patterns Identified
- 4.6Implications for Social Enterprise Practice
- 4.7Recommendations for Future Research
- 4.8Areas for Further Exploration
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn from the Study
- 5.3Contributions to the Field of Social Entrepreneurship
- 5.4Practical Implications and Applications
- 5.5Recommendations for Stakeholders
- 5.6Reflections on the Research Process
- 5.7Suggestions for Future Research
- 5.8Closing Remarks and Final Thoughts
Thesis Abstract
ABSTRACT
The concept of integrating social aims with profit-making has been an emerging trend in the world today, especially in the wake of the 2007-2009 financial crisis which shone the spotlight on the problems of pure profit-maximization. Social Enterprise is at the very core of this new movement to integrate social aims with profits, taking root in an increasing number of circles today, ranging from the field of international development, to impact investing, and even public policy.
Keywords financial crisis, social enterprise, China
Thesis Overview
<p><b>1.0 Introduction </b></p><p>The concept of integrating social aims with profit-making has been an emerging trend in the world today,
especially in the wake of the 2007-2009 financial crisis which shone the spotlight on the problems of
pure profit-maximization. Social Enterprise is at the very core of this new movement to integrate social
aims with profits, taking root in an increasing number of circles today, ranging from the field of
international development, to impact investing, and even public policy.
In particular, Social Enterprise has grown spectacularly in India, with the country being referred to as “A
Social Enterprise Superpower”1
by Think, a social action think tank and action hub, as well as “A hotbed
for Social Enterprise” 2
by Beyond Profit magazine, a leading Social Enterprise magazine. Social
Enterprises have been extremely effective in driving development in India, home to one of the world’s
largest populations still living in poverty. On the other hand however, a country with seemingly similar
characteristics in terms of large populations of poor rural folk, China, has seen only a nascent Social
Enterprise sector. In contrast, 4 out of the 10 most innovative companies in India as ranked by Fast
Company are social enterprises, an indicator of the maturity of the Social Enterprise sector domestically.
The question that arises from this observation, is thus one of “why has Social Enterprise grown so
strongly in some countries and yet not others?” In particular, with China’s large rural poor demographic
which bears a striking similarity to India, what is holding back the development of Social Enterprise in
China?
As such, this paper will seek to understand how we can increasingly apply the tool of social
entrepreneurship to address the many developmental problems we find in China. To do so, we will
explore 4 key areas. First, to lay the foundations, this paper will address the wide range of Social
Enterprise definitions to identify the specific definition relevant to our objective of the application of
Social Enterprise to China. Second, this paper will look at Social Enterprise globally by individual regions
to understand the conditions necessary for the emergence of a Social Enterprise sector. Third, the
earlier understanding will subsequently enable us to apply these conditions to an analysis of India and
China, to determine the reason for the divergence of social enterprise emergence in China and India.
Fourth, and most importantly, this paper will examine the future of social enterprise development in
China, and analyze what possible measures could facilitate the growth of the sector domestically.
<br></p><p>
<b>1) Introducing Social Enterprise Definitions </b></p><p>Social Enterprise is a term that has been widely used and loosely applied to a wide variety of institutions
and organizations that it has become difficult to engage in a proper dialogue without first establishing
the precise definition to which one alludes to in coining an organization as a social enterprise. A 2008
study commissioned by the Office of the Third Sector in the UK reveals that the term is “poorly
understood”, and that such “confusion and lack of understanding is a major short term barrier to the
growth of social enterprise.”
3
As such, before we begin our exploration of the factors behind social
enterprise growth, particularly in China, we first need to examine the range of social enterprise
definitions to determine which will be applied in this paper.
J. Gregory Dees, Professor of the Practice in Social Entrepreneurship, founding faculty director of Duke
University’s Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, and often referred to as the
“Father of Social Entrepreneurship Education”4
, categorizes the plurality of Social Enterprise definitions
into two main types in a paper co-authored with Beth Anderson: (a) Social Enterprise, and (b) Social
Innovation.5
The Social Enterprise school of thought as laid out by Dees and Anderson is centered on the notion of
entrepreneurship as individuals who “start their own business”. As such, the corresponding definition of
a social enterprise tends toward a more generic model here, with organizations focusing on the dual
focus of economic and social value creation being classified as social enterprises.
<br></p>