Nigerian tax system: the significance of company income tax and its effects on nigerian companies

Thesis Overview

<p> </p><p>1.0 INTRODUCTION</p><p>1.1BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY</p><p>The numerousity of government wants at the expense of its limited resource make it imperative to source for funds through other means. One of the forms through which government source for funds to meet its obligation is taxation.</p><p>The versatility of taxation cannot be overemphasized. This is true because it does not only serve as one of the major sources of government revenue through which public interests are satisfied but also it is one of the major fiscal policy measure being used in stabilizing the economy. For instance, it can be used to curtail the velocity of money when inflation arises. Taxation also serves as an effective way of redistributing income among citizens of a nation.</p><p>In fact, taxation plays a crucial role in promoting economic activity and growth. through taxation, government ensures that resources are channelled towards Important projects in the society (Emeni, 2000).</p><p>It is necessary to mention that during the pre-colonial period, taxation functioned more or less on an ethnic basis. The Nigerian tax system took after the British tax system both in administration and governing</p><p>enactments. It is therefore not surprising that income tax as we know it today was first introduced into Nigerian by the British through Lord Lugard in 1904 in the North (Abdul Razaq, 1993).</p><p>The Nigerian tax system has about ninety various forms of levies which it imposes on the citizens and companies. These taxes fall under two basic categories, which are direct and indirect taxes.</p><p>Direct taxes are those taxes that are levied on incomes/profits of individuals, partnership and companies. These levies have direct incidence and Impact on tax payer. Examples of direct taxes include personal income tax, company income tax, which this research work is focused upon, capital gain tax, petroleum profit tax and capital transfer tax which had been abolished in Nigerian with effect from 1st January 1996 (Abdul Razaq, 1993 and Osita, 1999).</p><p>These taxes are governed by Decrees, Acts, and Case Laws, which constitute the statute is force today, personal income tax, company income tax, capital gain tax and petroleum profit are governed by Income Tax Management Act 1961, Company Income Act 1979, Capital Gain Tax Act 1967 and Petroleum Profit Tax 1959 respectively</p><p>Company income tax is governed by Company Income Tax Act of 1979. This Act consolidated the Company Income Tax Act 1961 and other amending legislations. This is true because existing Laws and Acts are only amended since no new ones have been enacted.</p><p>Part 1, Section 1 of the Company Income Tax Act 1979 provides that “administration of company income tax is to be by a Board of which the official name shall be the Federal Board of Inland Revenue”. Thus, Federal Board of Inland Revenue is responsible for the administration of company income tax which governs company income tax.</p><p>The other category of taxes which is indirect taxes are those taxes levied on the manufacturers, wholesalers and importers of goods and services in which effects are shifted wholly or partly to the final consumers of such goods and services. Example includes custom duty, Import duty and Value Added Tax (VAT).</p><p>Having taken interest in the happenings in recent time on Nigerian tax system and current economy trend in the country, this research work is focused on the significance of company income tax on Nigerian economy and its effects on Nigerian companies.</p><p>1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM</p><p>Despite the significance of taxation, it is clearly noticed that it has various impact which include;</p><p>Company income tax is imposed on taxable profit of the company, which reduce the investment capacities of the company</p><p>The company income tax has some adverse effects on the performance and financial position of the companies.</p><p>According to Abdul Razaq (1998), the tax system makes it more expensive for a company to maintain its net flow of dividend to its shareholders.</p><p>Withholding tax, which is a tax deductible from source, on the sum of all form of contract and services of the companies, has the capacity of tying down the capacity of companies.</p><p>Also education tax makes the companies to pay excess taxes, which result in reduction of their profits.</p><p>The retained earnings of companies are adversely affected.</p><p>1.3OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY</p><p>It is not an understatement that income tax has adverse effects on Nigerian companies, despite all its benefits on the Nigerian economy.</p><p>In the light of the above, this study extensively explains the company income tax by;</p><p>examining the way it (company income tax) is being administered as well as other related taxes.</p><p>analyzing various ways through which Nigerian companies are affected by the imposition of company income tax.</p><p>providing useful suggestions and recommendations to the foregoing.</p><p>1.4RESEARCH QUESTIONS</p><p>This research work is designed to carry out an in-depth study of the significance of company income tax and its effect on Nigerian companies like Union Bank PLC.</p><p>The questions are:</p><p>1.What are the roles of Company Income Tax in Union Bank PLC?</p><p>2.How does Company Income Tax affects Union Bank?</p><p>3.How does Company Income Tax reduce investment capacities of Union Bank PLC?</p><p>4.To what extent does the Company Income Tax affect the retained earnings of Union Bank?</p><p>5.What are the control measures of Company Income Tax adopted by Union Bank?</p><p>6.How does with-holding tax affect the capacity of Union Bank?</p><p>7.How does the tax system in Union Bank affects the net flow of dividends of its shareholders?</p><p>1.5RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS</p><p>Ho:Union Bank PLC are not affected by the imposition of Company Income Tax</p><p>H1:Union Bank PLC are affected by the imposition of Company Income Tax</p><p>Ho:Company Income Tax does not provide useful suggestions to Union Bank.</p><p>H1:Company Income Tax provide useful suggestions to Union Bank Plc.</p><p>Ho:Company Income Tax is not properly administered in Union Bank.</p><p>H1:Company Income Tax is properly administered in Union Bank.</p><p>1.6SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY</p><p>The significance of Company Income Tax and taxation as a whole cannot be undervalued because they contribute immensely to the economic growth and development.</p><p>This work will help tax administrators and government to realize the importance of taxation, so that much attention will be paid to it.</p><p>Also, this work is useful for our law makers since the critical effects of taxation on Nigerian companies are analyzed so that only reasonable laws will be made.</p><p>1.7SCOPE OF THE STUDY</p><p>The scope of the study can be defined geographically, temporally, and in terms of the subject matter. There are various forms of levies in Nigerian Tax System, examples include Petroleum Profit Tax, Personal Income Tax and Company Income Tax.</p><p>Hence, the scope of this study is limited to Company Income Tax and its effects on Nigerian companies.</p><p>Also, due to the fact that Nigerian organizations are multifarious in operation; ranging from Banking, Sea and Air, Insurance and others made it difficult for the research work to touch every sector. The Union Bank Ilorin is chosen as the case study. The recent five years (1999 to 2004) annual reports and financial statements of the organization are analyzed. Since there was no publication in the year 2000.</p><p>1.8LIMITATION OF THE STUDY</p><p>Since no study is perfect, this study therefore limited by the fact that the effects of taxes on companies are not contained in most texts, thus available data from the concerned organization are made use of.</p><p>1.9DEFINITION OF TERMS</p><p>Assessable Profits: According to Section 25, Subsection 1 of the Company Income Tax Act (1990), assessable profits are the profits of any company for each year of assessment from such source of its profits. They are the adjusted profits of any company for each year of assessment.</p><p>Balancing Charge: Ishola (1999) defined balancing charge as the excess of the sale proceeds from the disposal of assets over the tax written down value.</p><p>Basis Period: This refers to the accounting period of a business where income is assessable to tax in the year of assessment (Ishola 1999).</p><p>Capital Allowances: These are allowances granted to any individual i.e. sole trader or partners in a partnership or corporate body who during an accounting year ended in the preceding year of assessment incurred qualifying capital expenditure in respect of assets in use for the purpose of a trade or business in the last day of the basis period. It is given in place of depreciation (Baiyewu 2000).</p><p>Preceding Year Basis (PYB): Ishola (1999) defined preceding year basis of assessment under which the profit of the accounting period ending in the preceding year of assessment is assessable to tax in the year of assessment under consideration. It is a basis on which taxation of any company arises.</p><p>Tax Avoidance: Tax avoidance can be described as the art of dodging tax without actually breaking the law (Abdul Razaq, 1993).</p><p>1.9SUMMARY</p><p>This research work is divided into five chapters.</p><p>Chapter one is the theoretical background of the study. It states the rationale behind the study as well as the objectives for which the study is being carried out.</p><p>Chapter two is a critical review of the relevant literatures that have direct bearing to the study.</p><p>Chapter three clearly states the methodology employed in data collection and data analysis.</p><p>Chapter four focuses on the analysis of data collected and the presentation of findings.</p><p>Chapter five contains the summary, the conclusion as well as the recommendations.</p> <br><p></p>