Project Abstract

Abstract
Thomas Hobbes, in his seminal work "Leviathan," presents a comprehensive political theory that revolves around the concept of the Leviathan. This paper provides a critical analysis of Hobbes' concept of the Leviathan, focusing on its significance in understanding his political philosophy. The Leviathan, according to Hobbes, is a metaphorical representation of the sovereign state, a powerful entity created by individuals through a social contract to maintain peace and order in society. This concept is essential for comprehending Hobbes' justification for absolute sovereignty and the need for a strong central authority to prevent the natural state of war and chaos. The analysis delves into the historical context of the Leviathan, examining how it emerges as a response to the turbulent political landscape of the English Civil War. Hobbes' Leviathan is a product of his pessimistic view of human nature, where individuals are driven by self-interest and a perpetual state of conflict. By establishing the Leviathan as an all-powerful entity with the authority to enforce laws and maintain social order, Hobbes aims to mitigate the inherent state of war that characterizes human interactions in the absence of a sovereign power. Furthermore, the paper explores the implications of the Leviathan in terms of individual rights and liberties. While Hobbes argues for the surrender of certain freedoms to the Leviathan in exchange for security and protection, critics have raised concerns about the potential for tyranny and the infringement of natural rights under absolute sovereignty. This tension between the necessity of a strong central authority and the preservation of individual liberties remains a central point of contention in Hobbesian political theory. Moreover, the analysis examines the role of the Leviathan in shaping modern political thought and its influence on subsequent philosophers. Hobbes' concept of the Leviathan has sparked debates on the nature of political authority, the limits of government power, and the balance between order and liberty in society. By critically evaluating the implications of the Leviathan in Hobbes' political philosophy, this paper sheds light on the enduring relevance of his ideas in contemporary discussions on governance, sovereignty, and the social contract. In conclusion, the concept of the Leviathan is a crucial element in understanding Thomas Hobbes' political theory and his vision of a stable and orderly society. Through a critical analysis of the Leviathan, this paper illuminates the complexities of Hobbes' philosophy and its broader implications for political theory and practice.

Project Overview

INTRODUCTION

1.1THE BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

This study is an attempt to examine the idea of the Leviathan in Thomas Hobbes political philosophy. Before we discuss his philosophy of society we need to know what was happening before he came.

There Was the problem of the excessive use of power in the society.One could rule in as much as he commanded obedience from others by the use of brute power and force. This led to conflict and self-centeredness among humans.

An attempt to escape from the above crisis led Hobbes to postulate a common wealth or the state as a platform for organizing human beings or what he called the Leviathan. The idea of the Leviathan aimed at providing a means by which men can overcome the disorder in the natural state.The people needed the state of nature, to fashion a contract, giving all their power to one man who becomes the sovereign.

From the above, the research question is this; Is the Leviathan construed either as a ruler or a State able to solve the problem of insecurity, self-centeredness and the egoism in the nature of man? Will the absolute power embedded in a Leviathan not lead to tyranny and abuses? These are some of the issues that this study intends to look into critically.

1.2STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The problem of this study can be put in question form:

Is the Leviathan immune to the egoistic nature of man which he has been chosen to guard against? Can the chaos and conflict which exists on the state of nature be eliminated with the institution of the common wealth? How does the Leviathan intend to tackle the problem of behaviorism and human nature which is egoistic and self-centered in order to ensure a peaceful human society wherein people will be law abiding? Will the absolute power embedded in the sovereign not lead to tyranny, totalitarianism and abuse? This project work tries to tackle some of these questions.

1.3THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This work aims at critically analyzing the concept of the Leviathan. It also attempt to proffer solutions to the problems identified in Hobbes theory.This work studies Hobbes notion of the society and how human beings can live together peacefully in a society. We may ask; how can humans evolve a peaceful system where law and order are properly defined?

1.4THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This study is significant in the sense that it emphasizes the wider breath of Hobbes conception of the leviathan. His intention is to capture all areas of life with an attempt of reconstructing the society into a better one by proffering the Leviathan. Effort will be made to review and apply his concept of the Leviathan in examining the view of human nature as egoistic and individualistic and how we can evolve a stable and viable society from such a human nature.

1.5THE SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This project work examines critically the concept of the Leviathan in Hobbes social and political philosophy. It looks into other concepts like the state of nature which led to the postulation of Leviathan. It advances theory and knowledge by expanding the view of other social contractarians in order to give a balanced view of our topic of study.

1.6METHODOLOGY

This research work uses the method of critical analysis to examine the idea of the Leviathan in Hobbes. The research tools to be used are archival materials such as textbooks, encyclopedia and internet sources. By using the critical method this study seeks to provide a systematic and comprehensive understanding of the idea of the Leviathan and the extent to which it can be a viable option for bringing about order, peace and cooperation in the society.

1.7LITERATURE REVIEW

The first book to be reviewed, is Thomas Hobbes Leviathan; by John plamenatz. He argued that The Leviathan was “chosen or instituted when men do agree and covenant every one that to whatsoever man or assembly of men shall be given by the major part the right to present the person of them all, that is to say to be their representative”.2 The Leviathan ensures them living in peace amongst themselves and be protected against other men.

The second book to be reviewed, is Elements of Philosophy by Samuel Enoch Stumpf and Donald C. Abel. Here,the argument is that the civil society created by the social contract must have power to punish those who transgress the agreement. Convinced that fear is the greatest motivator, the state must have sufficient positive power to terrify its citizens into obedience3

The third book to be reviewed is History of Political Thought by Anthony O. Okoh. Here there is an argument for the provision of an absolute ruler The Leviathan.He believed that it was only an absolute ruler that could tame the wicked tendencies which exhibited in the state of nature4.

The fourth book to be reviewed, is Philosophy Made Simple by Richard H.P.Here it was understood that since sovereignty is created by a covenant or contract, the subject retains all those natural rights that cannot be transferred by covenant5 To put it differently, since the subject has entered into the contract to preserve and protect his life, the subject cannot refuse to obey the sovereign.

The fifth book to be reviewed ,is Ethics: A Systematic and Historical Study by Joseph Omoregbe. Here Hobbes argues that men decided to come together and form an organized society since life was so in secured in the state of nature. They came together, made a social contract, empowered the sovereign to decide what should be done and what should not be done in the society.