Thesis Abstract

             ABSTRACT 

It is evident that in life, shelter remains the second basic necessity of human needs after food, and as such, many individuals act desperately to have their own personal dwelling. Therefore, the need to erect solid and functional building to avoid unexpected collapse is very essential. Building Collapse occur as a result of the following factors, factors such as; Poor workmanship, bad design, use of sub-standard building materials, foundation failure, faulty construction, extra-ordinary loads, among other factors such as negligence, design flaws, ageing, material fatigue, extreme operational and environmental conditions, accidents, terrorist attacks and natural hazards. Therefore, there is need to eradicate building collapse in Nigeria, most especially, the study area which is Lagos-Island as it is believed to have the highest number incidents of building collapse and require immediate attention. In view of the aforementioned therefore, this research work shall look into the problems that result into collapse of building in Nigeria whether design or construction or other related problems. However, having identified the problems of building collapse in the country with special focus on Lagos-Island, possible solution were thereafter proffered to solving the identified problems

Thesis Overview

INTRODUCTION 

Building collapse, though a common phenomenon all over the world is more rampant and devastating in the
developing countries. The incidence of building failures and collapses has become major issues of concern in the
development of this nation as the frequencies of their occurrence and the magnitude of the losses in terms of
lives and properties are now becoming very alarming. In fact, building collapse has now become a familiar
occurrence, even to layman on the street in Nigeria.
Failure in building can be described as the inability of the building components not being adequate to perform
what are normally expected or required of those components. On the other hand, when part or whole structure
has failed and suddenly gave way in a way that as a result of this failure, the building could not meet the purpose
for which it was intended, the building has collapsed.

 Failures in building can occur during different stages of
construction process itself, as well as after. In Nigeria, the common causes of building collapse have been traced
to bad design, faulty construction, use of low quality materials, hasty construction, foundation failure, lack of
proper supervision, ineffective enforcement of building codes by the relevant Town Planning Authorities, lack of
proper maintenance e.t.c. (Folagbade, 2001 and Badejo, 2009)
Cases of building collapse are not restricted by climatology or level of urbanization as they cut across cultural
and ethnical barriers. 

Many cases of building collapse have been reported in Nigeria. For instance, Folagbade
(2001) and Chinwokwo (2000) enumerated forty-two (42) cases of building collapse as occurring between 1980
and 1999 in Nigeria while Makinde ( 2007) listed fifty-four (54) cases occurring between January 2000 and June
2007 alone. Building collapse has also been observed to cut across the different categories of building – private,
corporate or public. Folagbade (2001) showed that of the twenty-five (25) reported cases of building collapse
between 1980 and 1999 in Lagos State, private (76%), corporate (12%) and government or public buildings
(12%) accounted for these proportions. Also, building collapse is no respecter of size of the structure. Amusan
(1991) reported that Barnawa flat disaster in 1977 was a three-storey building, a public building (Secondary
School) which collapsed in March 1988 at Ibadan was two-storey building, the collapsed show-room for cars in
Lagos in 1987 was just a storey building while that of the Primary School in IIoabuchi, River State in July 1991
was a bungalow building. 

Folagbade (2001) also reports that the Abuja building which collapsed in March, 1993
and the one at Ojuelegba in 1999 were both multi-storey buildings. The memory of the incidents of two separate
building collapses that occurred at Ebute-Meta area of Lagos State and Kano State which killed several people in
2007 still lingers on. Also reported was the fence of a Nursery and Primary School that collapsed at Olomi area,
Ibadan, in March, 2008, thereby killing thirteen (13) pupils of the School. The death of over 50 students of Saque
Comprehensive College, Port Harcourt in1990 was as a result of the owner attempting to construct additional floors on structurally unsafe walling. 

Similar trends of conversion were observed in a collapsed Mosque building
in Mushin area, Lagos in 2001 and multi-storey commercial/residential building in Ebute-Meta also in Lagos
state in which several people were killed. Some of the cases of building collapse are also as a result of ignorance
on the part of developers and unauthorized conversion of buildings. Amusan (1991) asserts that the 1988
building collapse at Mushin, Lagos occurred when an attempt was made to raise the existing building by another
floor. Also, operational conversion caused the collapsed school building at PortHarcourt.
As posited by Adebayo (2000), the skill, experience and personal ability of the workmen involved in the building
construction is of utmost importance in creating value. However, this assertion can only be relied upon in a
situation where the developers/contractors are capable and willing to appreciate quality and be ready to pay a
commensurable reward in this regard. Ward (1979) classifies the contracting firms into three categories namely
large sized, medium sized and small sized firms. He opined further that while small sized firms deal mainly with
minor works, repair and maintenance of buildings in a particular locality, the large sized firms on the other hand,
deal with a wide range and size of activities on a national or even global basis. Ademoroti (1991) identifies three
types of Acts in the country as: Public Health Act; The Town and Country Planning Acts; and the Building
Regulation Act. 

According to the author, the public Health Act deals with all aspects of health sanitation and
environment as relating to the inhabitants of buildings. The Town and Country Planning Act deals with the
general location and planning in the town and country aspect such as spatial distribution of buildings,
highways/roads, schools, hospitals, sewage and drainage systems as well as other physical infrastructures. The
Building Regulation Act represents laws that relate specifically to the control of the construction of buildings. It
was further stressed that an existing regulation is meaningless without carrying with it a mechanism to ensure
compliance because the average citizen does not obey a law that is not enforced. To this end, five types of
building regulatory enforcement inspectors are identified. They are: Safety or Building Inspectors who are
employees of local government; specification inspectors who are construction professionals engaged by the
owner of a building under construction to ensure compliance with his qualitative desires and the Federal
Government inspectors who enforce federal regulation on federal issues such as health, energy, environmental
protection e.t.c on federal government funded projects. 

Others include Public works inspectors who are
concerned with conformity with contracts and specification documents as well as specialist inspectors who are to
inspect and certify certain types of critical installations such as high-strength concrete, structural welding; highly
stressed masonry e.t.c. Table1 illustrates some of the reported cases of building collapse in Nigeria from1974 to
2010.

The Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary defined informal sector as a relaxed and friendly sector, not
following strict rules of how to behave or do. In the same vein, Uwakweh (2000) describes the informal sector as
“that segment of firms or individuals that engage in construction or other activities without obtaining the
necessary designs, planning and construction documents”. In other words, they always evade the formal process
of obtaining permits and approvals for their construction and related activities. According to Uwakwah (2000),
there are more informal construction programmes in the rural areas than in the cities but informal construction
also flourish in the urban areas because of the illegal structures that exist on the outskirts of the urban areas. The
informal sector rarely attracts high caliber workers who prefer to work for the larger contractors and the foreign
firms.
While it is certain that buildings are prone to deterioration and may not be possible to generally avert failure, it is
also expedient that the rate of collapse and the associated loss should be greatly reduced. Based on the results
obtained by Folagbade (2001), i.e. 76% of the reported collapsed buildings in Lagos state from 1980 to 1999
were private buildings, then the activities of the informal sector need to be investigated. 

This paper therefore
takes a critical look at the incessant cases building collapse in Nigeria by identifying the likely causes and also
investigates the activities of the informal sector in this context. The main objectives are to identify the likely
causes of building collapse in Nigeria and to also investigate the contributory role of the informal sector to this
incidence.

1.1 Research Methodology
To achieve these objectives, a survey was carried out on a target population of 150 contractors/developers as
well as 150 clients of completed/on-going buildings in the six goe-political regions of Nigeria who were
randomly selected from the study area. For each of the two categories of respondents, twenty five (25) copies
of well-structured questionnaires were administered to each of the six geo-political zones in a manner that ensure
even distribution across the region. The six geo-political regions of the country and the states covered are:
Southwest (Lagos), Southeast (Abia), South-south (PortHarcourt), Northwest (Sokoto), Northeast (Borno) and
the North Central (Benue). From these distributions, 90 and 95 questionnaires were respectively filled out and
returned by the contractors and the clients (This is further shown in Table 2). The questionnaires survey were
combined with direct interviews and site observations, especially with the illiterate and occupied respondents.
The method of data analysis employed for this study was the Descriptive Analytical Technique.

DATA PRESENTION AND DISCUSSION FINDING
The occurrences of building collapse across the building categories in Nigeria from 1980 to the present date was
investigated and the findings are presented in Table 3, which revealed that not less than 60 cases of building
collapse occurred during this period. 42 (70.0%) of these cases occurred in private buildings, 14 cases (23.3%)
occurred in the public setting while only 4 cases (6.7%) were associated with the corporate organizations. The
high figure recorded under private building might not be unconnected with the hasty and carefree manners in
which most private clients handle their building projects. This lends credence to Folagbade (2001)’s works that
private sector accounted for the bulk (76%) of reported cases of building collapse between 1980 and 1991 in
Lagos state and that hasty construction accounted for some of the major causes of building collapse in Nigeria.
Based on these findings, the questionnaire sought to examine the level of compliance with the building plan
approval before the commencement of their construction. The result presented in Table 4 indicated that 29
respondent contractors (representing 32.2%) managed to secure building plan approval before the construction
commencement while a vast number of them (61 people, representing 67.8%) evaded the approval before
starting the construction works for their clients. 

Similar trends were also observed in the case of the clients,
where 75% of them failed to secure building approval before the commencement of their construction works.
The evasion of necessary building plan by these two categories of respondents justified the need to investigate
the registration categories of these contractors with the Federal Registration Board of Nigeria and the number of
permanent employees in their payroll. This is with a view to understand their levels of formality and firms’
classifications (e.g. large sized firms, medium-size firms and small-sized firms). Currently, the Federal
Registration Board of Nigeria has four categories of registration which are based on their contract values. They
are Category A (Contract sum up to N2 Million); Category B (N2 Million – N25 Million); Category C (N25
Million – N100 Million) and Category D (Above N100 Million). [N150=$1]. The results in Table 5 revealed that
72 of the respondents (80.0%) are registered under category A of the Federal Registration Board of Nigeria, 12
of them (13.3%) have category B registration, four (4.5%) registered under category C while two of the
respondents (2%) have category D registration. Also, 81 of the contractors (90.0%) keep up to 10 permanent
employees in their pay roll, of which only 6 of them (6.7%) was able to keep up to 50 permanent employees in
their pay roll, while 2 firms (2.2%) and 1 firm (1.1%) have permanent employees of up to 80 and above one 100
permanent employees respectively. According to the construction firm’s classification by Ward (1979), the bulk
of the surveyed contractors fall within the small sized category in terms of the revealed parameters in the
findings, hence, the influence by domineering role of the informal sector is observed in construction activities in
the rural areas and the outskirts of the urban centres of the country. This supports the view of Uwakweh (2000)
that informal settings are more pronounced in the rural areas than the urban centre and that they fall within the
small sized category with little or no level of formalities.
As a consequence of these findings, the questionnaires sought to understand the level of effectiveness of
monitoring of building construction activities by the appropriate government agencies across the six geo-political
regions of the country. The results in Table 6 showed that 72 (80.0%) of the contractors attested to the
ineffectiveness of the monitoring activities of construction works by the relevant government agencies while
18 of them (20.0%) affirmed that the monitoring activities of construction works are very effective. Similar
sentiments were also shared by the clients as 87 of the respondents (91.6%) attested to the ineffectiveness of the
monitoring of construction activities by the relevant government agencies while 8 (8.4%) of them affirmed that
the monitoring activities are effective. The ineffectiveness of the relevant government agencies in this
perspective might be responsible for the high number of reported cases of building collapse in the private sector
which are dominated by the informal setting.
Moreover, in Table 6, the questionnaire further to understand the awareness among contractors and the clients
about the existing Building/Planning Regulations in their different states/regions (Table 7). The result
surprisingly revealed that a vast number of these respondents were quite aware of the existence of the
Building/Planning Regulations in the country. For example, 81 (90.0%) of the respondent contractors attested to
the awareness of these regulations in their various domains while a few of them (9 or 10.0%) claimed ignorance
of the existence of these regulations. For the clients, 78 (82.1%) claimed that they were aware of the existence of
the Building/Planning Regulations in their domains while 17 (17.9%) of them claimed ignorance of these
regulations.
As shown in Tables 6 and 7, a vast number of these stakeholders are quite aware of the existing
building/planning regulations in their various states/regions but just capitalized on the ineffective nature of the
monitoring agencies across the country by doing things in the wrong way. This confirms the observation by
Uwakweh (2000) that the informal sectors evade the formal process of obtaining permits and approvals for their
construction programs and activities.
In addition to these findings, the questionnaire sought to investigate the perceived causes of building collapse in
Nigeria in relation to the existing Building Regulations. Table 8 shows that 36.0% of the causes were as a result
of non-possession of approved drawing.

 Only 19.0% was as a result of possession of approved drawing, 17.0% occurred as a result of approved drawings but non-compliance and/or use of poor quality materials. 15.0%
possessed approved drawings but the construction works were performed by unqualified people while 13.0% of
them possessed the necessary building drawings and complied with the approved drawings but used poor quality
building materials for their construction works. This result further attested to the weakness of the relevant
government agencies in ensuring standard in the construction industry in Nigeria. The incessant cases of building
collapse in the country might also be attributed to this neglect.