Determination of active sweet components of common artificial sweeteners that are used as replacement for sugar
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.2History of Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.3Types of Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.4Chemical Composition of Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.5Health Effects of Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.6Comparison with Natural Sweeteners
- 2.7Regulatory Status of Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.8Consumer Perception of Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.9Market Trends in Artificial Sweeteners
- 2.10Future Developments in Artificial Sweeteners
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Sampling Techniques
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Research Validity and Reliability
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Timeframe for Research
- 3.8Budgetary Considerations
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Analysis of Data Collected
- 4.2Comparison of Active Sweet Components
- 4.3Impact of Processing on Sweeteners
- 4.4Consumer Preferences for Sweeteners
- 4.5Health Implications of Sweet Components
- 4.6Regulatory Compliance of Sweeteners
- 4.7Market Demand for Sweeteners
- 4.8Future Recommendations for Sweeteners
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Implications for the Industry
- 5.4Recommendations for Further Research
- 5.5Contribution to Knowledge
Thesis Abstract
This research investigated how the sweetness of sugar substitute compares to
the sweetness of sugar. In this research different percentage solution of sugar,
artificial sweetener and natural sweetener (10%, 1%, 0.1% and 0.01%) were
prepared. Ten volunteers were gathered for the sensory evaluation in this
case tasting of the solution, the volunteer‟s taste threshold of data was gotten.
The artificial sweetener was found out to be the sweetest among the
substances experimented and at the percentage of 0.1% and 0.01% saccharin
an artificial sweetener was able to mimic the taste of sugar. Research prove
that artificial sweetener are non-nutritive they have virtually no calories in
contrast to sugar which contains 4 calories at each gram, a teaspoon of sugar
is about 4 grams, for weight lose artificial sweetener may be an attractive
option to sugar. Artificial sweetener may also be a good alternative for
diabetic patient, unlike sugar; artificial sweeteners generally don‟t raise
blood sugar levels because they are not carbohydrates.
Thesis Overview
<p>
1.0 INTRODUCTION:<br>A sugar substitute is a food additive that duplicates the effect of sugar in<br>taste, usually with less food energy. Some sugar substitutes are natural and<br>some are synthetic. Those that are not natural are in general, called artificial<br>sweeteners. Artificial sweeteners and other sugar substitutes are found in a<br>variety of food and beverages marketed as sugar free or diet including soft<br>drinks, chewing gum, jellies, baked goods, candy, fruit juice and ice-cream<br>and yoghurt. [Whitney 2011]<br>People may not all like the same kind of baked treats but one thing we all<br>agree on is that baked treats should be sweets usually, sugar is used to lend<br>sweetness to foods but would cake taste just as good if the baker used a<br>sugar substitutes instead of sugar? Many people prefer not to use sugar often<br>due to health reasons and instead depend on sugar substitutes to sweeten<br>their foods. But are sugar substitutes the same as sugar? What exactly are the<br>differences between sugar and sugar substitutes?<br>Sugar also known as sucrose comes from plants like sugar cane and sugar<br>beets and is a carbohydrate. Sugar adds bulk to cakes, cookies and all kinds<br>of treats; sugar also causes browning and caramelizing in foods when it is<br>heated as when cookies turn golden brown in the oven sugar is a natural<br>substance, something that our bodies can use for energy.<br>Sugar substitutes come in three categories; artificial sweeteners, sugar<br>alcohols and natural sweeteners. Artificialsweeteners are attractive because<br>they add almost no calories to foods and are sometimes a part of weight loss<br>programs. Also they donot increase blood sugar levels which mean that<br>diabetics can use them. Many artificial sweeteners like sucralose were<br>discovered by accident in the laboratory. In 1976, a scientist in England was<br>studying different compounds made from sugar. The scientist asked a<br>student to test the compounds but instead the student tested them. Another<br>category of sugar substitutes is sugar alcohols. Sugar alcohols are not<br>alcoholic beverages they do not contain ethanol which is found in alcoholic<br>beverages. Sugar alcohols like sugar have calories and energy but not<br>asmuch as sugar. Sugar alcohols like artificial sweeteners do not contribute<br>to tooth decay and affect blood sugar levels slowly so diabetics can use them.<br>Although sugar alcohols like xylitol, sorbitol and erythritol are manufactured<br>products the sources are often natural.<br>The last category of sugar substitutes is called natural substitutes. The<br>categories include maple syrup, agave nectar and honey. These substances<br>are absorbed by our digestive system and contain calories and nutrients that<br>our bodies can use. [Michelle 2002]<br>The chart lists some popular sugar substitutes and how they‟re commonly<br>categorized:<br>Artificial<br>sweeteners<br>Acesulfame<br>potassium<br>(sunett,sweet<br>one)<br>Sugar alcohols<br>Erythritol<br>Novel<br>sweeteners<br>Stevia extracts<br>(pure via, truvia)<br>Natural<br>sweeteners<br>Agave nectar<br>Aspartame<br>(Equal,<br>Nutrasweet)<br>Hydrogenated<br>starch<br>hydrolysate.<br>Tegatose<br>(Naturlose)<br>Date sugar<br>Neotame Isomalt Trehalose Fruitjuice<br>concentrate<br>Saccharin<br>(sugartwin, sweet<br>“N” low<br>Lactitol Honey<br>Sucralose<br>(splenda)<br>Maltitol Maple syrup<br>Mannitol Molasses<br>Sorbitol<br>Xylitol<br>1.1 AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY<br>AIM: To create an alternative to sugar by replicating the sweetnessfound in<br>natural sugar.<br>Objectives:<br>To determine how the sweetness of sugar substitutes compare to the<br>sweetness of sugar. In this research sugar and sugar substitutes will be<br>tested and the sweetness will be compare in relation to sugar.<br>To compare the availability and affordability of the active components<br>in the artificial sweetener and sugar<br>To know the components of this artificial sweetener and what makes<br>them taste sweet<br>1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY<br>Artificial sweetener mimicking the taste of sugar will be a better alternative<br>to people who are suffering from diabetics. Unlike sugar, artificial<br>sweeteners generally don‟t raise blood sugar levels because they are not<br>carbohydrates.
<br></p>